Leaderheads for the 3 missing traits

Frostyboy

Never Beaten
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Messages
1,046
Location
Norway
Hi!

I am trying to prepare a Mod for the "missing 3 traits"
Cha+Cre
Ind+Phi
Pro+Org

I have already made a thread for suggestions, but it has been inactive for a while: Missing Leaders Thread

For me it doesn't matter how realistic it is. I'm thinking about adding 3 leaders with these 3 trait-combos to already existing Civs, if I don't get any good suggestions. Of course, adding some new Civs with already made UU's and UB's would be great as well. I was hoping to give those civs with only 1 leader a second. Suggestions have been Israel and King Solomon for instance.

What I'm looking for is 3 good leaderheads for these 3.

Suggestions with links to the leaderheads anybody?
Any thoughs and help is appreciated :)
 
Download the CivGold mod. There's plenty of new (and animated) leaderheads there. Also, last week there were almost a dozen new animated leaderheads released, with threads in this forum. Surely you must have seen some of those threads?
 
Download the CivGold mod. There's plenty of new (and animated) leaderheads there. Also, last week there were almost a dozen new animated leaderheads released, with threads in this forum. Surely you must have seen some of those threads?

Civ Gold doesn't have any leader with Phi-Ind because it's "to" powerful.
 
Civ Gold doesn't have any leader with Phi-Ind because it's "to" powerful.

Thats true. I wonder what would happen if you mixed those traits with a personality like montezuma. he's a big attacker so he might not use those advantages. Or he could be even worse!
 
I always wondered if you just dropped the Wonder Bonus to 50% if that would make it less "powerful"

I mean any Philosophical leader starting next to a Stone or Marble source has somewhat similar effect to PHI/IND.

Imagine being Phi/Ind, and founding your capital on a plains/hill/stone! :drool:
 
Thanks for Replies :)
I had Easter vacation, but I'm ready to look after the right 3 ones.
Ind+Phi isn't any worse than playing Boudica with the Romans. The Praets are out of proportion too, only weighted by their (after my opinion) crappy UB (Forum)

So, please come with suggestions:
Who Should it Be?

Ind+Phi:
Cre+Cha:
Pro+Org:
 
With Pro/Org you could always go for Margaret Thatcher. I know she'd be a 4th English leader, but it fits her personality...

Cre/Cha sounds rather like Nero (the Roman Emperor) to me. Or if you want a third Roman, you could add Trajan as the Ind/Phi leader (Trajan was widely regarded as the best-ever Roman emperor). Hadrian would work as an Ind/Phi Roman as well - Hadrian's Wall, anyone?

You could always add a third leader to India and China too. The Ind/Phi combo would work well with those too (although you might not want to give India an Ind/Phi leader - with their fast workers that might make them a bit too successful).

Hope this has set you to thinking...
 
I'd think Trajan would be Ind/Imp as would most roman emperors, and I doubt Nero would be Charismatic.
 
Thanks for the suggestions. But, I rather see some of the one-leader civs have their 2nd.
Nero, I think would be Ind/Cre. He was Insane for sure, and unfinancial :D
 
Is there another Arab leader? Just thinking if you are thinking of adding one to a civ with only one they need another, but have no clue if there is one to fit the traits. I would think there are plenty of caliphates to look at though.
 
The UB for Rome is incredible, helps you crank out extra great people. Rome's an incredible Civ, especially with Augustus.

I think I'd have Hiawatha of the Native Americans as the Ind/Phi leader. I'd have to think about the other two. Maybe add another leader to Arabia and Holy Roman Empires, lot's of potential there and those Civs need a shakeup.
 
The UB for Rome is incredible, helps you crank out extra great people. Rome's an incredible Civ, especially with Augustus. .
I can't uncerstand why people find the Forum so great. It's a version of a Market, something which you don't normally build in all your cities (before against the end at least), and it's only 25%Gp growth which is a puny trait. This bad UB is supposed to counteract their increadible UU, which is too good.

I think I'd have Hiawatha of the Native Americans as the Ind/Phi leader. I'd have to think about the other two. Maybe add another leader to Arabia and Holy Roman Empires, lot's of potential there and those Civs need a shakeup.
Why Ind on an indian? DId they construct something big? A roman would be suitable, but they already have two leaders. HRE could be nice, but who? Charlemagne is by far the most known. Arab leaders, yes, that could be nice.
 
I can't uncerstand why people find the Forum so great. It's a version of a Market, something which you don't normally build in all your cities (before against the end at least), and it's only 25%Gp growth which is a puny trait. This bad UB is supposed to counteract their increadible UU, which is too good.

Why Ind on an indian? DId they construct something big? A roman would be suitable, but they already have two leaders. HRE could be nice, but who? Charlemagne is by far the most known. Arab leaders, yes, that could be nice.

There's already a Charles Quint LH art (made by me :D for HRE). He's probably the most known emperor after Charlemagne that was, in fact, not ruler of HRE.
 
There's already a Charles Quint LH art (made by me :D for HRE). He's probably the most known emperor after Charlemagne that was, in fact, not ruler of HRE.
Yes, that may work :)

Emek: Great Leaderheads. These might work.
 
Back
Top Bottom