@Gunboat Diplomat
I agree with @sampsa, the worker steal is a bit risky as it could shift the AI towards more unit buildup. Of course here Gandhi is an extreme outlier on the peaceful side.
Even then, I would still go 2nd worker over barracks. Most of your immortals will fight exactly 1 fight, and Combat I is not necessarily better than, say, having one more immortal in your stack. On the long term the barracks has no value in isolation whereas the worker keeps producing. Bombay and the city you will build on the other side of those floodplains will need a lot of worker turns to cottage.
I agree with @sampsa, the worker steal is a bit risky as it could shift the AI towards more unit buildup. Of course here Gandhi is an extreme outlier on the peaceful side.
Even then, I would still go 2nd worker over barracks. Most of your immortals will fight exactly 1 fight, and Combat I is not necessarily better than, say, having one more immortal in your stack. On the long term the barracks has no value in isolation whereas the worker keeps producing. Bombay and the city you will build on the other side of those floodplains will need a lot of worker turns to cottage.
per turn so you better chop them asap. It doesn't matter if you grow into unhappiness, it's just -2
. It's much much better to grow into unhappiness to whip later than forgo always working the best tiles.
from deer is irrelevant for a long time. Those worker turns could've been used better!
is something. Then again, what's the rush, Mids is +3 already and monument is +1. My next was your "3" which has 1st ring seafood and strong
to every city you have). Delhi's huge
total I think (compared to silver, E of Bombay, S of Delhi).
is from Delhi which will launch a golden age ~T105 if the MoM is done by then. Two workers getting shipped to the marble and I might ship two more as it's kinda urgent. Have both calendar
-potential is huge.
, but of course it's powered by the golden age. Cap is size 13 getting out the