Ex-Blackwater Chief Hired By The UAE To Build A "Secret Force"

Formaldehyde

Both Fair And Balanced
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
33,999
Location
USA #1
Not-so-secret desert base:

15prince2-popup.jpg


Secret Desert Force Set Up by Blackwater’s Founder

Spoiler :
ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — Late one night last November, a plane carrying dozens of Colombian men touched down in this glittering seaside capital. Whisked through customs by an Emirati intelligence officer, the group boarded an unmarked bus and drove roughly 20 miles to a windswept military complex in the desert sand.

The Colombians had entered the United Arab Emirates posing as construction workers. In fact, they were soldiers for a secret American-led mercenary army being built by Erik Prince, the billionaire founder of Blackwater Worldwide, with $529 million from the oil-soaked sheikdom.

Mr. Prince, who resettled here last year after his security business faced mounting legal problems in the United States, was hired by the crown prince of Abu Dhabi to put together an 800-member battalion of foreign troops for the U.A.E., according to former employees on the project, American officials and corporate documents obtained by The New York Times.

The force is intended to conduct special operations missions inside and outside the country, defend oil pipelines and skyscrapers from terrorist attacks and put down internal revolts, the documents show. Such troops could be deployed if the Emirates faced unrest in their crowded labor camps or were challenged by pro-democracy protests like those sweeping the Arab world this year.

The U.A.E.’s rulers, viewing their own military as inadequate, also hope that the troops could blunt the regional aggression of Iran, the country’s biggest foe, the former employees said. The training camp, located on a sprawling Emirati base called Zayed Military City, is hidden behind concrete walls laced with barbed wire. Photographs show rows of identical yellow temporary buildings, used for barracks and mess halls, and a motor pool, which houses Humvees and fuel trucks. The Colombians, along with South African and other foreign troops, are trained by retired American soldiers and veterans of the German and British special operations units and the French Foreign Legion, according to the former employees and American officials.

In outsourcing critical parts of their defense to mercenaries — the soldiers of choice for medieval kings, Italian Renaissance dukes and African dictators — the Emiratis have begun a new era in the boom in wartime contracting that began after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. And by relying on a force largely created by Americans, they have introduced a volatile element in an already combustible region where the United States is widely viewed with suspicion.

Still, it is not clear whether the project has the United States’ official blessing. Legal experts and government officials said some of those involved with the battalion might be breaking federal laws that prohibit American citizens from training foreign troops if they did not secure a license from the State Department.

Mark C. Toner, a spokesman for the department, would not confirm whether Mr. Prince’s company had obtained such a license, but he said the department was investigating to see if the training effort was in violation of American laws. Mr. Toner pointed out that Blackwater (which renamed itself Xe Services ) paid $42 million in fines last year for training foreign troops in Jordan and other countries over the years.

For Mr. Prince, the foreign battalion is a bold attempt at reinvention. He is hoping to build an empire in the desert, far from the trial lawyers, Congressional investigators and Justice Department officials he is convinced worked in league to portray Blackwater as reckless. He sold the company last year, but in April, a federal appeals court reopened the case against four Blackwater guards accused of killing 17 Iraqi civilians in Baghdad in 2007.

To help fulfill his ambitions, Mr. Prince’s new company, Reflex Responses, obtained another multimillion-dollar contract to protect a string of planned nuclear power plants and to provide cybersecurity. He hopes to earn billions more, the former employees said, by assembling additional battalions of Latin American troops for the Emiratis and opening a giant complex where his company can train troops for other governments.

Knowing that his ventures are magnets for controversy, Mr. Prince has masked his involvement with the mercenary battalion. His name is not included on contracts and most other corporate documents, and company insiders have at times tried to hide his identity by referring to him by the code name “Kingfish.” But three former employees, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of confidentiality agreements, and two people involved in security contracting described Mr. Prince’s central role.

The former employees said that in recruiting the Colombians and others from halfway around the world, Mr. Prince’s subordinates were following his strict rule: hire no Muslims.

Muslim soldiers, Mr. Prince warned, could not be counted on to kill fellow Muslims.

For Mr. Prince, a 41-year-old former member of the Navy Seals, the battalion was an opportunity to turn vision into reality. At Blackwater, which had collected billions of dollars in security contracts from the United States government, he had hoped to build an army for hire that could be deployed to crisis zones in Africa, Asia and the Middle East. He even had proposed that the Central Intelligence Agency use his company for special operations missions around the globe, but to no avail. In Abu Dhabi, which he praised in an Emirati newspaper interview last year for its “pro-business” climate, he got another chance.

