Discussion: Game Starting Criteria (game options)

[Shaitan]

Below are the starting criteria for the Civ 3 Game of Democracy 2 game. Individual options may be debated and altered via poll prior to the start of the first turn 0 (game startup).

Civilization: GERMANY

Civilization Name: FANATIKA

World Size: HUGE

Difficulty Level: EMPEROR

Land tYPE: RANDOM

Temperature: RANDOM

Climate: RANDOM

World age: RANDOM

Barbarian Level: RANDOM

Options to enable: ALL EXCEPT "RESTART AI" CIVS AND "ACCELERATED PRODUCTION"

Rivals' Civilizations: RANDOM

Number of AI civs: 15

Have a mod create a game: NO

Edit civ stats: NO

 

[BCLG100]

woh cool this is gonna be fun

 

[GenMarshall]

Originally posted by BCLG100
woh cool this is gonna be fun

Oh yea

 

[Cyc]

Is this the new discussion area for how/when the Demogame2 should be done?

 

[BCLG100]

im not sure you could create a new thread

 

[Shaitan]

@Cyc - Yes. These are the default criteria. You can debate elements right here if you'd like to spark a change in them.

 

[BCLG100]

okay well heres a little bit of a debate could we not have random map type as this might end up with us on an archipelegio map which would cut down the goverment positions a lot especially mayors and governers

 

[BCLG100]

also just checking but are we using the 1.29 patch?

 

[Cyc]

@BCLG100 - I have to say yes to the 1.29v question.

@shaitan - I understand about the options listed above being open for discussion. My question deals more with the "Creation Day" game origins. We have a fairly good debate going in the last forum, should this thread thread be used to continue "Creation" discussions or should another thread be started?

 

[Shaitan]

That same discussion should continue. We can move that thread into this forum if you'd like as it is definitely appropriate to this game.

 

[Shaitan]

@BCLG100 - Yes, the new game will be started on the current patch level unless is is overruled through discussion/polling.

 

[Octavian X]

What is the correct adjective? I thought that some were saying we would be 'Fanatikers.' Or will we be Fanatikans?

 

[disorganizer]

I would prefer "FANATIKAANS" ;-) Though this sounds more like south-african.

FANATIKER would be the right german word for "fanatics"
and
FANATISCH SEIN would be for "to be fanatic"
FANATISCHE WELT would be "fanatic world"

but we should not do real german there, just vary the german original i would say ;-)

 

[disorganizer]

http://dict.leo.org/?search=&search...Toler=std&sectHdr=off&cmpType=relaxed&lang=en

;-)
LEO englisch-german dictionary.

 

[Cyc]

For those of you who are wondering how and when the Demogame II will start, there is a new Discussion thread, it's located here - Game Creation Day

Please go and voice your opinion.

 

[Danke]

Originally posted by disorganizer
I would prefer "FANATIKAANS" ;-) Though this sounds more like south-african.

FANATIKER would be the right german word for "fanatics"
and
FANATISCH SEIN would be for "to be fanatic"
FANATISCHE WELT would be "fanatic world"

but we should not do real german there, just vary the german original i would say ;-)

I suggest "Fanatiki", which isn't german, but is better than Fanatikers.

 

[Cyc]

Fanatikaners?

 

[Octavian X]

Fanatikaneri? Fanatik?

 

[disorganizer]

What about FANATIKS?
a anglizism, but still with german touch ;-)

 

[Shaitan]

Fanatiks sounds fine to me.