1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

Earth fifteenth Century, new warlords scenario

Discussion in 'Civ4 - Scenarios' started by Quantumf8, Jul 27, 2006.

  1. HuaXiaEmpire01

    HuaXiaEmpire01 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    11
    Location:
    Dragon's Nest
    About placing the holy cities, to me it seems they got changed automaticly even if you are editing other cities religion, for example Jerusalem is the holy city of christanity while editing any other city (like Augsburg) you delete the christianity, Jelusalem will be switched back from holy to normal city with christianity, at least that is my expierience.
     
  2. fannarh

    fannarh Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    Messages:
    21
    Nice scen. I have some Comments on it.
    Both Greenland and Iceland where Christian from the year 1000. Greenland gets way to populated in later in game while Iceland dosn´t grow has much. THis should be the be the oposite. Uppsala should also be a Christian city.
    Technology is not so good for this scen. Around 1600 most european civs have entered the industrial age. Slow down the later tech. the early techs like navigation should be accessable by all around 1510-1550. industry techs should be pushed back so only large empires can effectly research it.
     
  3. Quantumf8

    Quantumf8 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    135
    I apologize for my absence, I lost internet and lost the data on my computer, so I also lost my work :(.
    I'm working on remaking what I had from the old version, things that will be changed
    -(slightly) reworked map
    -better city placement
    -Better religion
    -Fixed shaka contact bug
    -new civs!
    -Better civics
    -more barbarians
    -Maybe more

    thats all for now!
     
  4. The Royalist

    The Royalist Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    17
    Location:
    Lolland, Danmark
    Oops... Denmark was head of the Kalmar Union, that's an insult to our glorious history :king:

    Bring the swedes down in the mud where they belong! :goodjob:
     
  5. Quantumf8

    Quantumf8 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    135
    What is UP witht he hatred between scandinavians?! aren't you norwegians, swedes and danes alike? *gets shot* ... right.. kidding >.> but anyways Gustav vasa was elected king of sweden right before the fall of union, so even though denmark led it for the most part, gustav vasa I, was, to my knowledge, more prominent, if i'm wrong, please correct me and supply information, if you're a dane, I'd appreciate input on the kalmar union, as I've not much access to resources
     
  6. Nuka-sama

    Nuka-sama :)

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    9,411
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Tokyo, JP
    Great scenario, but there is some flaws.

    Ok, its fun, but when I play as a Euro, civ, I dominate the new world without competition. In the beggining its preaty equal (except for spains army) untill I get to the New world. I conquer Aztecs, barb cities, and Inca, use all the prodouction to send units to take Australia, Japan, India, and China, and then I pretty much won. My suggestion is that England, France and Spain start out with a size 1 outpost (France gets Quebec, England gets Jamestown, Spain gets St. Augustine) with a few units, and all atwar with eachother, instead of the Ottomans, and put aggressive AI, and maybe even a Native American Civ (Iroqouis or Soux?). Maybe instead of Jamestown being English, make it the U.S. and make them vassals to england. Either way, its a great scenario :goodjob:
     
  7. Quantumf8

    Quantumf8 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    135
    Wrong time period for america, sorry, but in the newer version the new world will be soemwhat harder to invade, aztecs and incas will be implemented, they're in now, but in the newer version they'll be brought up to date. Also, Techs and production will be alot slower, as I set the game speed to marathon (time still passes year by year however) in my testing, the time rate seems to be fine, the more powerful empires research techs faster, thouygh still takes fairly long, and more primitive empires will struggle. a way to counter this if you have trouble with tech is to trade with others, unless you're one of the primitive civs (and thus meant to be without much tech. advancement) you should have acess to allies.

    another thing to remember:
    Africa and the east indies will also be good places to colonize in the newer version, so you'll have more choices as to where you want expand

    One more thing:
    I have a new civilization slot, what should I use it for? new native american civ? Papal states perhaps? New asian civ? Input is apreciated!

    hope this helps ya
     
  8. Nuka-sama

    Nuka-sama :)

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    9,411
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Tokyo, JP
    Use for Iroqouis!
     
