Grendeldef
Trancerelic & coffeeholic
I am puzzled why some people prefer camel archers over keshiks due to slightly higher strength. Camel archers CAN be fought in rough terrain & you may be able to catch them using clever tactics.
Surely percentages are open to interpretations but I'd describe ~30% (16->21) increase in RCS from Keshik to CA something else than 'slight'. It makes a difference against units but especially against cities. Increase in pure CS of 12% is more suitable to this 'slight' category but even it seems to make a difference - partly because there's a difference and partly based on how keen AI is to attack units with higher CS.
Might be, as I said earlier, a playstyle issue but while 1 extra mp is nice it's rarely useful and even more rarely actually needed. Doesn't make much of a difference whether I'm hiding in an untargettable tile or untargettable +1 tile away. What I do care, though, is what happens when I get caught and the CA's survivability is better. In practice both are pretty much immortal against AI until GWBs but CAs can to a degree survive with those as well which makes a life span of CA a bit longer.
In case Keshiks/CAs are hitting something they can both be caught and if not they aren't getting much xp either. The extra xp for Keshik is nice and useful while CAs can compensate that a bit by being able to take an extra hit of two.
I'm willing to admit that comparison between two roughly equal units is tricky at best but statements like
don't feel justified.In hands of a seasoned civ player I think keshik wins by a long margin