posted July 12, 2001 12:51 PM by Eyes:
I'm not going to waste my time on HIER because number 1 he only plays deity, number 2 he's lost to many players that are beginners, and number 3 he is a complete moron.
I'll make a few more comments, as a spectator.
Reason #1 does not sound like a good excuse for no game, Eyes... I doubt that if you are good at Emperor that you would suddenly be helpless at Deity. If so, then your playing ability is somewhat akin to a tennis player who will only compete in a single-surface court, like Clay. A clay-court specialist can never rightfully claim to be great, because they are too limited compared to other players who can play a variety of conditions. <IMG SRC="http://forums.civfanatics.com/ubb/lol.gif" border=0>
Your reason #2 is weak, but it is the best of the 3 you offered. However, even if H lost to a beginner(s), there is no reason why he can't lose to you, too. Of course, if H should beat you, then by bringing this point up to the rest of the world, people might question how a mere novice who loses to beginners can beat you. <IMG SRC="http://forums.civfanatics.com/ubb/cry.gif" border=0> But if you win, well there is no way H can claim to be the superior player.
Your reason #3 just reflects badly on you personally for saying it. I guarantee people do not think more of you as a player when you duck, then insult, possible opponents. The perception is that you are avoiding a match in which you really believe you may not win.
So I'd say skip the insults (they only serve to insult their author <IMG SRC="http://forums.civfanatics.com/ubb/cwm33.gif" border=0> ), play H <IMG SRC="http://forums.civfanatics.com/ubb/tank.gif" border=0>, and move on! <IMG SRC="http://forums.civfanatics.com/ubb/beerchug.gif" border=0>
EDIT: Spelling.
[This message has been edited by starlifter (edited July 12, 2001).]