The Kingmaker
Alexander
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2004
- Messages
- 1,971
It comes as something of a shock that up to this point, the Italians have never been represented in-game as a cohesive civ, considering how many of the great artists, writers, merchants and musicians included in the game hail from Italy.
I know ancient Rome is located in the same region, but it does not adequately represent the renaissance Italian civ. By contrast, Greece has previously been represented with both an ancient Hellenic and a medieval Byzantine civ. (And now we're even getting a Macedonian iteration). Why not include a medieval Italian civ? The ancient Greeks were largely a collection of disjointed, rival city states, yet they are portrayed as a united civ. The Italian city-state situation was much the same, yet they are not present.
And then there's Venice. Yes, the portrayal of the Venetian civ in Civ5 will always be controversial. Some players liked playing as a virtual city-state... with only one city to call their own. Other players found this play-style to be too eclectic for their tastes. Now there's been talk of including Genoa as its own civ. If Venice was already controversial, methinks Genoa may be a further step in the wrong direction.
My proposal is simple. Let's be informed by the innovative portrayal of the Greeks in Civ6, with two different leaders reflecting the very different agendas of Athens and Sparta. Why not do the same with Italy? Pick two of the most prominent leaders from different renaissance city-states and craft different play-styles for the Italians while sharing a base civ.
We could even keep Enrico Dandolo and Venice for one of the two if you wish.
The other leader could be Cosimo or Lorenzo de Medici of Florence, who would be patrons of arts where the Venetians focused on more lucrative pursuits.
Or we could even be a little bit daring and feature a Borgia in game. We're focusing on "big" personalities in this game, after all.
Both leaders could share the Condottieri as a UU and the Piazza as a unique district.
Thoughts?
I know ancient Rome is located in the same region, but it does not adequately represent the renaissance Italian civ. By contrast, Greece has previously been represented with both an ancient Hellenic and a medieval Byzantine civ. (And now we're even getting a Macedonian iteration). Why not include a medieval Italian civ? The ancient Greeks were largely a collection of disjointed, rival city states, yet they are portrayed as a united civ. The Italian city-state situation was much the same, yet they are not present.
And then there's Venice. Yes, the portrayal of the Venetian civ in Civ5 will always be controversial. Some players liked playing as a virtual city-state... with only one city to call their own. Other players found this play-style to be too eclectic for their tastes. Now there's been talk of including Genoa as its own civ. If Venice was already controversial, methinks Genoa may be a further step in the wrong direction.
My proposal is simple. Let's be informed by the innovative portrayal of the Greeks in Civ6, with two different leaders reflecting the very different agendas of Athens and Sparta. Why not do the same with Italy? Pick two of the most prominent leaders from different renaissance city-states and craft different play-styles for the Italians while sharing a base civ.
We could even keep Enrico Dandolo and Venice for one of the two if you wish.
The other leader could be Cosimo or Lorenzo de Medici of Florence, who would be patrons of arts where the Venetians focused on more lucrative pursuits.
Or we could even be a little bit daring and feature a Borgia in game. We're focusing on "big" personalities in this game, after all.

Both leaders could share the Condottieri as a UU and the Piazza as a unique district.
Thoughts?