Fallujah: The Truth at Last

zulu9812

The Newbie Nightmare
Joined
Jan 29, 2002
Messages
6,388
Location
Athens of the North
from http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8093.htm
Fallujah: The Truth at Last

Doctor Salam Ismael took aid to Fallujah last month. This is a report of his visit.


02/17/05 - "SW" - IT WAS the smell that first hit me, a smell that is difficult to describe, and one that will never leave me. It was the smell of death. Hundreds of corpses were decomposing in the houses, gardens and streets of Fallujah. Bodies were rotting where they had fallen-bodies of men, women and children, many half-eaten by wild dogs.

A wave of hate had wiped out two-thirds of the town, destroying houses and mosques, schools and clinics. This was the terrible and frightening power of the US military assault.

The accounts I heard over the next few days will live with me forever. You may think you know what happened in Fallujah. But the truth is worse than you could possibly have imagined.

In Saqlawiya, one of the makeshift refugee camps that surround Fallujah, we found a 17 year old woman. "I am Hudda Fawzi Salam Issawi from the Jolan district of Fallujah," she told me. "Five of us, including a 55 year old neighbour, were trapped together in our house in Fallujah when the siege began.

"On 9 November American marines came to our house. My father and the neighbour went to the door to meet them. We were not fighters. We thought we had nothing to fear. I ran into the kitchen to put on my veil, since men were going to enter our house and it would be wrong for them to see me with my hair uncovered. "This saved my life. As my father and neighbour approached the door, the Americans opened fire on them. They died instantly.

"Me and my 13 year old brother hid in the kitchen behind the fridge. The soldiers came into the house and caught my older sister. They beat her. Then they shot her. But they did not see me. Soon they left, but not before they had destroyed our furniture and stolen the money from my father's pocket."

Hudda told me how she comforted her dying sister by reading verses from the Koran. After four hours her sister died. For three days Hudda and her brother stayed with their murdered relatives. But they were thirsty and had only a few dates to eat. They feared the troops would return and decided to try to flee the city. But they were spotted by a US sniper.

Hudda was shot in the leg, her brother ran but was shot in the back and died instantly. "I prepared myself to die," she told me. "But I was found by an American woman soldier, and she took me to hospital." She was eventually reunited with the surviving members of her family.

I also found survivors of another family from the Jolan district. They told me that at the end of the second week of the siege the US troops swept through the Jolan. The Iraqi National Guard used loudspeakers to call on people to get out of the houses carrying white flags, bringing all their belongings with them. They were ordered to gather outside near the Jamah al-Furkan mosque in the centre of town.

On 12 November Eyad Naji Latif and eight members of his family-one of them a six month old child-gathered their belongings and walked in single file, as instructed, to the mosque.

When they reached the main road outside the mosque they heard a shout, but they could not understand what was being shouted. Eyad told me it could have been "now" in English. Then the firing began. US soldiers appeared on the roofs of surrounding houses and opened fire. Eyad's father was shot in the heart and his mother in the chest.

They died instantly. Two of Eyad's brothers were also hit, one in the chest and one in the neck. Two of the women were hit, one in the hand and one in the leg. Then the snipers killed the wife of one of Eyad's brothers. When she fell her five year old son ran to her and stood over her body. They shot him dead too. Survivors made desperate appeals to the troops to stop firing.

But Eyad told me that whenever one of them tried to raise a white flag they were shot. After several hours he tried to raise his arm with the flag. But they shot him in the arm. Finally he tried to raise his hand. So they shot him in the hand.

The five survivors, including the six month old child, lay in the street for seven hours. Then four of them crawled to the nearest home to find shelter. The next morning the brother who was shot in the neck also managed to crawl to safety. They all stayed in the house for eight days, surviving on roots and one cup of water, which they saved for the baby. On the eighth day they were discovered by some members of the Iraqi National Guard and taken to hospital in Fallujah. They heard the Americans were arresting any young men, so the family fled the hospital and finally obtained treatment in a nearby town.

They do not know in detail what happened to the other families who had gone to the mosque as instructed. But they told me the street was awash with blood. I had come to Fallujah in January as part of a humanitarian aid convoy funded by donations from Britain.

