gdr_willter
Korean Civ Fan
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2024
- Messages
- 422
Queen Seondeok.
Literally have no meaning in the history, unless she was a queen.
Literally have no meaning in the history, unless she was a queen.
It‘s not villain Italy. It‘s villain Machiavelli. He might as well lead the Mississippians. I‘m all for it.
The villainous Italian leader should be the subject of Machiavelli's treatise, not Machiavelli himself. (ie: Cesare Borgia).Villain Machiavelli would annoy me so much. He is really one of the more misunderstood persons. His „Prince“ was a satire that wasn‘t taken up as such. I think it‘s clear that all his advices aren‘t meant to add to a model of how a ruler righteous should really be.
I do agree though that he makes a great leader for civ 7. They just need to playtest so that his character doesn‘t become too predictable.
Just to really push the devs in their ability to capture motion and vocal styles: Kate Bush leads England.
Only if we can get Pelé leading Brazil and Walt Disney leading America.Just to really push the devs in their ability to capture motion and vocal styles: Kate Bush leads England.
Just to really push the devs in their ability to capture motion and vocal styles: Kate Bush leads England.
A "Global Divas" DLC?
The cursed monkey paw could earn overtime messing up that one!
I see you are on the good timeline...Yma Sumac leads the Inca!
Bjork leads Iceland!
Yzma leads the Inca? But she never cared for your spinach puffs!Yma Sumac leads the Inca!
Yzma leads the Inca? But she never cared for your spinach puffs!
I think she's dead, but Cree Summer can take over the role like she did in the spinoff. (I haven't seen the spinoff, but Cree Summer is great so I can't imagine it was the worst recasting.)Eartha Kitt as second Inca leader.
I think she's dead, but Cree Summer can take over the role like she did in the spinoff. (I haven't seen the spinoff, but Cree Summer is great so I can't imagine it was the worst recasting.)
I really like the idea of using Pulaski to bridge an exploration Poland to a modern USA. It bypasses the ugliness of Poland going into Russia and Germany. (Granted a modern Poland-Lithuania also does this).Since leaders are detached from civilizations:
Francis Marion (could unlock America & Britain)
Lafayette (could unlock America & France)
Pulaski (could unlock America & Poland)
I really like the idea of using Pulaski to bridge an exploration Poland to a modern USA. It bypasses the ugliness of Poland going into Russia and Germany. (Granted a modern Poland-Lithuania also does this).
Also Chicago, where there’s the big annual Pulaski Day parade, is home to more Poles (or maybe just people of Polish descent) than Warsaw.
She paved the way for Korea's unity under Silla later, and I think she was quite accomplished in the sciences and arts. I think she's a worthy leader who was also capably served by able generals.Queen Seondeok.
Literally have no meaning in the history, unless she was a queen.
That would be great! I advocated for Zenobia to be added to Civ previously, along with Seondeok and Six Sky (who made it into the game after my suggestions! )Fair. I think we will see a handful of "leaders without civs" in Civ7. Zenobia and Charlemagne are prime candidates.