As far as the Cultural Department initiating a vote for Mobilization, I have to agree with Shaitan. My two cents is that Mobilization would have negative effects for the Cultural Department, so why would they ever want to call a vote for its enactment?
I posted the following in the poll thread for the acceptance of the COS into the COl "en masse". I know that I said I would support the move, and I do, I just think its too soon now. I am comparing the Constitution ver. 1-10 to the version you listed in the poll, version C2-2 (something like that) at this time. The poll may pass, but I don't think it was posted properly. We should spend the rest of this month passing section by section. Anyway, her's the other post:
Donsig's idea is a good one. Dis' idea is good after a discussion of each "article" or standard.
!. Sorry, Shaitan, I have been quite busy the last two weeks. I try to keep up, but sometimes its difficult to realize what's being proposed/reviewed/polled at the moment.
2.I'm still waiting for the public to join into the discussions. We need more input from the citizens. I quess I waited a little too long for their input. My fault.
I really do think we should take the first standard and post it. Discuss it. "Are there any negative comments about this standard? Or can it be passed on to a law?"
Btw, I am working with (or looking at) the Costitution ver. CV1-10.
The standards are split into 2 catagories - the COL and the COS. If you are refering to the COL being tested during the previous Constitution, how do you explain Section E (I think) about the Judicial Branch? It didn't exist then. If we take each section (the whole section and discuss its merits and drawbacks, we can then fine tune it and paas it into law. The COS in this version are only standards and will have to wait until all of the Sections in the COL are reviewed. Anyway, this is the way I see it.