it is awesome. It is the only civ game i have played but it is awesome. Very addicting. It is exactly the same as the others. The only difference is graphics and online is a tad different
I am talking about multiplayer. just like in the title of this thread. you do make it sound good though. im still worried about not being able to move stacks. is there a turn timer?
No need to be rude, dude. Anyway, the pluses of the multiplayer game are a better challenge. The problem is I have only had success getting a multiplayer game going with 2 players. I haven't had any luck connecting with 4 players.
sorry about the multiplayer thing. any way, the multiplayer is awesome to. people tend to quit and it is sometimes hard to find a game. i find them best during evening. 4 player and 2 are the best. the longer the game is out, the more people will play mp. just give it a few weeks
His code is on there. I personally haven't had time to try multiplayer. I'm still curious if it's any different than single player. In CIv 4 it's mostly domination wins which seems to be the AIs mentality in CivRev. I assume most multiplayer games are headed toward domination as well.
the only thing that sounds bad is that its hard to move stacks, since you have to move each unit seperatlyone space at a time. this would be virtually impossible with a turn timer going if you were going to mount an attack in multi player. It seems as if the feature of moving a stack somehow got left out. it sounds like a real pain!!!!!! ):
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.