Civ 5 Design Challenge II - Mechanics

[Uighur_Caesar]

I've changed my old Tanzimat Era Ottomans to fit this mechanic:

Tanzimat Era Ottoman Empire

Leader: Mahmud II

UA: Tanzimat: Upgrading military units gives Science relative to their XP. Adopting Social Policies gives all land units XP and temporarily allows them to upgrade for free.

UU: Mansure Army: Replaces the Rifleman (Line Infantry with EE mod). The Mansure Army is stronger and gains more XP when fighting other Gun units. Level 5 or higher Mansure Armies reduce Social Policy cost by 1% (max 15%).

UB: Imaret: Much cheaper than the Hospital and unlocked at Theology. +3 Food instead of +5, and +2 Happiness. Whenever a citizen is born, 25% of excess Food is converted to Culture.

 

[Sgtwolf00]

I've changed my old Tanzimat Era Ottomans to fit this mechanic:

I was considering doing a Tanzimat era Ottomans. But the tulips looked more appealing, and easier to construct.

 

[GPuzzle]

After so many errors, I'm back on schedule!

So who takes this one?

TinyLittleBirdy's Klingon Empire?

senshidenshi's San Theodoros?

GPuzzle's Holy Roman Empire?

Sgtwolf00's Ottomans?

Howard Tafty's Republic of China?

Scapegrace's Society of Jesus?

Urdnot_Scott's Margraviate of Brandenburg?

Hoop Thrower's Valencia?

Natan35's Israel?

Uighur_Caesar's Ottoman Empire?

You have until 23/10/15 to vote!

 

[senshidenshi]

(Uh, the name of the Civ is San Theodoros, and Alcazar is the leader.)

I vote for Urdnot_Scott's Margraviate of Brandenburg.

 

[GPuzzle]

you saw nothing

 

[Natan35]

I don't see the question mark?
Also, it's a really though one. I vote for Scott.

 

[senshidenshi]

I don't see the question mark?

That's intentional, see?

So who takes this one?

senshidenshi's San Theodoros

 

[Scapegrace]

Much as I hate to jump on a bandwagon, I'm voting for Urdnot_Scott's Margraviate of Brandenburg too. =]

 

[SULOMON]

I vote for Hoop Thrower's Valencia.

 

[Hoop Thrower]

I vote for Uighur_Caesar's Ottoman Empire

 

[Tarmont]

Brandenburg! Brandenburg! Brandenburg!

 

[Howard Tafty]

dem Brandenberg

 

[Natan35]

We need technical victory rules...

I'm so facist

 

[Urdnot_Scott]

We need technical victory rules...

I'm so facist

What's wrong with the way it works now?

Also I vote for GPuzzle

EDIT: Just realised that GPuzzle runs this challenge if I can't vote for him I vote for Uighur Caesar

 

[Uighur_Caesar]

What do you mean technical victory?

Also, I vote for Hoop.

 

[GPuzzle]

Scott, I put myself there because I wanted to be voted on, seriously. It's not like I can't be voted on.

As for me, I'm going with Hoop Thrower's design.

 

[Sgtwolf00]

So many choices. But I'm going to help for my Ottoman brothers and vote for Uighur_Caeser!

 

[Hoop Thrower]

To be honest I'm still having a hard time figuring out how Urdnot_Scott's design fits the challenge.

 

[GPuzzle]

Fair point, he seems to have gone around using the mechanic in two separate areas - the relation Social Policy-Experience in the UB, and the Military Bonus upon Social Policies!

It does not fit the challenge's conditions!

It's a very nice design, but sorry, Urdnot_Scott, you're disqualified!

 

[Urdnot_Scott]

The Kantone, unlike the Barracks it replaces, yields an additional 5 experience for trained units for every finished policy tree.

Here ya go.

EDIT: Wait what? It feels very cheeky to be told I'm disqualified after the design phase has closed, anybody could have pointed that out during the design phase. Pointing it out after the event, and funnily while I'm winning (strange coincidence right?) is incredibly rude and unprofessional if you ask me.