Let Killer back!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because TF hasn't updated it.

This was changed OVER a year ago, as we often had people come here and start trouble, and nothing gets resolved this way.

Ok, thanks for the quick answer. :)
 
Guys, you can talk to me ANYTIME, I answer ALL PMs.

But like this, all you will get is hostility.

Killer was banned for two reasons, the first was, he accused me of misusing my authority (when I had banned or warned nobody), and instead of discussing it privately, he chose to say "now I will report you to Thunderfall", which is a THREAT.

How many of you would permit a poster to threaten you?

Not many, I'm sure.
 
Originally posted by Alcibiaties of Athenae
I can be very resonable, as ERIKK about it.
This is true, I realise now that I could have been banned for my Killer-post over at the other thread. But I wasn't.

As far as the rules are concerned. This should be updated ASAP. Changed rules are worthless.

ERIKK
 
Originally posted by Alcibiaties of Athenae
Certain posters have a problem because the phrase "Third Reich Team" was removed, and they still play out that grudge.
Yes, CDG, we monitor you also.

Alcibiaties, you are more than welcome to monitor CDG if you wish.

But I can assure you that last year's events are history, and no bad blood remains.

The TRT is happy in it's new site and has no problem with the CFC.

As an Admin on CDG it is my job to make sure no nastiness like this exists between our sites.

Accept my apologies on behalf of any of our posters, if you deem them to have been out of line.

I am a man of peace and reason, as you know.

Regards,
Curt.
 
AoA, You have just posted back in the original thread, and state there that people are circumventing the rules deliberately. I quote:

"...but it seems a number of people are now trying to play a little game here, and I won't have it."

I think you have misunderstood me at least, as this simply not true. I am not trying to get around anything or play any games, I was following what is written in the site rules, the same rules linked by you and every other mod for every mod action.

I have the upmost respect for you as a mod (and indeed all mods), but if I think a mod has done something wrong and PM them, will they not just PM me back saying I am wrong? What then? Can I then go to TF?

Note that I am still asking for clarification on the rules, and will not post anything about the incident here unless I am explictly told I can do so.

I have not PM'd you this, as the site rules are unclear, and I am sure many people will want clarification on this sensitive issue.
 
OMG, this is unbelieveable. :eek: Its a massacre.

If I share my true opinion, AoA would ban me, too. :rolleyes:

BTW, AoA, Thunderfall is the admin of the site, not you. A poster has every right to question your athourity, in private that is. You cannot ban someone for privately contacting your ADMIN.

I think you should just unban those that were banned because they only did whatever the hell they did out of sheer dis-respect for you. It isn't good as a mod if you are not respected.
 
Originally posted by anarres
I have the upmost respect for you as a mod (and indeed all mods), but if I think a mod has done something wrong and PM them, will they not just PM me back saying I am wrong? What then? Can I then go to TF?
EXACTLY.

That way, you are protected as a poster, as you can show him PROOF that your enquiry was ignored, and the moderator can show him PROOF that they tried to resolve the situation.
 
Certain posters have a problem because the phrase "Third Reich Team" was removed, and they still play out that grudge. Yes, CDG, we monitor you also.

As Curt said AoA, what is past is past. Everyone is quite aware that BOTH sites monitor each each very closely indeed. I can only speak for CDG of course but on our part it is mostly to ensure that bad blood does not re-emerge between us. Despite past disagreements we are not enemies, just two sites trying to provide a service to the civ community. We both have different rules and different ways of dealing with issues but one of our highest priorities has been to show to the rest of the community that we are a part of the group, not a renegade bunch of idiots trying to throw a spanner in the works.

This is why CDG and CFC have established communications channels for dealing with issues that arise. If you feel at any time that our name is being used to try and circumnavigate your rules, please feel free to contact any of us directly through PM or IM and we will do what we can to help rectify the situation.

Kentonio
 
Originally posted by Ohwell
OMG, this is unbelieveable. :eek: Its a massacre.
It's proof positive of why we stopped having these threads.

If I share my true opinion, AoA would ban me, too.
Only fair, if I gave my true opinion of you I wouldn't be able to moderate either.

