Mounties w/o rax means war defnately. But settler means no war, right

. I bet TNT didn't build a granary, just build a couple settlers inbetween immortals. Or maybe they forgot to turn down science and running negative gpt lost them their granary

.
I think Dnuts won't be powerful enough to be a threat even with GL, and pyramids or military are much better. At this point, MIA is our biggest threat.
These also prove the "mirror" theory. Greece hasn't hooked up a second lux, definately due to their overimproving settler factory tiles. Also poorly running it, more food means bigger size next settler so they actually will get it in 4 turns.
Since MIA is still pumping setters, then they're not a threat to us, at least for a while.
Back to the Dynamites, the iron in the strategic resource box and rax in capital mean they were pumping immortals. Perhaps they now think they have enough to take on the Dnuts and have started making more settlers? If that's so, they're stooppid, Nuts have mounties, and IMO have the edge over the immortals. With only a couple cities due to early mil buildup versus Dnuts farmers gambit (as it appears with the granary) I bet Dnut has more cities, therefore more productivity and a higher shield start. The Nuts could eat the TNT's alive. If we propose the city gifting offer they might be insulted

.
Ok, maybe I'm overthinking this.
Edit: After viewing more data posted in other threads, I think I may be wrong about the TNT's city numbers, considering they're second in score, and not agricultural, and didn't build a granary either. They must have captured nuts cities, which were already high populated cause of agricultural, which would explain the Dnuts low score. Dnuts are definately losing as this is proof, anyway to help them?