Government...

[Hitro]

Democracy, Republic and maybe parliamentarism, though I'd prefer more direct Democracy.

 

[Sir John]

BTW: You cant for example only choose parlamentarism since thats not a governemnt.. Parlamentarism only means that you have a president. you can for example have this: Republic, Dictatorship... That would mean that you have a predient who decides everything.. Or you could have: Republic, Democracy wich would mean a a elected president and so on...

You cant choos only one and say its a government (thats why I have seleceted multiple choises...) For example is communism not a governemnt in itself, communism is more like another word for planned econmy... so you can have a republic and communism together...

 

[Sir John]

BTW: when it comes to socialism its very close to communism, only a "finer" word (Altough most socialist wont admit that..)

 

[WinterRose]

Communism would be most admirable of those if it would really work. But we saw what happened to Soviet Union.
If the whole world would unite, it could work, at least for a while, but soon there would be one or more nations that would be unhappy for whatever reasons.

 

[Pillager]

Parliamentary, monarchy, capitalist.

 

[MrPresident]

You cant for example only choose parlamentarism since thats not a governemnt.. Parlamentarism only means that you have a president.

So Britain the home of Parliamentary democracy is not an example of Parliamentarism? But America which isn't a Parliamentary democracy is an example?

For example is communism not a governemnt in itself, communism is more like another word for planned econmy

Communism isn't another word for planned economy. In Communism there is no government and so no planned economy. You are being confused by the misapplication of Communist theory but the various so-called Communism government of the last century.

Communism would be most admirable of those if it would really work.

You can't have freedom and have communism so I don't have it admirable at all. Equality is useless if we don't have freedom. I would add a quote by Churchill here but I think I have used up my quota for this year.

 

[WinterRose]

Originally posted by MrPresident

You can't have freedom and have communism so I don't have it admirable at all. Equality is useless if we don't have freedom. I would add a quote by Churchill here but I think I have used up my quota for this year.

So it be then. Not going to argue about it, since truth to be known, I don't know much of it. Though that people not having freedom would not bother me at all if I would be in rule.

Republic will be anyway then my choise. It at least, works, most of time.

 

[MrPresident]

Republic will be anyway then my choise. It at least, works, most of time.

I doubt a greater thing can ever be said of a government than that.

 

[Cecasander]

I chose both democracy and communism. So actualy a mixture of both, the best of both. And I prefer green too.

Right-wing ultra-capitalist Republic.

Just like the US? I prefer calling it a facism.

Moderator Action: Civfanatics prefers that you do not make offesive trolls here. Warned, Lefty
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889

 

[Cecasander]

Brrr, all those scary capitalist!

 

[MrPresident]

Just like the US? I prefer calling it a facism.

Yeah, of course, the US is fascist. All those free and fair elections and believe in liberty and freedom as just so fascist. Damn them. They need to be more like Europe and countries like Italy, Germany and Spain.

I chose both democracy and communism.

Not possible. You can't have equality and freedom. And you can't have democracy without freedom.

 

[Chairman Yang]

Communism and dictatorship.

The proletarian dictatorship, the last form of govern before all forms of state are dissolved. However, I might consider an indefinate communist government if worldspread...and me as its leader

 

[MrPresident]

Communism doesn't have a leader.

 

[Simon Darkshade]

Maybe you might want to think about reaching puberty and finishing your homework first, herring.

As for one's own preference, an evil right wing fascist dictatorship as per usual.

 

[Chairman Yang]

Originally posted by MrPresident
Communism doesn't have a leader.

During the revolution it does, and the revolution goes on until all territory has been liberated.


@Simon, I could say the same to you, but I dont stoop that low. I pity you.

(now that should reeeally get the insulting-machine going)

 

[Simon Darkshade]

Darkshade stoops low and pats the quaint little herring on the head.
"Don't worry, my love, you'll eventually grow out of it, like acne. Keep trying, and one day, you too could find real work."

 

[Cecasander]

Originally posted by MrPresident
Yeah, of course, the US is fascist.

I'm glad you agree.

All those free and fair elections

Like the 2000 elections, you mean. With their strange election district system and Jeb Bush messing up foreign votes. And the case that criminals , and many ex-criminals weren't allowed to vote, who would vote for the democrats.

and believe in liberty and freedom as just so fascist.

I don't think the US isn't as free as it used to be. It reminds me of a story, where a guy got 3 years for saying 'burning bush' in a pub. He ment a burning bush and not Bush. And still, in most other countries you can show your disapproval of your head of state

Damn them. They need to be more like Europe and countries like Italy, Germany and Spain.

Well, the huge majorty of the German, Spanish and Italian citizens are against a war, so that wouldn't be bad. Also do all these countries have freedom and something like social security. And enviromental laws. But if you ment the facistic countries, I would like to point out the big American support for dictatorial countries, like Chili, Iraq, South Vietnam, Chang Kai Chek's China and Panama. But I believe we had that point already

Not possible. You can't have equality and freedom.

Ofcouse you can! I can't see why not. And by the way; freedom is not always the very biggest content

And you can't have democracy without freedom. [/B]

As I told...

 

[MrPresident]

With their strange election district system and Jeb Bush messing up foreign votes. And the case that criminals , and many ex-criminals weren't allowed to vote, who would vote for the democrats.

That is there system of election and until 2000 the Democrats weren't complaining about it. Also I don't think America is alone in barring criminals (do you mean people in jail? Because they certainly can't vote) and ex-criminals from voting.

I don't think the US isn't as free as it used to be.

I think it is as free as its ever been.

It reminds me of a story, where a guy got 3 years for saying 'burning bush' in a pub. He ment a burning bush and not Bush. And still, in most other countries you can show your disapproval of your head of state

*cough* anecdotal.

But if you ment the facistic countries, I would like to point out the big American support for dictatorial countries, like Chili, Iraq, South Vietnam, Chang Kai Chek's China and Panama.

And the dictatorships they were supporting were keeping democracy from taking root? The Vietnamese and Chinese opposition certainly weren't democratic.

Ofcouse you can! I can't see why not. And by the way; freedom is not always the very biggest content

How can you have equality without forcing it upon your citizens? And how can you have freedom if you are forcing everyone to be economically equal?

 

[Pillager]

God Almighty. No wonder Americans get hacked off with the outside world.

 

[Knight-Dragon]

Depends on whether I'm the ruler or the ruled...