CivLuvah
Deity
Just wanting to admire the culture card art again.
Dutch = Rembrandt
Aztec = Codex
Khmer guy = still a mood
Dutch = Rembrandt
Aztec = Codex
Khmer guy = still a mood
D is pretty far down the list, do we can another skipped one like the Aztecs hiding in there?
I also imagine that India will appear in the Modern Era.So yeah, happy with that reveal, even if I want to point out that naming something East Indian in a world without India is a bit strange. This is also true for any other name though as well. And Humankind will have a India, as Harappa and/or Maurya are likely to appear. It might not make sense, or the East India Company will trade in fur hats or silver, but that's cool as well. In the worst case, I just imagine the company is a joint venture of the East and India families.
Starting with a "D" seems to suggest no Ashanti Empire, which is a shame. Inca next week?
It's the preferred term in history these days as it emphasizes the continuity of history rather than the break that Enlightenment historians liked to flatter themselves happened after the Medieval period (a break that doesn't have a lot of historical support: virtually everything said Enlightenment historians believed was unique about the Renaissance had its roots in the Middle Ages).I still think "early modem" sounds incredibly clunky, but oh well.
Besides the "Renaissance" being basically a made up concept, or at least wildly exaggerated, it's typically considered to start in the fourteenth century, still decidedly medieval times, and it's an Eurocentric—arguably Italocentric—term.It's the preferred term in history these days as it emphasizes the continuity of history rather than the break that Enlightenment historians liked to flatter themselves happened after the Medieval period (a break that doesn't have a lot of historical support: virtually everything said Enlightenment historians believed was unique about the Renaissance had its roots in the Middle Ages).
Not to mention that the Italian Renaissance was arguably less important even for Europe as a whole than the Renaissance of the Twelfth Century or the Carolingian Renaissance a couple centuries before that.Besides the "Renaissance" being basically a made up concept, or at least wildly exaggerated, it's typically considered to start in the fourteenth century, still decidedly medieval times, and it's an Eurocentric—arguably Italocentric—term.
Dutch East India Company (Vereenigda Oostindische Compagnie - which is where the V.O.C. in the Emblematic Quarter comes from) Warehouse or 'Factory' as it was termed at the time, is the first Quarter that I think we've seen that may also be Unique: historically, they were built Outside of the Netherlands more than inside. So, is this an Emblematic Quarter that can be built outside Dutch territory?
IF so, I smell detailed Trade Agreements in the Diplomatic game to make the Dutch Faction work . . .
Speaking as a layman, polders or other "aquatic Quarters" that create land are probably more difficult to implement properly from a technical point as well, as they have to modify the terrain instead of just adding buildings and textures on it. So I'd rather we have the time to do it properly and perhaps use it for multiple quarters than rush it for just one Emblematic.Seriousoy though, I like that they keep "infrastructure on water" out for the moment. They can add it later together with the Chinampa and other stuff. Seems to make sense in a DLC as a distinct category.
And there's that (in)famous song about renaming cities stuck in my head again...New Amsterdam (later New York)
That's nobody's business but the Turks'.And there's that (in)famous song about renaming cities stuck in my head again...
Civilization III had this interesting city name, for if you were the Ottomans and ran out of city names:And there's that (in)famous song about renaming cities stuck in my head again...
Civilization III had this interesting city name, for if you were the Ottomans and ran out of city names:
At least the citizen names don't turn Spanish in the Modern Era, like the Aztecs.This is the sort of thing that caused me to start keeping files of city names for Civs that tend to be light on the numbers, or simply have city lists that are execrable.
Like Mayan lists that include modern Spanish site names (yes, I'm looking at YOU: Six-Sky!)
I have made a new city list for almost every civilisation in the game, because I was making one for my own game anyway. I like to pick the native names - 'Roma' instead of 'Rome', for an obvious example - and, as you say, some of the Mesoamerican (and Iroquois - please name them Haudenosaunnee, Amplitude) city names are just horrible. I think I based my lists on Civilization IV, then researched every single place in there, and added cities from III, V, and VI, after researching each of them, if they were not on my list yet. It took quite a lot of time, and for most civilisations (the most obvious examples being ancient Mesopotamia and native Americans) I also did my own research to add entirely new cities not present in any of the games.This is the sort of thing that caused me to start keeping files of city names for Civs that tend to be light on the numbers, or simply have city lists that are execrable.
Like Mayan lists that include modern Spanish site names (yes, I'm looking at YOU: Six-Sky!)