C2C - UEM - Ultimate-Earth-Map 100% MOD and SVN update compatible by Pit2015

[Pit2015]

He is free to game casual or mainstream easy games, but should not complain about an easy AI then. Gatekeeping is funny, so all harder difficulty settings have to removed from games.
Or be a consumer and buy more new casual games after they get to boring in 2 weeks. No one forcing him to game challenging games.

If he wants to game stardew valley he is allowed to do it. But next day he can try a real challenge. He said he always wins the scenario and the AI sucks, yeah as he is making it so easy that every children can win it.

Hes talking about lies but dont read that this mentioned game was on a more easy setting. Hes complaining day by day instead of trying to get better. I never said i will win the scenario, but i will try soon. My gameplay is not about wining by destroying all other civs, its about surviving and keep planet earth peaceful and going as long as possible and try to get to the first place.

UEM still a hard scenario and is recommended to game on eternity+nightmare to make it a deep and hard experience, if you cant handle it and if you want game on a difficulty lvl you always can win do it.

Otherwise take a real challenge, learn and get more experienced and try to survive, or to win on a real hard challenge. If you lose you cry around like a children, yeah you better give up.

Thats why ppl do sports and try to expand there own limits, thats why ppl learn and try to get better.

So give up or take the challenge and get better.

Gatekeeping is a search by some guys for answers after they gave up. On the other side gatekeeping is correct to call him self elite by owning 2500 games and items for 500$ is no elite, its a consuming lamer.
2500 easy casual games. 2490 games, in game time 1 hour. 1 challenging game, in game time 2333 hours.

So ring the bell @Somebody613 but dont cry around here about the scenario is to easy or to hard for you, go game more easy stuff. Or go now and try to survive on a real challenge.
If you fail try again or feel free to go and game more easy stuff, just ring the bell to give up.

 

[Somebody613]

@Pit2015
Funny.
So *you* actually DON'T have what to brag about for *your* gaming on *your* scenario, yet you dare mocking others who outright tell you that your game rules are stupid.
How about *you* show us how *you* win on *your* scenario WITHOUT using easier rules, eh?
With SCREENS and SAVES, because I don't even TRUST you now, lol.
Let's see, CLUCKER MC'AIRPUFF.

 

[Pit2015]

We will see, if i fail i try again. As said i will report here on my next long game. No way to cheat for me, only lamers cheat. Scenario is set, that are the current rules.

 

[Somebody613]

We will see, if i fail i try again. As said i will report here on my next long game. No way to cheat for me, only lamers cheat. Scenario is set, that are the current rules.

And I repeat:
SCREENS and SAVES every 100 turns (and/or major events) - or it didn't happen, lol.
If anything, it's gonna be interesting to watch the progress unveiling.

Also, do you maybe have a save that goes with the screenshot you showed me?
Not that precise year, but at least the same game.

https://forums.civfanatics.com/attachments/civ4screenshot0385-jpg.513328/

 

[Pit2015]

You can find some of the old saves on the pages here around that screenshot (Page 75 +-10 pages), but it will not load as there are to many mod changes now, old game with more easy options.
Was on eternity+deity, now the scenario is made even harder.

No need to prove anything to you, i always report my long games here. No one cares if you trust or not. So you will see what and how often i report here.

Try by yourself and report here as much as you want, game on the scenario rules if you want to report or ring the bell. Dont cry around if you fail, learn an try again.

And dont cheat by deleting the tribal guardian, build up a good army and use your brain to choose the right time to attack.

 

[Somebody613]

Yeah, but everyone cares about YOUR opinion, LAMER. /s
Like I said, the fact you can't even fathom how I *didn't* cheat to kill that Tribal Guardian (but did get lucky a few times), shows EXACTLY how "well" YOU can play.
Stop puffing yourself up with empty air, lest you EXPLODE, dude.

 

[Somebody613]

I don't have time now to try AGAIN, and I killed the Egyptian one too long ago to retrace the save.
But here's ALMOST the proof of concept.
All I needed was 1 more basic [N.S.C.] coming with me to get rid of the defending [S.C.] that suicide-blocked [The Dude]'s attack on [T.G.].
And note how this [T.G.] has some building-provided defense (13%), whereas the Egyptian one probably didn't have it yet, because I only used 3 [N.S.C.]s to kill it quite easily.
Also, I first tried to kill the Babylonian [T.G.], but it has 18% city-defense, and even with a 70% success [The Dude] somehow lost THREE times in a row (reloads).
In any case, check Screens 14 and 15, you'll see that [T.G.] was half-dead already BEFORE [The Dude, +75% STR, 4 base STR] even made a move.
So, if not for the meat-shield, it'd be DEAD.
I might do a rerun tomorrow (too busy now), but I already showed you that I could wipe the stupid [T.G.] even with un-promoted [N.S.C.]s, though would need maybe 6 or 8 to do so.
Probably 6, because the [T.G.] was half-dead already after just 4 base [N.S.C.] attacks.
Actually, just 3, because you can see from Screen 10 that the first attack was in vain.
So, yeah, 6 or maybe 7 base [N.S.C.]s would do the job more than likely.
But, let me guess, you will continue insulting me for "deleting the [T.G.]", right?