Our small convoy of trucks and vans brought 15 tons of flour, eight tons of rice, medical aid and 900 pieces of clothing for the orphans. We knew that thousands of refugees were camped in terrible conditions in four camps on the outskirts of town.

There we heard the accounts of families killed in their houses, of wounded people dragged into the streets and run over by tanks, of a container with the bodies of 481 civilians inside, of premeditated murder, looting and acts of savagery and cruelty that beggar belief.

Through the ruins That is why we decided to go into Fallujah and investigate. When we entered the town I almost did not recognise the place where I had worked as a doctor in April 2004, during the first siege.

We found people wandering like ghosts through the ruins. Some were looking for the bodies of relatives. Others were trying to recover some of their possessions from destroyed homes.

Here and there, small knots of people were queuing for fuel or food. In one queue some of the survivors were fighting over a blanket.

I remember being approached by an elderly woman, her eyes raw with tears. She grabbed my arm and told me how her house had been hit by a US bomb during an air raid. The ceiling collapsed on her 19 year old son, cutting off both his legs.

She could not get help. She could not go into the streets because the Americans had posted snipers on the roofs and were killing anyone who ventured out, even at night.

She tried her best to stop the bleeding, but it was to no avail. She stayed with him, her only son, until he died. He took four hours to die.

Fallujah's main hospital was seized by the US troops in the first days of the siege. The only other clinic, the Hey Nazzal, was hit twice by US missiles. Its medicines and medical equipment were all destroyed. There were no ambulances-the two ambulances that came to help the wounded were shot up and destroyed by US troops.

We visited houses in the Jolan district, a poor working class area in the north western part of the city that had been the centre of resistance during the April siege.

This quarter seemed to have been singled out for punishment during the second siege. We moved from house to house, discovering families dead in their beds, or cut down in living rooms or in the kitchen. House after house had furniture smashed and possessions scattered.

In some places we found bodies of fighters, dressed in black and with ammunition belts.

But in most of the houses, the bodies were of civilians. Many were dressed in housecoats, many of the women were not veiled-meaning there were no men other than family members in the house. There were no weapons, no spent cartridges.

It became clear to us that we were witnessing the aftermath of a massacre, the cold-blooded butchery of helpless and defenceless civilians.

Nobody knows how many died. The occupation forces are now bulldozing the neighbourhoods to cover up their crime. What happened in Fallujah was an act of barbarity. The whole world must be told the truth.

Dr Salam Ismael, now 28 years old, was head of junior doctors in Baghdad before the invasion of Iraq. He was in Fallujah in April 2004 where he treated casualties of the assault on the city.

At the end of 2004 he came to Britain to collect funds for an aid convoy to Fallujah. Now the British government does not want Dr Salam Ismael’s testimony to be heard.

He was due to come here last week to speak at trade union and anti-war meetings. But he was refused entry. The reason given was that he received expenses, covering the basic costs of his trip, when he came to Britain last year and this constitutes “illegal working”.

Dr Salam Ismael merely wishes to speak the truth. Yet it seems the freedom that Bush and Blair claim to champion in Iraq does not extend to allowing its citizens to travel freely.

Legal challenges, supported by the Stop the War Coalition, were launched this week in an effort to allow Dr Salam Ismael to come to Britain.

This article was first published by www.socialistworker.co.uk


Copyright © Socialist Worker. All rights reserved. You may republish under the following conditions: An active link to the original publication must be provided. You must not alter, edit or remove any text within the article, including this copyright notice.

This is rather worrying. Whilst it seems that some US soldiers are 'the good guys', such as the woman who took the girl to be reunited with her (admittedly thinned) family, the general picture of December's Fallujah battle is absolute massacre.
 
I'm far from agreeing with Iraq2, and I have no doubt a lot of innocent Civilians died in Faludjia; not only to bombs, but also to US soldiers who recently seem to open fire too lightly (as shown again last night...).
But, this sounds like primitive anti-US propaganda to me:
"Soon they left, but not before they had destroyed our furniture and stolen the money from my father's pocket."
I'm sure they really needed that booty ;).
Sorry, I refuse to believe such over-exaggerations.

