C~G
Untouchable
- Joined
- May 24, 2006
- Messages
- 4,146
I have said this before but I believe not much fruitation will come out of this. This issue ain't that interesting for me. Maybe couple years back it would have been but now.... You can believe as you want and probably can convince quite many people it is so. It doesn't matter to me though. We all have our beliefs.Civrules said:Oh please, we want a discussion. Don’t get resentful just because people are disagreeing with you. Quitting isn’t an option. I love this discussion.
No, my argument is so strong that I use intentionally "if" so I don't sound arrogant, or do I need to be and play alpha-male to you too before you belief me.Civrules said:Your argument is so weak that you automatically use the word “if,” instead of “when,” because you just KNOW what you are saying will NEVER happen.

And I thought I was saying that there's more to it than just simple analysis that Tony Little's workout machine builds up stamina because gurus says so. Funny me.Civrules said:There will always be a VERY distinguishable line between those who “get it” and those who do not. It boils down to people’s interests. You can say “if” all you want to try to prove a hypothetical point, but that just isn’t good enough.
All I wanted to prove was that beyond the acknowledgement that it's about game and you have to get out of that "nice guy/jerk"-mindset is that everything else is also hypothetical. Especially the things how they have "biological base".
But since I don't want to personally repeat myself and hell don't want you to do it either, it's better just leave it here. If we don't understand each other, then it's fine.
Never said such thing.He would be exactly where you want me to believe most unattractive guys are. At a huge disadvantage. Sorry, that just isn’t true.
It is just one of the advantages you can play with for your advantage. But you make it sound like it isn't a factor.
Well, I didn't want to dig deeper regarding how this all has to do with other issues of human psychology since right from the start I have been said how wrong I am. So I don't bother.Civrules said:The fact that you say that you could dig deeper kind of makes your credibility shrink.
Yes the shot hit my feet and pierced through your skull. Happy now?Civrules said:And why did you have to shoot yourself in the foot by starting the “fake breast” argument? We ALL know that guys are clearly more automatically attracted to a woman’s looks and physique.

In fact you just proved for me why you don't actually get it what is behind all this.
I give one hint: The whole idea of this "alpha-male" thing is faking it to be one just like with fake breasts. If you know the theories what breasts mean to men it actually doesn't have lot to do how "fine" they look only but sometimes it is just that.
Again. Never said such thing. I said that I agree about confidence but that's it.Civrules said:So I’ll just keep pounding away saying that an exception does not render ALL of this untrue.
I remember saying that we don't know which is the weight of these characteristics. There are certain characteristics that ultimately tend to attract more women compared to other characteristics but that doesn't help the people that don't have those characteristics. This, if we disregard the whole confidence and flirtation thing.Civrules said:Girls are not attracted to looks nearly as much as they are attracted to a plethora of other characteristics.
So apparently for you the deal goes like this: Men are attracted to outgoing fun busty girls while women are attracted to lame looking men with confidence that flirt. What happens when room is full of them both?I don’t understand your argument of “more than one alpha males in a situation.” Aren’t there more than one highly attractive girls in certain situations also?
If there are, which do you think I’ll choose? The attractive girl who is boring or the attractive girl who is outgoing and fun? (Ooh, now we start getting into people’s characters having an impact on attraction, no?)
Then there's example the sense of humour factor, some say it's important, others say it's not.
And I already mentioned earlier that all the other characteristics of men affect the process which you are now admitting to happen.
"By the experts" is rather problematic when it comes to non-scientific social studies.Civrules said:Why would I leave the gurus out of it?
I think it's lot based into belief of truthfullness of those gurus and certain basic principles that make appear these theories to be true all or at least most of the time. Sleight of hand that is.
Like I said there's nothing wrong to believing into it but representing these all things as absolute facts is...quite a stretch.
I don't even understand what you mean by that?Civrules said:They don’t offer more proof than you are comfortable with, now do they?
I happened to notice that confidence plays big part how women get attracted before I even read any books about it but I believe the choosing of partner in long run is different issue along with that I cannot agree about stretching the theory that it will ultimately save "man"kind or how it seen based into biology. These are wild guesses which have no truth whatsoever to them even if simple flirtation techniques presented by the same author appear to work while dating.
It depends in what they are successfull in. If they are looking for perfect mates, they cannot be successfull all the time since one time would be enoughCivrules said:Why do you think the gurus are successful?

If they are playing for fun of it just to get some the reason is that they play it early, often and loud. (Marketing strategy)
Have you thought that maybe these gurus have qualities that you can never possess? Or they use these things in specific circumstances to get specific results or interpret them as they want them to be?
Or just maybe they want to make money with these "enlarge your ego" books?

It was friendly laugh.Civrules said:Ooooh, now you are just trying to push my buttons, aren’t ya?
Don’t be so manipulative. And don’t try to inspire hatred in someone else for your own advantage.

Absolutely no offence meant. You weren't doing so crappy job with the giving advice I was trying to merely pointing out why it's still suspectible we don't see even fragment of the whole picture.
Good for you.Civrules said:I am not forcing this down anybody’s throat.
If you like it and if it works for you, great. If not. Great. I couldn’t care less.
The thing is that I’ve followed it and I sure as hell won’t revert back to my previous mindset.
Since I don't know about your previous mindset I exactly know what was wrong with it.
And I absolutely agree about the bolded part.
What is so funny is that I don't even disagree that much about it only thing I did was to point out the rather apparent logical fallacies which seem to escape again and again from both of you.
You can as well say that the game changes depending on your social circle because everyone is human.Nanocyborgasm said:No, the game doesn't change depending on your social circle, because everyone is human.

I do back down now and you two can keep giving these advices to people.
Sorry for interrupting.