Mr. Prince’s exploits, both real and rumored, are the subject of fevered discussions in the private security world. He has worked with the Emirati government on various ventures in the past year, including an operation using South African mercenaries to train Somalis to fight pirates. There was talk, too, that he was hatching a scheme last year to cap the Icelandic volcano then spewing ash across Northern Europe.

While the documents — including contracts, budget sheets and blueprints — obtained by The Times do not mention Mr. Prince, the former employees said he negotiated the U.A.E. deal. Corporate documents describe the battalion’s possible tasks: intelligence gathering, urban combat, the securing of nuclear and radioactive materials, humanitarian missions and special operations “to destroy enemy personnel and equipment.”

One document describes “crowd-control operations” where the crowd “is not armed with firearms but does pose a risk using improvised weapons (clubs and stones).”

People involved in the project and American officials said that the Emiratis were interested in deploying the battalion to respond to terrorist attacks and put down uprisings inside the country’s sprawling labor camps, which house the Pakistanis, Filipinos and other foreigners who make up the bulk of the country’s work force. The foreign military force was planned months before the so-called Arab Spring revolts that many experts believe are unlikely to spread to the U.A.E. Iran was a particular concern.

n Eye on Iran

Although there was no expectation that the mercenary troops would be used for a stealth attack on Iran, Emirati officials talked of using them for a possible maritime and air assault to reclaim a chain of islands, mostly uninhabited, in the Persian Gulf that are the subject of a dispute between Iran and the U.A.E., the former employees said. Iran has sent military forces to at least one of the islands, Abu Musa, and Emirati officials have long been eager to retake the islands and tap their potential oil reserves.

The Emirates have a small military that includes army, air force and naval units as well as a small special operations contingent, which served in Afghanistan, but over all, their forces are considered inexperienced.

To bolster the force, R2 recruited a platoon of South African mercenaries, including some veterans of Executive Outcomes, a South African company notorious for staging coup attempts or suppressing rebellions against African strongmen in the 1990s. The platoon was to function as a quick-reaction force, American officials and former employees said, and began training for a practice mission: a terrorist attack on the Burj Khalifa skyscraper in Dubai, the world’s tallest building. They would secure the situation before quietly handing over control to Emirati troops.

Emirati military officials had promised that if this first battalion was a success, they would pay for an entire brigade of several thousand men. The new contracts would be worth billions, and would help with Mr. Prince’s next big project: a desert training complex for foreign troops patterned after Blackwater’s compound in Moyock, N.C. But before moving ahead, U.A.E. military officials have insisted that the battalion prove itself in a “real world mission.”

That has yet to happen. So far, the Latin American troops have been taken off the base only to shop and for occasional entertainment.

On a recent spring night though, after months stationed in the desert, they boarded an unmarked bus and were driven to hotels in central Dubai, a former employee said. There, some R2 executives had arranged for them to spend the evening with prostitutes.
The last 3 paragraphs make it sound like a remake of The Dirty Dozen!

Now that this low-life is living in the UAE, does the US still have any control over his illegal training of foreign mercenaries as they did in the past? Should the US and the international community do more to protect the world from crazy fascist mercenaries like this ex-South African group which was finally forced to disband? Or will hired thugs always play a part in military affairs and silencing anybody who dissents in Africa and the Middle East?
 
tl;dr. Seriously, tl.

Secret? I haven't seen anything claiming that it's secret?

It's simply the Emirs who want a military force not loyal to the people which they can use to quell any democratic uprisings.
 
Training Somalis to fight pirates and training security personnel to protect nuclear power plants? Those bastards. :mad:
 
Training Somalis to fight pirates and training security personnel to protect nuclear power plants? Those bastards. :mad:

I am more concerned about the "and put down internal revolts" thing of the whole article.
 
This is a touching episode of cooperation between the USA and the Muslim world in the sea of mutual hatred. Or something.
 
Would that be before or after it became an authoritarian regime instead of a democracy?
 
As it stands now. If tomorrow Norway was filled with revolts, would the poster want to see those revolts put down?
I'm pretty sure most European democracies rather frown on using mercenaries to kill their citizens in general, much less for "revolting". I think that even holds true for the US, at least under most administrations.
 
If revolts started in Norway, would you want them to be put down?
If a revolt managed to start in Norway, there would have to be something extremely wrong with the current government.

So I'd join the revolt of course, like all good Norwegians would have.

Seriously though, the idea that the military is not loyal to the people is very troubling. That is one of the strongest and most frequently used arguments to keep conscription in Norway: As long as the bulk of the soldiers are in fact normal Norwegians, who stays in the armed forces for a year or two, and who has friends and family amongst the general populace, it is extremely unlikely that the armed forces could be used to usurp the power.

Which is precisely why the Emirs like the idea of a 1000-man, foreign mercenary army. Strong and loyal enough to quell any internal revolts, and small enough that they can't realistically threaten the Emirs themselves.
 