Btw, if you google for Dr. Salaam, you'll find surprising differences in his vita (all links relate to that article, of course): Sometimes he's 28, sometimes 29; sometimes he brought British Aid, sometimes he worked at Falludjia Hospital...
And if you search for his "Doctors for Iraqi Society" - you won't find any references.
This kind of propaganda is counter-productive.
 
Well, I did a google on Dr Salim Ismael and came up with none of the discrepencies you did, and the "Doctors for Iraqi Society" was founded by one Shaheen Riadh Jihad Abdullah, details of which can be found here
 
Whether or not the particular events described here really happened or are just propaganda, you can be sure that similar things took place in Fallujah. Its impossible for a war machine like the US military to attack a town full of civilians and NOT have things like this happen.
 
Who said that? Not me. Im backing you up here. Im saying that even if people want to claim that this is just propaganda, there can be no doubt that many similar atrocities did take place. Let me make it clearer: I wish armies wouldnt attack towns filled with civilians, because these things are unavoidable when they do.
 
Oh, ok, cheers. However, I don't believe that they are unavoidable - unavoidable would mean that no one should be held to account.
 
zulu9812 said:
Soon they left, but not before they had destroyed our furniture and stolen the money from my father's pocket.
I'm sure they stole at least 1500 Iraqi Dinar so they at least had 1 US dollar, right? Why would any US soldier want Iraqi money? This is just one example from the article that shows that the entire thing was probably fabricated. This type of BS does not help the anti-war movement. There are very many valid reasons for being against this war, and the way it is being handled. Any source that distributes lies and propaganda hurts the anti-war movement, and helps no one. I think discovering the truth about what happened is much more important than creating fiction to make the US look bad. The US does that well enough on its own.
 
Sanaz said:
I'm sure they stole at least 1500 Iraqi Dinar so they at least had 1 US dollar, right? Why would any US soldier want Iraqi money?

They probably just rifled through his pockets and took everything they found without discerning too much - after all, what use does the dead man have for it?
 
Whats the matter with the socialist worker and their ilk? Don't they understand that these troops are just doing their duty, they were told to take the city so they took it while taking relatively heavy casualties. They gave the citizens of the city weeks of warning that they were coming, an act which actually allowed a lot of terrorists to escape, and while civillians were inevitably killed there is very little evidence other than biased accounts such as this that US troops actively targeted civillians.
I wonder how many of the stopthewar coalition have been in a warzone, they dont understand or take into account the confusion that you have, the fear that you feel and the impact of your friends being wounded and sometimes killed.
In my opinion the US troops did a good and humane job in Fallujah afterall the could have just levelled the city without exposing significant ground forces but they didn't because despite all of the propaganda the British and American troops aren't idescriminate murderers that take their tactics straight form the SS handbook, they are professional soldiers.

The anti-Army/soldier view of the stop the war coaltion and the socialistworker worry me their views at times seem to applaud the killing of British troops. This is not to say that all anti war people are like this as I myself was against British involvement in the war but I think a lot of the Stop the war coalition have moved from being anti war to being for the Muslims that are killing British troops.
 
Britannia said:
The anti-Army/soldier view of the stop the war coaltion and the socialistworker worry me their views at times seem to applaud the killing of British troops. This is not to say that all anti war people are like this as I myself was against British involvement in the war but I think a lot of the Stop the war coalition have moved from being anti war to being for the Muslims that are killing British troops.

Care to find some evidence to back that up?
 
Originally Posted by zulu9812
Care to find some evidence to back that up?

Well it just that everytime I see one of the stopthewar coalition interviewed or people from Respect who are supporters of it they seem to defend the Iraqi resistance.
Like this statement from George Galloway on Newsnight:

"George Galloway(on Newsnight): Actually, the Iraqi resistance does not target its own civilians. But the people that are being fought by the
resistance in Iraq are the people that are working for the occupation."

Which is false as the Iraqi people that they targeted that were trying to vote were not working for the coalition.

From the website of Respect, leading members of the Stop the War
movement. http://www.respectcoalition.org/index.php?ite=512

Conference notes:

1.That the defeat of the US led occupation of Iraq is critical if the
global economic and political offensive begun by the US state and its
allies at the time of the first Gulf War is to be defeated.