 

[Pit2015]

Yeah, with 6 units you may get lucky on a easy city early enough. But it still risky and may fail. Good job so far. But you still on place 5, and not all civs visible now. And the city will be destroyed, you cant conquer a pop 1 cities as you learned now, so no good win so far. You lost as many forces as you destroyed? Gives the other AI civs more time and you have to rebuild now. But you learned a good new strategy if you want to clear some territory near you early, well if it dont fails.

Be honest to yourself and dont reload if a battle fails and dont cheat. Take the consequences and keep trying to survive, also if a outcome is not as you wish.

Btw how old are you? @Somebody613

 

[Thunderbrd]

I'm still trying to wrap my head around 'Arsehowl' (Is this another word for 'wolf fart'?) and 'CLUCKER MC'AIRPUFF'.

 

[Pit2015]

I'm still trying to wrap my head around 'Arsehowl' (Is this another word for 'wolf fart'?) and 'CLUCKER MC'AIRPUFF'.

https://raft.fandom.com/wiki/Clucker

 

[Toffer90]

Yeah, but everyone cares about YOUR opinion, LAMER. /s

You overestimate Pit's influence, he's no guru on C2C (no offense pit, I appreciate your fandom to what I too is a fan of; C2C.).

You should stop pestering Pit, it was cute to begin with, but it's getting old.
Take it as friendly advice from a relatively impartial third party who doesn't really care about what you two have been bickering about.

I also appreciate your enthusiasm Somebody, but as Pit eluded to with this question:

Btw how old are you? @Somebody613

The way you stubbornly keep challenging Pit over trivialities does appear quite childish.
I do see your side of things too, Pit is quite cheeky in his assertions, but you just have to accept him as he is.

 

[tmv]

I'm still trying to wrap my head around 'Arsehowl' (Is this another word for 'wolf fart'?) and 'CLUCKER MC'AIRPUFF'.

Not to mention "game" as a verb.

 

[Pit2015]

He is just a bit upset as he becomes his first taste of a real challenge and failing, i am a Clucker and some harder stuff if he fails to take a city by fatally failing to conquer it and he gets a bit angry.

I dont need to respond to him, so no big deal. Yeah he is nerving sometimes a bit by stubbornly keep challenging over trivialities, not only here i know. But he will grow up more as he is beginning to take a real challenge.

Childrens "play", gamers game. So real gamers never use the word play or playing. Only "Childrens" and casual "Players" do, or upset "Players" will do:

So never ever use the word "play" anymore if you want to be a real gamer. - Gamers game! Childrens play.

 

[tmv]

So never ever use the word "play" anymore if you want to be a real gamer. - Gamers game! Childrens play.

Did you even watch that video yourself? It doesn't exactly support what you are saying.

And you are a clucker? Which one: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=clucker ?

 

[Pit2015]

Did you even watch that video yourself? It doesn't exactly support what you are saying.

And you are a clucker? Which one: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=clucker ?

Somebody613 said i am a Clucker. Read the previous postings. But we thought hes meaning: https://raft.fandom.com/wiki/Clucker .

Crackhead! Damn, he was really angry then... Must be the new gamer slang. No... no time travelers dont use crack.

Yep, what i said is not told in the video, its only a example for gamer slang, and to show how some gamers may react if they are a bit angry.
Also to show some examples about gamer slang as you dont know my old gamer slang: "game" "Gamers game! Childrens play."

Here is the prove, you can watch me in my movie, no... no time travelers dont use crack. (H.G Wells The Time Machine - 1960 / Die Zeitmaschine 1960) Nice sunday movie btw.

 

[FireBlaze]

I feel like im having a stroke whenever I try and parse this thread. To me, that is gaming

 

[Somebody613]

Okay, I'll calm down. Maybe. I'll try. Maybe. Lol. Not maybe.

Cluck-er, from chick-en. Not my fault there's a dumb slang for EVERY word out there.

How's "game as a verb" a problem? I was sure it's normative English, lol.
https://wordtype.org/of/game (2)

Yeah, "arse that howls", but also a version of "butt entrance" that wouldn't get auto-corrected.
And "cluck-er (aka chick-en) who is puffed with air (of arrogant hypocrisy)".
I love my neo-jumble-isms, lol.

And one last time to explain my emotions: I don't accept being "gatekept" by someone who clearly insults me for something they themselves also fail at.
That's hypocrisy, and I do not support hypocrites, period.
Now, the end - for that point.

 

[Somebody613]

MWAHAHAHA!!!
I won't even comment.
YOU check the screens and YOU tell me what exactly I did here.
LOOOL!!!

 

[Somebody613]

And MWAHAHAHA!!! x2:
YOU WERE SAYING???

 

[Pit2015]

Yeah, that looks a bit better now. Good job, now you got a good chance to survive a bit.

Now go into WB and place a special agent of your own into every civs capital city you dont have a contact with as test (You are allowed to reload the last savegame without the special agents when you continue your game), then exit WB again to see on which place you are really currently with all civs, lets see how far you can hold your place.

But is the same old game, so you reloaded after failing. (Same scouting/recon on map) If you loss you should restart not reload a save until you get lucky.
Only lamers reload. (Cheating and to easy) The price for failing is to restart or continue with your failed stuff.

But lets see how long you can keep up on the top places.

In 31 turns it will become hard for you as you have to pay the second city maintenance, so beware not to conquer to much low pop cities to early. Persia may become your regional competitor.