• We are currently performing site maintenance, parts of civfanatics are currently offline, but will come back online in the coming days. For more updates please see here.

Is Mubarak the Mabus of Nostradamus?

Yes. But instead of Ajidica, he wrote Apavolous. And instead of taking the words from your mouth, I gave you a sword made out of jade. And instead of that happening here and now, it happened 20 years ago in Zanzibar.

But yes, he predicted it.

:lol: I love it.


Oh, and straight from Ray Mabus' wiki page:

wiki said:
Despite Nostradamus Quatraines fortelling of what most forsee as the third Antichrist named Mabus, President Obama appointed Ray Mabus as Secretary of the Navy. "Century 2, Quatrain 62 Mabus will soon die, then will come, A horrible undoing of people and animals, At once one will see vengeance, One hundred powers, thirst, famine, when the comet will pass."

Good to see Kruelgor is on the case.
 
:lol: I love it.


Oh, and straight from Ray Mabus' wiki page:

[QUOTE-wiki]Despite Nostradamus Quatraines fortelling of what most forsee as the third Antichrist named Mabus, President Obama appointed Ray Mabus as Secretary of the Navy. "Century 2, Quatrain 62 Mabus will soon die, then will come, A horrible undoing of people and animals, At once one will see vengeance, One hundred powers, thirst, famine, when the comet will pass."

Nostradamus never says that Mabus is an antichrist. What he says is there will be war from "a hundred lands" after Mabus dies. Some have interpreted this to mean the "antichrist" will make his appearance well known after Mabus dies.
 
i-like-where-this-thread-is-going.jpg
 
Nostradamus never says that Mabus is an antichrist. What he says is there will be war from "a hundred lands" after Mabus dies. Some have interpreted this to mean the "antichrist" will make his appearance well known after Mabus dies. Perhaps Obama is the man.

Umm no sorry :rolleyes: Pretty sure THE BIBLE says the antichrist will be someone noone expects. Otherwise it would be easy to fight him and noone would want to join him because they would know right away it is the antichrist?
 
I would say that any leader where almost his entire population is specifically against him, and when that leader has been in control of the nation for 20+ years like Mubarak then 'yes', he is a very stupid leader.

The Pilgrimage of Grace boasted a size of about 35,000 people. Does that make Henry VIII 35,000/2,250,000 of a stupid person?
 
Mark my words: If the revolution is successful and the Muslim Brotherhood gets into power, there will be war with Israel. It wouldn't be a matter of "if" but "when".

Like I said before, this is assuming, of course, the Muslim Brotherhood goes back on their pledge of non-violence they've upheld for almost 100 years.
 
Nah everybody knows that Oprah is Beelzebub, she can't be anti-Christ. She's not important enough.

@Leonel he could also be referring to the likely event of Israel delcaring an unprovoked, immoral and illegal war against Egypt. A regime whose doctrine includes Lebensraum im Osten are well capable of declaring war just because they don't like the face of the government of their neighbours.
 
The Pilgrimage of Grace boasted a size of about 35,000 people. Does that make Henry VIII 35,000/2,250,000 of a stupid person?

I stand by what I originally said. Any leader where almost his entire population is specifically against him, and when that leader has been in control of the nation for 20+ years like Mubarak then 'yes', he is a very stupid leader.

I have no clue what you are talking about.
 
I have no clue what you are talking about.

Shouldn't you be taking that as an indication that you really need to go away for a few years and study your history?
 
Shouldn't you be taking that as an indication that you really need to go away for a few years and study your history?

Not at all. I answered your question. It applies to whoever you want to bring up. Again, I shall repeat, any leader where almost his entire population is specifically against him and has been in control of his country for 20+ years such as Mubarak is a very stupid leader.
 
Not at all. I answered your question. It applies to whoever you want to bring up. Again, I shall repeat, any leader where almost his entire population is specifically against him and has been in control of his country for 20+ years such as Mubarak is a very stupid leader.
Any leader who can maintain control of a country for 20+ years despite the whole country being firmly against him is a very smart leader.
 
Who cares about how good or bad a leader he's been? Hosni Mubarak has done a damned good job by Hosni Mubarak. Isn't that all he really cares about anyway?
 
Back
Top Bottom