Still, it is not clear whether the project has the United States’ official blessing. Legal experts and government officials said some of those involved with the battalion might be breaking federal laws that prohibit American citizens from training foreign troops if they did not secure a license from the State Department.
so at most they can revoke his us citizenship i guess. he can do basically whatever he wants and theres no way to really stop him.
 
I'm pretty sure most European democracies rather frown on using mercenaries to kill their citizens in general, much less for "revolting". I think that even holds true for the US, at least under most administrations.

European Democracies frown upon revolting? Isn't the French way periodic revolution? You mean there haven't been violent revolts of sorts in Greece, or France, or in Northern Ireland/UK? There weren't revolts in the Balkans, or in the Ukraine, or in Belarus? I'm less interested in the implement used to put down a revolt than the act of putting down a revolt itself.

Cheetah said:
If a revolt managed to start in Norway, there would have to be something extremely wrong with the current government.

So I'd join the revolt of course, like all good Norwegians would have.

This is presumptuous and muddled. What if, like Greece, the social welfare programs in Norway became untenable and revolts broke out due to austerity measures that had to be put in place to keep the country functioning? Or better yet, what if a group of people began revolting over conscription? Would there be merit in the revolt? Would there be merit in laying it down by violence? If there would be merit in putting down a revolt in Norway, would would be that justification, and why could these justifications not be applied to the Emir in the UAE?
 
European Democracies frown upon revolting? Isn't the French way periodic revolution? You mean there haven't been violent revolts of sorts in Greece, or France, or in Northern Ireland/UK? There weren't revolts in the Balkans, or in the Ukraine, or in Belarus? I'm less interested in the implement used to put down a revolt than the act of putting down a revolt itself.
And yet they all manage to deal with these "revolts" without calling in mercenaries to kill their own citizens. The only time that actually seems necessary is when it is a brutal authoritarian regime in some hopelessly backward country that doesn't even trust its own military and police. And most of the time, the victims are merely expressing their dissent to that very same regime.
 
This is presumptuous and muddled. What if, like Greece, the social welfare programs in Norway became untenable and revolts broke out due to austerity measures that had to be put in place to keep the country functioning? Or better yet, what if a group of people began revolting over conscription? Would there be merit in the revolt? Would there be merit in laying it down by violence? If there would be merit in putting down a revolt in Norway, would would be that justification, and why could these justifications not be applied to the Emir in the UAE?
Umm... right..

I always like to try to answer a hypothetical within the settings of a hypothetical, but I'm having a really hard time doing that here.

If the social welfare programs of Norway ever becomes untenable and nobody does anything about it before it is so late that we have to put in some insane austerity measure there better damn well be a revolt! For that to happen the government has to be incompetent and/or corrupt, at least half our bureaucrats have to go insane, the whole media has to be plotting to destroy the state and the whole populace has to have adopted a mindset more in common with Greece or Pakistan than with diligence and frugality associated with Lutheran traditions.

There is not a chance in hell that there will be a revolt over conscription in Norway. Whether or not it is a good thing is debated from time to time, but it is in no way a hot issue. Only 1 in 6 18-year olds are conscripted these days, and many are actually contacting the Armed Forces asking when they will be requested to serve.

You have to understand that Norway is very well set. The educational level of the populace is very high, people are generally well-traveled and while I have my doubts sometimes, most people are intelligent, interested in politics and engaged in how this country is actually run. We have an extremely high social capital, originating in us being a small country with a small population where "everybody knew everybody". Dugnader is still fairly common, there is little crime and we prefer that our police is not armed. Even in the midst of a global economic crisis, we have little poverty, almost no unemployment, a housing market that is still rising, highly professional and productive workers that are able to export with a profit even when our currency is way to expensive, and while a lot of people have borrowed a bit too much during the last decade, many still have money saved up, and if we'll ever need some extra cash the state itself has so much money that we own 2% of all publicly traded stocks in the entire world!

There is just so very, very little possibilities for revolts to take place in Norway currently. If a revolt ever did take place, a lot of people has had to to a lot of stupid things. So much so that a revolt might be the most sensible thing.

The last time we had anything resembling a revolt was 2,000 striking workers in 1931, where 200 police and soldiers were set in to control them. No one were killed, but a few were wounded and 24 people got fined.

Anyone stupid enough to turn to violence will quickly find the entire populace to have turned against them.

(And even if that wasn't enough, any revolt would first have to debate how to spell it! ;) )

A revolt just isn't possible in Norway. And if one ever happens, you can be sure that there is a damn good reason for it.

So no, there is no merit in any revolt here, and there is definitely no merit in laying it down with violence.
 
Why can't the US be allowed to export evil if it wants?
 
Back
Top Bottom