FinalDoomsday
Prince
Nice to see Franks new artwork, No word on English though.
But I don't understand why just not go with Iranians, which is a right word, and totally fit with Qajar period.
maybe yes. I don't really expect it. Another possibility, it's easier now to add later : Achaemenid Persians > Safavid Persians > Persians. I suppose it work well too.
the raptor hand and floating book of the byzantine lady![]()
Someone out there is going to cook up a conspiracy theory that the Byzantine elite were the first to be replaced by the reptilians.![]()
Indo Aryans (nomadic militarist) ->
Achaemenid Persians (expansionist) ->
Samanid Persians (scientific) ->
Safavid Persians (aestethe) ->
Persians (builder)
20th century Iran I'd gladly skip, although fun fact, the current speed of scientific development in Iran is so awesome that IIRC it 15th country in the world by the amount of scientific publications:
Spoiler :
So maybe Humankind 4 will give them Scientist affinity by then![]()
Being an Indian,I will love Indo-Aryan Culture but I think here what u mean is earlier Indo-Iranian Culture from which Iranian & Indo-Aryan Branched off..
I just wanted to ask, how viable does the idea of ancient Indo - Aryan culture seems to you? Nobody has ever suggest yu oped something like that in games like this (well, not that surprising in the case of civ, as there is no leader possible at all - beyond Zoroaster?). And it seems very cool to me, much cooler than Elam as an ancient link of Iranian civilization. It would also, in fact, be a shared link with Indian cultures.
I think we have better chance to get later Iranian culture than Indo-Iranian as we know more about them thru Avesta & other sources.
Zoroaster wasn't Indo-Aryan. He wasn't even Proto-Iranian. While the exact nature of the people who spoke Avestan isn't clear, we can say with reasonable certainty he lived in Afghanistan and spoke an Eastern Iranian language (that it's pretty much universally agreed is not ancestral to Pashto, older linguistic literature and Pashtun nationalist narratives notwithstanding).(well, not that surprising in the case of civ, as there is no leader possible at all - beyond Zoroaster?)
A thousand times this. TBH I think they'd do fine in Civ, but if I can't have them in Civ I'd at least love to have them in Humankind.This does make me wish we can have Sogdians in the future - they were Iranians as well, and they were a crucial part of the Silk Road.
A thousand times this. TBH I think they'd do fine in Civ, but if I can't have them in Civ I'd at least love to have them in Humankind.
I think Oxyartes would be fine for a leader (no need to split hairs about whether he was Bactrian or Sogdian), but I don't disagree that they fit the Humankind model well.I personally find them more a fit in Humankind after had an clearer idea about the concept of "Culture" in Humankind: Sogdians didn't have long city list for 30 cities, didn't have a common leader, reached their zenith in one Era, and could doing fine even as a vassal.
The Sogdians were constantly someone else's vassal (Hephthalites', Göktürks', Tang's, Abbasid's), but most of their fames were gathered in this vassalage period - one can play as a vassal and win in Humankind, but cannot do that in Civ (currently).
Anybody track an "all elephant" progression, yet? Do we have an elephant unit culture in each era? And if so, who gets elephants for the modern era ...