  9. Nuka-sama

    Nuka-sama :)

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    9,411
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Tokyo, JP
    Ottomans also need more soldiers
     
  10. Mrdie

    Mrdie Founder of eRegime

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Messages:
    675
    Gender:
    Male
    The Papal States would be interesting due to having religious control over most of Europe. I'd go with them, with an Asian civ as a second choice.
     
  11. df1_2

    df1_2 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Messages:
    44
    I love this screnario! I played the Earth 1000 AD one a lot, and to get a new frech one in Warlords is great!

    Why didnt you add some new Warlords resources though, like tee and salt etc?

    Also, make it harder to get Oil! Its really fun when there are just a few places to get oil from, and you really have to plan your push.
     
  12. Balam

    Balam Sacrificial Victim

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    146
    Location:
    Guatemala
    Use for Iroquois or another North American civ please :cool:
     
  13. Jascko

    Jascko Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2006
    Messages:
    4
    Sorry, I m new here and I just wonder which folder do I have to edit this download? Should I unzip it to PublicMaps or Mod? Do I need to download mod to make this work as this is only scenario and not a mod?
     
  14. Quantumf8

    Quantumf8 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    135
    no worries, but i'm sure it's stickied around here somewhere, this is, as stated above, not a mod. Unzip the map to your public maps folder
     
  15. df1_2

    df1_2 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Messages:
    44
    This scenario is absolutly great! But Can you try to balance the civs a little more please, here is what I think:

    1. Spain has to big army.

    2. Ottomans and Chinese are both way too good, I start on Diety and is dominating.
     
  16. Nuka-sama

    Nuka-sama :)

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    9,411
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Tokyo, JP
    really? I think Ottomans need a bigger army
     
  17. The Royalist

    The Royalist Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    17
    Location:
    Lolland, Danmark
    You are quite wrong, the Danish Queen Margrethe the 1st more or less created the union which was inherited by her adopted son Eric the 7th of Pommern.

    In 1448 Sweden elects Karl the 8th as King and is in fact out of the union, but Norway remains a part of Denmark and stays an integral region of the Danish Kingdom until the Napoleonic wars.

    The Kalmar Union officially seizes to exist in 1523 Gustav Vasa becomes King, but only in Sweden, not at any time of the union is Sweden dominant, only Denmark.

    In my opinion the Scandinavian peoples are like brothers, we hate and fight each other when we are alone, but as soon as an foreign enemy appears we stand toghether till the end. That is why the Kalmar Union was created and that was why it fell again. The same thing happened in the Danish wars against Preussia, later Germany, in 1848 and 1864.

    Conclution: Let the capital be Copenhagen (København) and the leader be a danish one!
     
  18. df1_2

    df1_2 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Messages:
    44
    Balance overall is needed.

    The Barbarian cities in the middle east are too easy to take, and they have world wonders that are incredible.

    Also, when I play as French I have a really hard time to get a Great General, even though I have far more exp than 20, so my thought is that the GG comes at like 80 exp as French. When I played Ottomans I got my first GG really quick.

    This scenario is really fun though, so I hope the creator can put some more work into it. :)
     
  19. 阿里巴巴

    阿里巴巴 Warlord

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2005
    Messages:
    92
    Location:
    Shanghai, China
    I played with China-Ming, it's funny.
    Thanks for the great work and hope you can keep up the work.
     
  20. Quantumf8

    Quantumf8 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    135
    Hmm .. interesting, bear in mind the key phrase was "to my knowledge", so what would you suggest for a leader? and should I remove the swedish cities and give them to barbarians?

    as for spain, i'm working on balancign the armies and units of the nations a bit more

    edit: and for the nation slot, well it
    s been decided, you'll just have to wait and see ;)
     

Share This Page