Is this real history?

ShadowWarrior

Prince
Joined
Jun 7, 2001
Messages
411
As the title says. Are the facts in the "analysis" below real history?

Analysis of the Tungning’s strategy against Qing expedition

Excerpt from "A Study in Tungning Statecraft," by Dr. Edward Somerset, Professor of History, Oxford University, 1880.

Chapter VII: Ending the Qing Expedition in Seven Phases

At the close of the 17th century, the Qing Dynasty’s rule over the vast expense of continental Asia was beginning to consolidate under the diligent and competent leadership of the energetic Emperor Kangxi, but Taiwan, where the last stronghold of the Ming remanent still stood, remained untamed. The Qing expedition, led by the experienced naval commander Admiral Shi Lang, represented Kangxi’s attempt to eliminate the threat in Taiwan.

This episode stands as one of the most illuminating historical examples of advanced statecraft, blending psychological manipulation, military deception, and strategic patience into a cohesive and brilliant strategy. In seven phases, the rulers of Tungning (Taiwan) neutralized Kangxi’s invasion that Admiral Shi Lang spearheaded. The following detailed analysis unpacks each phase clearly, ensuring readers understand the meticulous calculations involved.

First Phase: Misinformation at Penghu
Tungning rulers deliberately propagated false intelligence through local villagers in Penghu, spreading rumors that Taiwanese naval forces were engaged in trade in Southeast Asia, thereby unavailable for Taiwan's defense. This initial deception critically undermined Shi Lang's assessment of Tungning’s naval capability, leading him to underestimate the true defensive strength awaiting him.

Second Phase: Initial Offer of Defection
As Shi Lang advanced from Penghu toward Taiwan, Tungning rulers made a seemingly desperate overture, offering him profit-sharing from their prosperous mercantile fleet if he defected. This offer was strategically crafted to create an impression of vulnerability and unreadiness, significantly bolstering Shi Lang’s confidence and dulling his strategic caution.

Third Phase: The Calculated Renewal of the Offer
Upon Shi Lang's landing at Tainan, Tungning rulers once again renewed their offer, this time dramatically increasing the profit share to nearly eighty percent. The carefully worded letter intentionally projected an acute sense of desperation and helplessness, effectively pushing Shi Lang into a state of complacency and overconfidence, convinced of an inevitable Qing victory.

Fourth Phase: The Enclave Trap
Tungning rulers then executed another sophisticated deception by disseminating false intelligence claiming they intended to flee northward with their gold to Manila. Compelled by urgency and ambition, Shi Lang rushed off his ships to intercept the Tungning rulers on land with half of the soldiers he brought from China. The other half stayed on the Qing ships. Crucially, Tungning strategists had calculated this exact scenario, intentionally forcing Shi Lang off his ships and onto unfamiliar land terrain, fully aware that Shi Lang, while unmatched at sea, lacked experience and competence in land warfare. Indigenous warriors highly skilled in local combat, alongside hidden cannons and repeating crossbows, delivered a devastating defeat to Shi Lang’s land-bound forces within the meticulously selected enclave near Tainan, where all the advantage conferred by the terrain formation was on Tungning's side.

Fifth Phase: Ensuring Strategic Silence
Following Shi Lang’s defeat, Tungning rulers faced the critical necessity of preventing Emperor Kangxi from learning of the disastrous outcome prematurely. Immediate knowledge of Shi Lang's defeat would likely prompt Kangxi to swiftly dispatch a larger and more prepared second expedition, posing a grave threat to Tungning’s survival before they could adequately fortify their defenses. Consequently, absolute strategic silence was imperative, and this meant preventing any Qing soldiers still remaining on their ships from returning to China with news of defeat. To achieve this goal, Tungning forces disguised themselves as victorious Qing soldiers and cunningly enticed the Qing soldiers on their ships ashore by promising vast amounts of reward in gold stored at the enclave where Shi Lang met his end. Blinded by greed, these soldiers disembarked eagerly and hurried off to the enclave only to find themselves confronted by Tungning's formidable warriors and weaponry. But rather than facing annihilation, these Qing soldiers were offered peaceful integration into Tungning society as settlers, with assurances that their families from China would join them later. Accepting these terms, the Qing soldiers laid down their arms, ensuring no immediate reports of the defeat reached Beijing, thus securing Tungning's strategic silence. As a bonus, Tungning acquired labor, which was in short supply.

Sixth Phase: Tactical Naval Brilliance
With diminished numbers and deprived of Shi Lang's naval expertise, the remaining Qing naval forces were ill-equipped to counter Tungning’s innovative maritime tactics. Tungning specifically deployed agile, rocket artillery-equipped small craft, designed expressly to immobilize the Qing warships by burning their masts and sails. These crafts continually repositioned to stay in Qing vessels' blind spots at fore and aft positions, immunizing themselves from Qing cannons. This tactical brilliance crippled the Qing fleet, enabling Tungning’s heavier vessels to capture enemy ships, bolstering their naval and mercantile capabilities.

Seventh Phase: Leveraging Prolonged Uncertainty
This carefully orchestrated silence produced a prolonged uncertainty that paralyzed Beijing’s strategic response for two full years. During this crucial interval, Emperor Kangxi was left in anxious ignorance, unwilling and unable to commit further resources without reliable information. Tungning exploited this silence masterfully, fortifying defenses, consolidating internal strength, and expanding diplomatic influence without interference.

Collectively, these meticulously orchestrated phases reflect Tungning's exceptional statecraft—a harmonious blend of psychological mastery, strategic deception, and disciplined patience. The Qing expedition's failure vividly demonstrates that numerical and military superiority alone cannot secure victory without equally superior strategic insight and political foresight.
 
Last edited:
Google can't confirm the existence of a professor by that name or a book by that name. And the Wiki account of the expedition gives the exact opposite results.

It was a big deal, just 11 years before you're asking, that Oxford appointed one single professor in Chinese history

The first Professor of Chinese was Rev. James Legge, appointed in 1869. “In or about the year 1875 the University accepted a proposal on the part of persons interested in promoting the study of Chinese to contribute to a sum which ultimately amounted to £3003, as the endowment of a Professorship of Chinese” (Oxford Historical Register, p.79).

Very short, for a chapter in an academic book.

All sorts of caution flags with this one.

Where did you come across this and what makes you ask about it?

Almost seems it may be an exercise in disinformation. Or GenAI hallucination.
 
Last edited:
It also doesn't read like 19th century scholarly English, let alone British ("labor" ;) ). More like a Power Point presentation draft, actually.
Although I'm far from a linguistics expert, the lexicon used ("intelligence", "phychological") feels more 21th than 19th century as well.
 
Good call. "Unpacks" is also a very recent idiom.
 
Adding to this, I would think that a European of the time would have referred to the island as Formosa rather than Taiwan.

Furthermore, the article uses the Hanyu pinyin spelling of Qing, with a Q instead of a Ch. Hanyu pinyin was developed as a romanization for Chinese in the 1950’s.

Unless someone transcribed this and altered the text to fit the current spellings and things, I’m thinking this is a forgery (?), without knowing any further history.
 
Eh. Maybe.

But if so, I can only imagine it as an exercise in evaluating the likely validity of a particular account (too lengthy to be a simple True/False). So if ShadowWarrior sees how critical minds go about assessing that validity, they have learned the lesson the teacher wanted to impart.
 
Back
Top Bottom