Is there enough interest for another PYL?

[Quotey]

Hm, Issy? She's easy to get on with. How about Suryavarman? I am pretty sure he'll declare whenever he feels like it (as well as making a lot of demands), though I don't know what XML file to look in.

e: found it. Sury only has 10% chance. But Missy Issy can't declare at Pleased.

 

[Gocho]

Sounds fun, it will be a great game for me as I normally don't build to much of an early army and just play diplomat, I figure that would be a poor plan this time around!

 

[Bleys]

Hm, Issy? She's easy to get on with. How about Suryavarman? I am pretty sure he'll declare whenever he feels like it (as well as making a lot of demands), though I don't know what XML file to look in.

e: found it. Sury only has 10% chance. But Missy Issy can't declare at Pleased.

Hmm, ok, then. Maybe I will just stick with Mao, and create 2 China's, a China-Mao and a China-Qin, so than when another AI demands you stop trading with China, you will know which one, LOL. That was a problem in the Catfight game, Boudi kept telling me my relations with England would no longer be tolerate, and she had both English queens on her borders, heh.

 

[BalbanesBeoulve]

Isabella and Ugly Khmer guy both have a 10% chance to dow at pleased, but Survayarman's aggression is high, while Izzy's is medium, so out of the 2 Survayarman is more likely to backstab. But there's about 10 other civs that have aggression at high and 10% chance to backstab at pleased. Pretty standard warmonger behavior.

Looking forward to the new game. I've already chosen the civ i'm going to play.

 

[patagonia]

Is Ragnar not the warmonger/backstabber par-excellence?

He missed out on the FIN game, so it may be worth sticking him in here.

 

[Bleys]

Sorry for the delay guys, but something came up and I doubt I will finish by tomorrow.

I agree with Patagonia, Ragnar gets the nod over Mao, to avoid the double China.

Again, hopefully tomorrow night, maybe not though, depends on my day.