SlowThinker
Prince
Fundamentalism (tech)
Fanatics add: (with Fund. govt)
Fundamentalism (govt)
Can build Fanatics add: (with Fund. tech)
Explanation: Fanatics can be built only if you have both the Fundy tech and the Fundy government (for example Fundy govt from the SOL is not sufficient).
tithes=number of citizen that would be converted.
(Did I understand the MC +2, +3, +4 well?)
In other words, Mike is not fully equal to Cathedrals in each city.
Suppose you have a cathedral AND Mike. Will both produce tithes under Fundy? (I guess yes...)
Where did you get the 13? In my opinion cities with distance higher than 11 have the dist. shortened to 10; cities with dist. lower than 11 are unaffected by communism.
, the same strange "13"
e.g. revolt costs 50% more for a city 6 sqs from capital.
I think it is correct (for a city of distance 6). But I consider the whole sentence as superfluous.
Nethog, IMHO your reference pack should notify about the individual features, not elucidate them completely. The reader will always have to go to Info: dip/spy if he will want to know details.
Fanatics add: (with Fund. govt)
Fundamentalism (govt)
Can build Fanatics add: (with Fund. tech)
Explanation: Fanatics can be built only if you have both the Fundy tech and the Fundy government (for example Fundy govt from the SOL is not sufficient).
So it looks that the logic is thatOriginally posted by starlifter
Only 2 wonders affect tithe: Michelangelos Chapel, and JSB. I expounded on that in my reply to Nethog.
JSB = +2 tithe, MC = +2 +3 or +4.
tithes=number of citizen that would be converted.
(Did I understand the MC +2, +3, +4 well?)
In other words, Mike is not fully equal to Cathedrals in each city.
Suppose you have a cathedral AND Mike. Will both produce tithes under Fundy? (I guess yes...)
I agree. I think the chart should be an overview first rather than a complete info. An overview should be as brief as possible so that it is synoptical.Originally posted by starlifter
This is why I don't like quantifications iin a summary sheet.... the wording is long and awkward to get correct, and the foumulas and explanations are not any easier or more concise.
Originally posted by starlifter
If a communist city (without a courthouse) is 13 or more squares from its capital, the the price of revolting/subverting that city is the same; costs closer to the capital are unaffected."

I was wrong. Cities under 16 are affected too, of course.Originally posted by SlowThinker
This is not correct.
Price of enemy bribing some of your cities is increased. (The max. distance is lower, and so there is no effect for cities that are close to the capital and very far from the capital. Only cities with the distance from 11 to 16 are affected).
Originally posted by starlifter
"Courthouses increase the cost of revolting/subverting any non-Democratic city without a palace. Exception: Communism costs never exceed that of a city 13 tiles from the capital."

I suppose you meanOriginally posted by starlifter
I just noticed.... your Courthouse Improvent comment is wrong!
e.g. revolt costs 50% more for a city 6 sqs from capital.
I think it is correct (for a city of distance 6). But I consider the whole sentence as superfluous.
Nethog, IMHO your reference pack should notify about the individual features, not elucidate them completely. The reader will always have to go to Info: dip/spy if he will want to know details.