KingAshDawg
Chieftain
Flakpanzer said:First of all, thanks for starting a thread that isn't about anticipation, disappointment, or frustration with regards to the release, but is about a genuine discussion about the game. (not that I am innocent of going psycho until I get my hands on it).
Anyway, I actually have sometimes been a little miffed at the humor. I just ignored it and didn't pay attention. I like that the game seems lighthearted, but as a history buff, I think it's a fine line between being a silly and irritating cartoonish game and something more serious and attempting to be realistic. After all, isn't that what civ is about, reliving history. There is nothing wrong with it being a little light hearted, but what you have quoted does seem to go over the top into goofiness that may distract from the gameplay.
OK, first time poster and medium-time lurker. As a history buff myself, I don't think the Civ franchise is going for historical accuracy. Anytime the Romans are chasing the Carthaginians into outer space or the Zulus basically do anything more advanced than the iron age we can tell that this game isn't a history lesson. It IS an awesome turn-based game with a historical backdrop and so they can take liberties with their historical accuracies. I see what you're saying, but I think if you're looking to play this game and expect historical accuracies you will be greatly dissapointed as that is not how it is intended to be played.
And yes, more cowbell would be awesome.