I don't know how I can take you as an adult when you lack basic capitalization, grammar, and punctuation in your posts. Your arguments are pretty bad too, it mades the double-whammy.
Civ IV graphics look like they're made for five year olds. If you want proof, look at one leaderhead. Look at the moving resources. Seriously, moving resources? I don't need to be eye-entertained every 2 seconds to enjoy the game. Another step by Firaxis to dumb down Civ to the lowest possible level.
False. Civ IV graphics look terrible and not constructed well. They're made to look cool to a younger generation. Civ III's are better for an epic game, which Civ is. Civ IV's look good for a smaller game, but Civ is not designed to be a small game.
A problem.
Easily modded in.
I don't see how this is a problem. Does pollution not exist in real life?
Easily modded in.
The religion concept, while a good idea is not well implemented. All the religions are the same, and they all have the same effects. They're a good concept but not well implemented. I don't have much experience with the corporations, so I can't comment on them.
Good, great people is a broken concept that gives an unfair advantage to a human player vs. the AI.
Same resources. There's actually more in Civ III.
False. Units in Civ III are more balanced.
That, I must admit, is a bad thing. Easily implemented with modding though.
I wouldn't say that. Civ IV's is so bad that they had to bring back Civ III music.
True. That's one thing.
Don't kid yourself.
I'd rather have no wonder movies than that half-ass job from Firaxis with the Civ IV wonder movies. Have you ever seen anything so bland?
Pretty realistic. How many times do you see a squadron of cannon beating a squadron of tanks?
Why would you want to do that?
You would live in a cave in 4000 BC.
Volcanoes.
It makes more sense than "Strength." Some unit types are better at offense than defense, like Tanks. Strength makes no sense at all.
Promotions only make sense with a Strength combat system, which Civ III doesn't have, nullifying this point.
I'll agree with you there, but Civ IV's is pretty dumb too.
Yes, you still are childish. Your reasons are very bad, and you refuse to refute posters, but rather go on a untangible ramble about Civ III or Civ IV. Your grammar, punctuation, and spelling leaves much to be desired. I will give you that you sometimes post arguments and something resembling proof, but I rarely see it.
Moderator Action: No need to attack grammar & spelling
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889