EMO #1 - Charlemagne (OCC)

I prefer BUG and have never got BUFFY to work with it, pity because I love OCC :-(
Did you try that renaming Customassets trick I told about earlier in the thread?

I really don't get you guys complaining about BUFFY. If there's enough interest to do something, there's usually enough will to find a way to do it. Have you noticed how there's no complaining about BUFFY in BOTM threads? Instead, people there ask for help to get things working if they have problems.
 
Did you try that renaming Customassets trick I told about earlier in the thread?

I really don't get you guys complaining about BUFFY. If there's enough interest to do something, there's usually enough will to find a way to do it. Have you noticed how there's no complaining about BUFFY in BOTM threads? Instead, people there ask for help to get things working if they have problems.

I will try to put this as diplomatically as possible. Apologies if it comes across as rude.

This is not the BOTM sub-forum, where players accept that they have to fulfill certain conditions to participate in the games posted there. On Strategy and Tips sub-forum, frequented by players looking to learn and not particularly interested in the competitive nature of BOTM, forcing them to switch to BUFFY when they already use BUG + BULL or no mods at all due to a personal preference, is not going to attract many players.

This is especially true when the Strategy and Tips sub-forum has amazing series hosts like dalamb, ecuwins, Habitus, Giant Wolfman and many others who make the various series possible. The series hosted by these people are all inclusive. They go to great lengths to ensure players of all levels can play the same game, teach others and learn from others without forcing a mod onto the players.

So if you wish to host a series on here, then it will be, unfairly maybe, compared to those other series and will turn away casual gamers like me who don't like the rigidity of it all.

Just my two cents and I wish everyone who tries this well and hope they have fun :)
 
Conquest 1814 AD. Next time a better leader and less time consuming VC, please. :)

Details:
Spoiler :

*Worker-WB-warrior-library
*AH-Fishing-Mining-Writing
*Oracle 1760BC - Great library 1000BC
*Academy 1680BC
*CS 1720BC
*Oxford 350BC
*AStro 375 AD
*1st war: wang 920 AD, trebs+grens, later cannons+grens+rifles/cavalries/infantries

-Elimination order: Wang 1140 - Monty 1490 - Mao 1540 - Joao 1625 - Kublai 1695 - Brennus 1780 - Church 1812

Made plenty of stupid mistakes (like getting steel with liberalism, even though i couldn't trade iron at that point, not attacking Church earlier, too few boats etc.) that cost me some turns. Getting iron was a bit difficult but managed to get it from Joao for a hefty price.
 
I really don't get you guys complaining about BUFFY. If there's enough interest to do something, there's usually enough will to find a way to do it. Have you noticed how there's no complaining about BUFFY in BOTM threads? Instead, people there ask for help to get things working if they have problems.

To be fair, some people (myself included) do not play BOTM and therefore really aren't interested in BUFFY. In any case, having a world builder file is nice for my own personal tweaking and changes.
 
Just out of curiosity, is BUG+BULL mod better than BUFFY, or, functionaly speaking, do they pretty much accomplish the same thing? I use BUFFY simply because I once wanted to try a BOTM and liked the added functionality. I understood that it included all the extra usability of the BUG and BULL mod was incorporated in BUFFY so I didn't really need to bother with BUG+BULL.

Am I mistaken in this?
 
Just out of curiosity, is BUG+BULL mod better than BUFFY, or, functionaly speaking, do they pretty much accomplish the same thing? I use BUFFY simply because I once wanted to try a BOTM and liked the added functionality. I understood that it included all the extra usability of the BUG and BULL mod was incorporated in BUFFY so I didn't really need to bother with BUG+BULL.

Am I mistaken in this?

BUG/BULL vs. BUFFY notes:

1) BUFFY is basically BUG/BULL plus the HOF mod
2) BUFFY uses older versions of BUG/BULL (BUFFY has not been updated in a very long time and really needs an update)
3) BUFFY does have some performances issues
4) BUG/BULL can be installed directly to custom assets which allows for creation/use of saves with or without a mod
5) For this reason, BUG/BULL is better for forum games
 
4) BUG/BULL can be installed directly to custom assets which allows for creation/use of saves with or without a mod
Can you actually use vanilla BtS saves with BUG+BULL directly or do you need to tinker with them first? Would "Locked Modified Assets" hurt there?
 
I added another save with no mods needed in the first post when I finally got back to my comp. Now you can blame only the time consuming victory condition if you're not playing. :D
 
I added another save with no mods needed in the first post when I finally got back to my comp. Now you can blame only the time consuming victory condition if you're not playing. :D

Cheers!
 
I added another save with no mods needed in the first post when I finally got back to my comp. Now you can blame only the time consuming victory condition if you're not playing. :D

Thank you for posting a save that doesn't require mods! :)

I downloaded it, but the game keeps shutting off. I managed to squeeze a Screenshot before it closed and got this:
Spoiler :
Civ4ScreenShot0010_zps62fcbf8e.jpg


Can some one help me figure out how to fix that? Thanks! :)
 
1951AD Space
Spoiler :
Settled 1W
Worker > Warrior x2 > Worker > Started on Mids > Oracle > Mids > then onto the GLib & NEpic

Agriculture > AH > Mining > Masonry > Meditation > Priesthood > Writing > Math > CoL

0nCbX.jpg


Went Monotheism for some Organized Religion. To my surprise, ended up founding Judaism on T88. lololololol, wth!

1Jw5M.jpg


CS+OR is yummy, who needs stupid Marble!

SbEr6.jpg


1Gq2S.jpg


BzeED.jpg


lH0Hr.jpg


Ended up self teching everything, except Alphabet.
 
Back
Top Bottom