GloFish: FunFish or FrankenFish?

Achinz

Hermit of Huangshan
Joined
Oct 16, 2001
Messages
2,232
Location
World's most livable city
I first came across the story in the January edition of New Scientist. Here's a summary from the report in http://www.fact-index.com/g/gl/glofish.html .

The GloFish is a genetically-modified zebrafish with a bright red fluorescent color. It is the first genetically modified (GM) animal to be engineered for sale as a pet.

In 1999, Dr Gong Zhiyuan and colleagues at the National University of Singapore took a gene from a jellyfish that naturally produced a green fluorescent protein and grafted it on to the zebrafish genome. This caused the fish's organs to glow brightly behind its translucent skin. Shortly thereafter a team of Taiwanese researchers... succeeded in creating a zebrafish with a fluorescent red color by adding genes from a species of coral...

In 2002, Taiwan became the first country to authorize sales of a GM organism as a pet. One hundred thousand fish were sold in less than a month at $18.60 apiece...

The GloFish was introduced to the American market in January, 2004 ...claiming that it needs no federal permit to do so. The move was met by protests from environmental groups, who call the GloFish "frankenfish"...

According to the CFS, recent research also revealed that the GloFish was engineered to contain animal and human viruses and as well as antibiotic resistance genes, all of which it claims can pose human and animal health hazards.

However, the official statement of the U.S. FDA (made on the 9th of December 2003) says:

"Because tropical aquarium fish are not used for food purposes, they pose no threat to the food supply. There is no evidence that these genetically engineered zebra danio fish pose any more threat to the environment than their unmodified counterparts which have long been widely sold in the United States. In the absence of a clear risk to the public health, the FDA finds no reason to regulate these particular fish."

So is GloFish a FunPet or a FrankenPet?
 
It can't be worse than injecting the fish with poisonous (animal doesn't live long) inks to achieve the same end result - something they have been doing for years.
 
Again with this story? Oh well, these things fizzle out after a day never to be seen again.

Anyway...I don't see what the point of getting a fish to glow in the dark would be...
 
Originally posted by The Yankee
Again with this story? Oh well, these things fizzle out after a day never to be seen again.
I hope it's not the GloFish one you're referring to as I've done my conscientious search of OT and found no refs to it.

Anyway...I don't see what the point of getting a fish to glow in the dark would be...
I take it you're not into aquariums and colourful fish? It's got quite a following and I should think these enthusiasts would happily part with the $18 odd to be mesmerized.

It can be catching though, if you've been exposed eg even to the virtual kind such as screensavers. :)
 
Originally posted by Achinz
I hope it's not the GloFish one you're referring to as I've done my conscientious search of OT and found no refs to it.

Here
and here
 
I tried glow in the dark fish. I also tried the search button at the top of the page and typed in fish and my name, since I knew that I already made a topic on it.
 
OK, I've perused the posts in the two threads but there has not been much discussion about the ethics and possible environmental impact of the GM aspects.

So I guess the rationale for this thread would be questions specifcally on these issues rather than just the "Oh, lovely colour" comments.
 
You can get naturally glowing fish with the Neon Tetras.
 
Yes but these things apparently actually glow :eek:
 
I'm thinking recessed wall-height tank, sufficient numbers of these beauties, then turn off the lights. You could create a very romantic atmosphere with them. :)
 
To get away from the focus of the earlier threads, I shoud quote some concerns about GM animals raised in the New scientist article for discussion.


Used wisely, genetic modification could help put right some fo the excesses of conventional breeding. For instance, some researchers hope to use it to correct the hip problems that plague some breed of dogs...

The other big question about GM pets is what happens if they get away?...

But our decisions should not be based on romantic notions of what is natural any more than on naive enthusiasm. What we need are policies that identify the risks and deal with them.
 
'Funfish' isn't quite how I'd put it, but there's not much wrong with it. Glowing fish aren't going to live long in the wild, so they'll hardly take over the seas if someone flushes one down the drain.

The general view of genetic engineering is still pretty religious in its nature. Thou shalt not tinker with the work of Nature/God/whoever! After all, invented supernatural forces know best.
 
GM food, GM pets, GM pets being fed GM foods.

How long to will the non-GM people feeding on GM food last?
 
Originally posted by Halcyon
After all, invented supernatural forces know best.

Are you claiming that you too can see before, after, with, and without? :)
 
Back
Top Bottom