JFD
Kathigitarkh
That's why the latter option would be more appropriate - but to be honest, if this civ is supposed to be a pirate-y one, then the Lantaka is definitely ironic.
I'm sorry, what? Malacca and Malaysia are two completely different civs, lumping them together would be like lumping Arabia and Persia together. I think you're better off going one way or the other, not trying to put both together. If you're going to have the civ represent the Malacca Sultanate, call it as such, otherwise call it Malaysia and forget about Malacca altogether.
Might have something to do with him, y'know, not being a pirate. Cap'n Para, for all that I call him that, had people to do his piracy for him, specifically the Orang Laut; tribes native to the Straits of Malacca that became fanatically loyal to the Sultanate of Malacca and were effectively made into a nation of privateers, plundering foreign trade routes (particularly Majapahit, with whom the good Cap'n had quite a staggering amount of beef) while protecting Malacca's trade fleets and those of their allies. It was this setup that allowed Malacca to flourish, and it bought them a lot of Chinese support; Parameswara gave gifts to the Chinese that awed even the Celestial Emperor (a Ming of some stripe or another, if memory serves) and afforded them the protection of the massive Chinese military structure. Yeah, Majapahit was less of a problem after all that.
Hope that explained some things! =]
Isn't it just as right as Gajah Mada being the leader of Indonesia? So, according to Firaxis standards, Parameswara would work
Isn't it just as right as Gajah Mada being the leader of Indonesia? So, according to Firaxis standards, Parameswara would work Good to see another HQ Asian civ coming
We'll cross that bridge when we come to it, I'm more concerned about getting a solid civ design out that people want to consume. Does anyone want to rip the idea to shreds or at least discuss the mechanics?
Also we need new City-States - I'm thinking Lichtenstein and Luxembourg.
Remove 2 Asian city states and replace them with minor European cities? In a game already hounded by some aspects of the community for a eurocentric bias, I'd say thats a bad idea, especially with Vaduz, which hasn't accomplished anything.Also we need new City-States - I'm thinking Lichtenstein and Luxembourg.
Remove 2 Asian city states and replace them with minor European cities? In a game already hounded by some aspects of the community for a eurocentric bias, I'd say thats a bad idea, especially with Vaduz, which hasn't accomplished anything.
I'd say Riyadh and Nassau.
Just add five more montevideos and we are done.
Criticises choices based upon ethnic incongruity
Proceeds to suggest two city-states which are ethnically incongruous
Also, Vaduz already taken by Belgium.
Ahah, I wasn't criticising them for being non-Asian, just for being European and minor in a game already accused of being tilted towards Europe. If we'd want to replace 2 Asian CS's with Asian cities, which is fair enough, I'd go with Lahore and Phnom Penh.
Yeah, I know - I just found the tone of my reply more amusing than to accept your point
But yeah - city-states should ideally be replaced with similar city-states, because it's currently not possible/not known how to change the City-State music; which means the Asian styled music that plays will be there no matter the replacement.
Oh, weird, I didn't realise that, I'd definitely go with Phnom Penh and Lahore in that case. (unless the music set doesn't fit India, I cant remember how many music sets there are, but I can't imagine there's a separate one for east Asia vs south Asia, given the art styles are the same.)