2. That the resistance in Iraq is engaged in a battle to liberate the country. That resistance is composed of elements which are Islamic, nationalist and socialist. It is a national liberation movement.

3. That the anti-war movement has a crucial role to play in forcing the
imperialist governments to leave Iraq.

4. That while 71 percent of the British people want a date to be set
for the withdrawal of troops from Iraq only 14 percent of delegates to
the Labour Party conference voted for such a resolution


Conference believes:

1.The British and US led occupation of Iraq should end and that the
troops should be brought home immediately.

2. That the Iraqi resistance deserves the support of the international
anti-war movement
-This is actually far worse than I was expecting, they support a resistance movement that is killing British troops!
 
Britannia said:
From the website of Respect, leading members of the Stop the War
movement. http://www.respectcoalition.org/index.php?ite=512

Well, I for one wasn't aware that Respect lead me or any other individual or group involved in the anti-war campaign. You'll notice that 'anti-war campaign' is uncapitalised. That's because it does not have the hieraechy you, the police or the government wish it did.

Britannia said:
2. That the Iraqi resistance deserves the support of the international
anti-war movement
-This is actually far worse than I was expecting, they support a resistance movement that is killing British troops!

At some point though, it has to be recognised that we are the aggessors; we are the invaders; we are the killers and torturers of civilians. Being British does not gives us the moral high ground. Besides, George Galloway's view is way more extreme (although that doesn't mean it's incorrect; it could be, in that he may just be further along the raod than the rest of us) - it certainly isn't what other groups think; such as People & Planet, SSP, G8 Alternatives, CND, etc.
 
Sarevok said:
If you got this from a more credible news source I might me more willing to bother reading what you have up here.

Would you care to share your experiences of the Socialist Worker, the Stop the War Coalition and the Information Clearing House that sustain your incredulity?
 
Britannia said:
I wonder how many of the stopthewar coalition have been in a warzone, they dont understand or take into account the confusion that you have, the fear that you feel and the impact of your friends being wounded and sometimes killed.

Ah, that old chestnut again. It's not even a good argument, but I have to deal with it again, and again, and again. Being under stress does not make it acceptable to set a trap for families and then massacre them. When you hold other people's lives in your hands, you have a duty to get theings right.

The argument you put is also closely linked to the notion that I am not qualified to comment, since I haven't been there. However, surely the people who have been there, i.e. the Iraqis mentioned in the article, are qualified to comment?
 
Britannia said:
Whats the matter with the socialist worker and their ilk? Don't they understand that these troops are just doing their duty, they were told to take the city so they took it while taking relatively heavy casualties. They gave the citizens of the city weeks of warning that they were coming, an act which actually allowed a lot of terrorists to escape, and while civillians were inevitably killed there is very little evidence other than biased accounts such as this that US troops actively targeted civillians.

Indeed, they are doing thir duty, but it doesn't mean that bad events dont happen. Out of all the us soldiers out there in the field, at least a small percentage of them are either stupid, traumatised or sadistic, just like any regular citizen. Its inevitable that some regretfull things are gonna happen, just like in any other war since the beggining of civilization.

Britannia said:
I wonder how many of the stopthewar coalition have been in a warzone, they dont understand or take into account the confusion that you have, the fear that you feel and the impact of your friends being wounded and sometimes killed.

Have you? (no sarcasm, I'm interested)

Britannia said:
In my opinion the US troops did a good and humane job in Fallujah afterall the could have just levelled the city without exposing significant ground forces but they didn't because despite all of the propaganda the British and American troops aren't idescriminate murderers that take their tactics straight form the SS handbook, they are professional soldiers.

I personally dont buy all the stuff from those articles, but I'll never believe that invading troops, in any war, might do what you would call "a humane job". War and fairness have nothing to do with each other. When you go to war, you have to acknowledge and accept the burden that many inhumane things are gonna happen. The troops aren't indescriminate murderers, but they are human, and in this kind of environment it is innevitable that some of them will snap and do stupid stuff. Only, doing stupid stuff with a riffle in your hand and nobody to stop you is pretty dangerous. US soldiers aren't worst then other soldiers, but they are still soldiers. Professional? yes, but professionalism doesn't exculde stupidity or incompetence.

