AlpsStranger
Jump jump on the tiger!
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
- Messages
- 5,820
You need to step back, take a deep breath, and reanalyze the situation Alps.
...Actually, upon a moment's reflection, this is a statement more of stupidity than credible malice.
You mean, your own statements? You do seem to have gone off the deep end here. The struggle between free speech and censorship continues, and (IMO) the long term trend seems to be towards freedom. We should respect the Congressman's freedom to express his concerns as much as we do yours.
I'm curious. Why exactly?I'm in favor of not allowing games like GTA to be played by children.
I'm curious. Why exactly?
And at what stage does adult consciousness become immune to the effects (whatever they are) likely to be visited on children?
I'm in favor of not allowing games like GTA to be played by children.
Scapegoating: dogding the core of the issues and not attempting to challange the situration. Banning GTA 5 would not only go against the First Amendent but also will have no impact on criminal violence records.
The living fossils who run the country are making the mistake of assuming they are simply taking a few toys from powerless 15 year-old kids. They're actually dealing with a potentially organizable voting block. People base their political identity on their gun collections or their appetite for weed, so why is this any worse?
I plan to vote straight libertarian in protest if the Democrats back this. I'm willing to let a few overwrought comments by cornered pro-NRA Democrats slide, but if they start pursuing this in earnest they've lost me for good. They clearly don't envision the kind of freedom I thought they did if they are so petty as to snatch my game software from me.
Because the first amendment says something about not making fun of people for their opinions? I'm not a government telling him he can't speak or I'll punish him. He's the one advocating censorship and I'm calling him stupid. Free speech is being used to belittle someone else's free speech. No inconsistency.
I'm not telling him not to say "GTA should be banned." I'm saying "GTA should not be banned, and you're silly for wanting it."
EDIT: I'm defining banned as "Not legal for sale or use by adults." I actually think the supreme court overreached by saying they couldn't ban selling them directly to kids. I'm in favor of not allowing games like GTA to be played by children.
I now hope they try and fail.
Join us Alps!
You want a law saying children can't play them, or a law saying children can't buy them? The latter would be far, far less serious than the former.
*Sorry, I mean "without parental permission." Ideally I should be allowed to decide my 12 year old is mature enough for Counterstrike. But, if the political reality is that or a ban for adults I'll take what I can get.
South Park said:Should we blame the matches?
Should we blame the fire?
Or the doctors who allowed him to expire?
Heck no!
Blame Canada! Blame Canada!
If it's illegal in the States I don't think they'll bother to release it.
True, it just sickens me that other people want to control what I play. How petty can you get? The fact that it was even said out loud by a senator is bad enough to make me furious.
I'm not for gun control ( at least not as a hyperventilating response to Sandy Hook ) but at least guns are actually used in shootings. These rat ******** are actually saying they want to culturally engineer me by controlling what I can see. That's dehumanizing on a very, very deep level.
Now, personally my first game was GTA 2 at the age of 5.
how does a five year old even get a play station????