Okay, so I'm pretty bad at this game. I played Civ2 years ago and never won a single game, but it was always fun. For Civ4, I've won a few Noble games, cultural and time victory, but never won a Prince game before. I suck at warmongering and city placement, and suck even more at specializing, so I'm asking you guys for input.
I was inspired by Sisiutil's All Leaders Challenge. I've read through the first thread, and bits of the second, and although I do believe I learned from them. After reading his Monty thread, and learning what chopping is, Noble stopped being a very big challenge. I still find Prince too difficult for me though. I am doing better at warmongering early, but I think I still have too many builder tendancies and don't know which cities to raze and which to keep.
I am picking Kublai because he is Agg/Cre and I think that's a nice, albeit mismatched combination. I just want creative because I sometimes miss Stonehenge and it takes forever to get obelisks built in every new city. Aggressive because I want to learn how to warmonger, and the free promotion seems like it'll help with that.
Part 1: 4000 B.C.
The settings:
and
The start location:
What do you all think about where I should settle?
All I can tell right now is that I'm above the equator based on the resource icon pointer (something I learned from the ALC thread). That probably puts me near the top of my continent. I want to do an early war, so after maybe my 2nd or 3rd city, I'll attack someone if I have the metals. If I don't get Copper or Iron, it'll probably be a doomed game unless you guys are majorly helpful, because whenever I go the route of the builder, I do worse than when I try to warmonger.
The stone means I should be able to get Stonehenge or the Pyramids or both. What tech should I go first? Masonry? Mining then Bronze Working? Am I correct to think the little river between where my Settler is standing, and where the Stone is, means if I settle in place and build a Quarry I won't need to connect them with road to get the stone working? I really hope there are more resources beyond those forests surrounding me.
For production, should I start with something like a Barracks so my population can grow to 2 before I get a Worker? Or should I go right for a worker since I could potentionally get Masonry and the Stone hooked up early, allowing me to go for Pyramids super early? I find that when I get too many wonders and religions early on and ignore military, and my score gets to the top, most of the AIs will declare war and cripple or destroy me. Is going for wonders at population 1 what gets me into that mess?
The starting spot doesn't look very juicy. Not a lot of hills, no flood plains, and no other visible resources. At least it is on a coast, but the coastal tiles show no resources so that is actually a bummer. Is this a bad starting spot? I would assume that coast is worse than plains or grasslands because you can't improve coast unless there is a resource (which I don't have).
I would appreciate any input you have to give me. Thank you in advance.
I was inspired by Sisiutil's All Leaders Challenge. I've read through the first thread, and bits of the second, and although I do believe I learned from them. After reading his Monty thread, and learning what chopping is, Noble stopped being a very big challenge. I still find Prince too difficult for me though. I am doing better at warmongering early, but I think I still have too many builder tendancies and don't know which cities to raze and which to keep.
I am picking Kublai because he is Agg/Cre and I think that's a nice, albeit mismatched combination. I just want creative because I sometimes miss Stonehenge and it takes forever to get obelisks built in every new city. Aggressive because I want to learn how to warmonger, and the free promotion seems like it'll help with that.
Part 1: 4000 B.C.
The settings:
and
The start location:
What do you all think about where I should settle?
All I can tell right now is that I'm above the equator based on the resource icon pointer (something I learned from the ALC thread). That probably puts me near the top of my continent. I want to do an early war, so after maybe my 2nd or 3rd city, I'll attack someone if I have the metals. If I don't get Copper or Iron, it'll probably be a doomed game unless you guys are majorly helpful, because whenever I go the route of the builder, I do worse than when I try to warmonger.
The stone means I should be able to get Stonehenge or the Pyramids or both. What tech should I go first? Masonry? Mining then Bronze Working? Am I correct to think the little river between where my Settler is standing, and where the Stone is, means if I settle in place and build a Quarry I won't need to connect them with road to get the stone working? I really hope there are more resources beyond those forests surrounding me.
For production, should I start with something like a Barracks so my population can grow to 2 before I get a Worker? Or should I go right for a worker since I could potentionally get Masonry and the Stone hooked up early, allowing me to go for Pyramids super early? I find that when I get too many wonders and religions early on and ignore military, and my score gets to the top, most of the AIs will declare war and cripple or destroy me. Is going for wonders at population 1 what gets me into that mess?
The starting spot doesn't look very juicy. Not a lot of hills, no flood plains, and no other visible resources. At least it is on a coast, but the coastal tiles show no resources so that is actually a bummer. Is this a bad starting spot? I would assume that coast is worse than plains or grasslands because you can't improve coast unless there is a resource (which I don't have).
I would appreciate any input you have to give me. Thank you in advance.