Britannia said:
The anti-Army/soldier view of the stop the war coaltion and the socialistworker worry me their views at times seem to applaud the killing of British troops. This is not to say that all anti war people are like this as I myself was against British involvement in the war but I think a lot of the Stop the war coalition have moved from being anti war to being for the Muslims that are killing British troops.

People often side with the opressed people. In this war, the biggest loosers are the Iraq citizens, so its only normal to have sympathy for them.

That being said, I personally really dont applaud any soldier being killed, be it a muslim, an american or an english.
 
Well, I have no doubt that horrible incidents have happened, BUT, I don't think that such incidents could happen on purpose.

I mean, come on, the soldiers are humans as well, it'd be very difficult for a whole group/team of soldiers to do such things and get away with it, without anyone reporting it: the Army also has rules about a soldiers' legal/illegal actions.

Abu Graib was true, it was reported and you know the rest, but could such things go away without anyone notice it? I mean, this is not supposed to have happen on an isolated jail, right?

It'd take much of coincidence that a certain number of soldiers with the same attitude/character happened to form a group and that they would have assasin-like behavior(like they were coming from Mafia's ranks).

I don't know what to say, maybe/definetly the soldiers are very cruel some times, but such specific incidents is hard for my humane side to accept.
 
zulu9812 said:
Ah, that old chestnut again. It's not even a good argument, but I have to deal with it again, and again, and again. Being under stress does not make it acceptable to set a trap for families and then massacre them. When you hold other people's lives in your hands, you have a duty to get theings right.

I dont think the question is to know if its acceptable or not. Soldiers aren't professional war machines, they are humans, and its hard to figure how its like to be in the field when you haven't experienced it.

But the fact of a matter is: these things happen, and someone (Bush?, Rumsfeld?) needs to accept it and take responsibility for it rather to try to deny their existance.
 
Originally Posted by zulu9812
Well, I for one wasn't aware that Respect lead me or any other individual or group involved in the anti-war campaign. You'll notice that 'anti-war campaign' is uncapitalised. That's because it does not have the hieraechy you, the police or the government wish it did.

I meant a leading role as in they seem to have great influence withinthe anti war movement and as for it having no "command structure" the police and government may wish it had one but I don't, why would I?

At some point though, it has to be recognised that we are the aggessors; we are the invaders; we are the killers and torturers of civilians. Being British does not gives us the moral high ground. Besides, George Galloway's view is way more extreme (although that doesn't mean it's incorrect; it could be, in that he may just be further along the raod than the rest of us) - it certainly isn't what other groups think; such as People & Planet, SSP, G8 Alternatives, CND, etc.

The soldiers are simply doing their duty, they are following the orders of a democratically elected government and the majority are neither killers or torturers of civillians. The once that do torture have and will be prosecuted and as for killing civillians that is only to be expected in any warzone, like I said before in the confusion and atmosphere of combat mistakes are made but British troops do not target civillians.
For me supporting a group that is killing your own soldiers is hard to understand, I just know that if British citizens were supporting an organisation that was trying to kill me while I was in the army I would have some words to say to him/her when I got back.


Ah, that old chestnut again. It's not even a good argument, but I have to deal with it again, and again, and again. Being under stress does not make it acceptable to set a trap for families and then massacre them. When you hold other people's lives in your hands, you have a duty to get theings right.

Again British sodiers do not set up traps for families then massacre them, we do not target civillians. Being under stress makes you make mistakes and in a combat situation civillians can die when you make mistakes, that is not the same as killing a unarmed man in cold blood the killing of civillians is unfortunate yes but in war there will always be civillians killed.

The argument you put is also closely linked to the notion that I am not qualified to comment, since I haven't been there. However, surely the people who have been there, i.e. the Iraqis mentioned in the article, are qualified to comment?

I never said you weren't qualified to comment I said that some people do not take into account the confusion and stress of being under fire especially in places where your role is unclear such as Iraq, I can assure you that if these people were in the soldiers position they would make exactly the same mistakes.
 
Back
Top Bottom