How often do you win your games?

How often do you win and how often do you feel you take risks?

  • I win 25% of the time. I usually take big risks.

    Votes: 4 4.1%
  • I win 25% of the time. I usually don't take big risks.

    Votes: 14 14.4%
  • I win 50% of the time. I usually take big risks.

    Votes: 5 5.2%
  • I win 50% of the time. I usually don't take big risks.

    Votes: 3 3.1%
  • I win 75% of the time. I usually take big risks.

    Votes: 8 8.2%
  • I win 75% of the time. I usually don't take big risks.

    Votes: 26 26.8%
  • I win 90-100% of the time. I usually take "big risks".

    Votes: 5 5.2%
  • I win 90-100% of the time. I usually don't take big risks.

    Votes: 18 18.6%
  • What is this guy talking about? I vote Chuck Norris

    Votes: 14 14.4%

  • Total voters
    97
Incidentally, if I frequently feel 'it's a long shot, but my only chance to stay competitive at all'... does this count as 'risky' or 'non-risky' play?
It meets the OP's definition of risk taking, but I'm trying to maximise my chances in the long run.

If I tried to play it safe (defined narrowly), I would lose a lot more games.
 
I win 90% of the time on Noble and 85% on Prince, regardless of whether I take risks.

Monarch though, if I don't take risks I lose more than I win, but if I do take risks I win more than I lose. Unfortunately for me, I don't take enough risks.
 
I play on Emporer or Immortal usually, and win probably around 25% of my games. The win percentage is low I guess, but I play on settings I find very challenging so the wins I do get feel way better than just steamrolling through Monarch AI's doing whatever I please. I always take risks when I play, the higher the level the more it seems necessary to take big risks just to stay even with the AI, let alone outpace them. If I don't take risks it just ends up being a turtling game where the lead AI just pulls away faster and faster as time goes on.
 
I usually have to avoid risks on Monarch to win. Based on difficulty level I would say I win around 90% on Noble. Around 60-75% on Prince and probably just over 25% on Monarch.

Ironon said:
Incidentally, if I frequently feel 'it's a long shot, but my only chance to stay competitive at all'... does this count as 'risky' or 'non-risky' play?
It meets the OP's definition of risk taking, but I'm trying to maximise my chances in the long run.
Yeah this poll's accuracy in many areas is really broad. In questions like these it depends to the person if they see the glass half empty/full. I see that as a risk personally, because if it fails/succeeds it could have an impact on your winning/losing status. But someone else might see it simply as a game mechanic. This is probably why I chose to avoid difficulty level.

BARBEERIAN said:
I always take risks when I play, the higher the level the more it seems necessary to take big risks just to stay even with the AI, let alone outpace them. If I don't take risks it just ends up being a turtling game where the lead AI just pulls away faster and faster as time goes on.

I assume you see it as a gameplay mechanic. I agree some risks are necessary for every game. Even if you play on cheiftain and win only 25% of your games you may feel risks are necessary. (Although I am aware this is not to the same degree.)

I would also assume CCRunner7(feel free to correct me) 1 page back would see risks as necessary so he may have even voted that he doesn't take risks. Although he may have as well. I would say he stays in his 'safezone' as well but he may think otherwise. I don't know.
The fact is that chance is a part of any strategy. The chance that something may go wrong. I meant for this poll to be more about how much you put at risk. Do you minimize risk in your game? Or do you use it as a tool?

I attack with 25% odds alot. I win a decent amount with it too. I don't know my win/loss ratio with it, but I am confident enough to do it more than I would advise someone else to. Of course, their are conditions that must be met first but I would assume mine are lower than some people's here. Maybe not. But unit odds aren't really "risks" IMO as I describe in the poll. To me, to qualify a unit situation you would have to be willing to slam a whole stack into a city with only a ~50% chance to take the city (% chance of the whole stack dying/take the city) With surrounding units coming in for reinforcement on the attack to up you odds of taking the city to 65-70% chance to take the city overall. But at the potential cost of an entire stack. That is to me is a risk in military. But in this scenario you assume in 5 turns the city in question gets a strong bonus. (Say walls or some awesome new unit they can build.)

Kiwi Tyrant said:
Plan A is a risky move to get a momentary jump on the crowd. Hopefully this risk snowballs into a maintainable lead or position of power. This risky plan could be anything from trying to complete the Mid's (while not being Ind, with 18 other civ's), bee-lining a certain tech path, or attacking a neighbour.

If this risk fails, or will inevitably fail, then fall back on Plan B. This plan merely consists of what you would be normally doing to stay in the game if you did'nt take any asforementioned risks. This is the safe, keep ya head low, wait for developments, steady as she goes plan.

....and then if you grow impatient with things grinding along until the advent of modern warfare to sort everyone out, then a Plan C could be pulled out of the hat! lol
OK I think our thread is sounding weird enough now so I am gonna say a bunch of stuff now. :D :bounce:

I assume you play close to my playstyle but probably on a faster speed. I think Plan A for everyone has good odds. (Military Rush, Ancient Wonder(s), Tech Rush) So A means 2 possible B's (succeed/fail). But Plan C for me usually comes in the medieval age and usually in the form of a huge military rush. The rush usually succeeds so well I can actually do a whole other plan in the middle of it.This can hurt if both get halted though. Then Plan D comes in the Ren/Ind eras. (Plan D has alot of options.) I like to try and race into the modern era but that is hard to do in general. Usually Plan D's results show up in the industrial age. Then Plan E begins. The problem is for me, Plan E soon becomes Plan E,F,G,... X, Y, and Z very quickly. Sometimes Plan D will do this too.
 
Plan C:a will bridge the gap before Plan D takes effect.

....implement Plan D:a shortly after to multiply the results of Plan E.

If these fail, switch to Plan 1.
 
oops, wrong button! (takes another swig) :goodjob:
 
Ummm i hardly ever finish games im not winning so I cant be sure... It should be around the 75% though (monarch)..

I do take big risks and i only reload if I misclick or the randomness truely screws me over, like attacking a city 6 times in a row with 80% or better odds and losing them all shich causes me to lose a war. Ofcourse i would also reload if i would ever win 6 battles in a row at 20%, but well the 80% scenario comes up alot more often, i must be unlucky.
 
I do take big risks and i only reload if I misclick or the randomness truely screws me over, like attacking a city 6 times in a row with 80% or better odds and losing them all shich causes me to lose a war. Ofcourse i would also reload if i would ever win 6 battles in a row at 20%, but well the 80% scenario comes up alot more often, i must be unlucky.

You're not unlucky; you just fight much more times 6 battles in a row at 80% than the opposite
 
Interesting thread, i think 25% my started games will get in to industrial age (i get bored.), and those games, (if I dont get bored for easy victory) I win.
 
6 games on Vanilla
3 games on Warload
7 games on BTS

I usually take the safe way with no big risk. But sometime my gramble ways override my commun sense or if I am rushing I will take the fastest way.
 
I also go for the no risk no pain method. I prefer a peaceful victory and rarely go to war

I used to play like that alot. But recently I have seen my warmanger come out. Warmongering on larger maps can be devastating and potentially self-defeating. It might be too much warmongering is hampering me also.
 
I use the HoF to keep track of my games, so i cant reload if things go wrong, just have to get on with it.

Win most gamesat lower than noble but trying to crank up towards Prince soon so that should be a bit more hit and miss
 
I'm a HOF player too, I can win much more than 50% on monarch, always win on prince these days, won a couple on Emperor. Now I've finished my marathon G Major 36 I will probably try and get another emperor win.
 
Back
Top Bottom