What do you think? This game made his duty to be diverse or this game is obvious Eurocentric-biased?
Given that in the "other caucasian" category, from line 3 down only Tamar would be widely considered "white" (i think at least), and that most would consider Cleopatra mixed race Greek-Egyptian as oppesed to "white",
and given that there seems to be about 50/50 civs that would be broadly seen as culturally "european"/"western" vs civs that wouldn't (the 3 cases that I'd imagine would cause the most contention on which group they belong to are Cleopatra, Tamar, and Suleiman),
and given the natural bias that a 4X game about building an empire will have towards european civilizations,
and given the immense impact that european civilizations have had on world history,
I'd say that there is a veeeeeeery slight bias towards european and european-adjacent civilizations in the current roster. Most of the remaining civs i think could really do with some representation aren't european (just look at my signature)
That being said, I'll echo what others are saying and point out the grouping here seems pretty wack, tho I don't think it's any sort of an attempt at bait. Why distinguish "Germanic" from "caucasian" when "caucasian" is already being used sooooo liberally? Also Kupe as East Asian is contrary to how most people would classify the Maori, which is polynesian.
Also the chart puts Cleopatra in "Hellenic" even tho she's mixed Greek-Egyptian, and also doesn't account for the fact that some of these leaders aren't necessarily racially/ethnically perfectly exemplary of the civilization they lead. Cleopatra in-game leads what is supposed to be a pre-hellenic egypt, and tho Pedro II is white, Brazil as a civilization is heavily influenced by its black and brown populations.
