

Please don't bump threads over a couple months old, unless you have a constructive comment to give (i.e. an update). Bumping just to say "neat o!" Will get many veteran forum goers annoyed.
Welcome to CFC by the way!![]()
@Bebro: Seeing as somebody just bumped this... Excellent unit, Bebro, thanks.

Too much work at university (I know about that, I'm a Historian too).![]()

Duuuhh... the Normans?![]()
Granted, although I still think I'll wait for his answer, as - even if the "obvious" is correct - it could be timeline/event based, "great persons" based, Marxist historiography based (which has nothing to do with Marxism as a political sentiment
). Then there's the question of how deep he (hypothetically) goes into the Normans in Normandy; the Conquest; post-Conquest resistance; or the transformation of "English" society post-conquest (whose echoes linger today in the English language: think of "pig" and "pork", and "cow" and "beef" - sounds silly, no? Except that "pig" and "cow" are Anglo-Saxon and "pork" and "beef" are Norman French: the messy things you had to tend to before slaughtering reflect the underdog status of the conquered, whereas the end-use food reflects the language of the rulers).
- Ares?Anyway, enough speculation- Ares?
European Middle Ages, post-1920s. Rather military / politics than demographics.
Middle Ages AND post-1920s.