BTW, AoA, Thunderfall is the admin of the site, not you. A poster has every right to question your athourity, in private that is. You cannot ban someone for privately contacting your ADMIN.
Pay attention dear boy, the key word is PRIVATELY.
Someone calls me a dictator in a thread and threatens me, I can and will.
Count on it.

I think you should just unban those that were banned because they only did whatever the hell they did out of sheer dis-respect for you. It isn't good as a mod if you are not respected.
Disrespect of site authority is a BANABLE offense.
You just said they did EXACTLY that. :rolleyes:

Let me make this clear, I don't care if you like me or my opinions, but you will follow the rules, or be removed.
 
Very good Kentaro, I quite agree, however, didn't we ask you to NOT use the name "Thrid Reich team" here?

I see it in your signature most prominently sir.
 
My apologies, I was not aware the term had been banned completely, probably because I wasnt present at the time of the previous disagreements until a week or so afterwards having been on vacation. The phrase in question will be removed immediately.

Kentonio
 
No, we only asked that you make it clear that the team is a unit making organization.

I'm sure you understand about that.
 
[02.07.2003 11:09.57] 126637453: I don't find you avatar very funny.
[02.07.2003 11:10.12] munzy: So?
[02.07.2003 11:10.23] 126637453: So change it
[02.07.2003 11:10.27] munzy: Ah, no.
[02.07.2003 11:10.34] 126637453: Ah, Banned
[02.07.2003 11:10.38] munzy: So?
[02.07.2003 11:10.42] 126637453: Jackass
[02.07.2003 11:10.47] munzy: That you are
 
It's proof positive of why we stopped having these threads.

I don't like the threads either because they show everyones true colors.


Only fair, if I gave my true opinion of you I wouldn't be able to moderate either.

Please, can you share this opinion with me in a PM? I'm always wondering what people feel about me. Call me self-concious, but thats just me.

Pay attention dear boy, the key word is PRIVATELY.
Someone calls me a dictator in a thread and threatens me, I can and will.
Count on it.

Do you expect me to respect you when you call me "boy"?

I'm trying to be reasonable here, so notice that I am taking no sides. I support the fact that moderators can and should be questions, PRIVATELY. As you said, that word is the key.

Disrespect of site authority is a BANABLE offense.

Wrong word there. I think the correct word you are looking for is dis-obedience and dis-regarding of site athority. Which I agree with. See, respecting someone means you see them as a role model or an example to others. At least thats my definition.

Let me make this clear, I don't care if you like me or my opinions, but you will follow the rules, or be removed.

This isn't about your political opinions, your opinions are your own and I don't mind them. And I am not breaking any rules, I'm just trying to put some reason into this thread. But you just throw everything away as an "insult".

I see your backed into a corner so that might be why you are getting angry, but in your place I would just relax. Its not like anyone is trying to kill you.
 
As I say, I missed most of the discussion at the time as by the time I returned many threads/posts had been removed so I never got the exact details, no matter Im happy to remove the sig if it causes a problem. Dont want to rake up any past troubles by me being not very well informed. ;)

Kentonio
 
Originally posted by Ohwell
I don't like the threads either because they show everyones true colors.
Yes, sometimes people with long time grudges show up, just to throw insults about.

Please, can you share this opinion with me in a PM? I'm always wondering what people feel about me. Call me self-concious, but thats just me.
You can write me anytime.

Do you expect me to respect you when you call me "boy"?
Little sensitive, aern't you?
Dear boy was merely a term of edearment, if you dislike it, we can certainly be rid of it.

I'm trying to be reasonable here, so notice that I am taking no sides. I support the fact that moderators can and should be questions, PRIVATELY. As you said, that word is the key.
Exactly.

Wrong word there. I think the correct word you are looking for is dis-obedience and dis-regarding of site athority. Which I agree with. See, respecting someone means you see them as a role model or an example to others. At least thats my definition.
Playing semantics?

This isn't about your political opinions, your opinions are your own and I don't mind them. And I am not breaking any rules, I'm just trying to put some reason into this thread. But you just throw everything away as an "insult".
Oh, Killer calls me a dictator, who will pay for it, gets banned, and I see a thread telling me I should let him off poste haste, my mistake for misinterpreting that.

I see your backed into a corner so that might be why you are getting angry, but in your place I would just relax. Its not like anyone is trying to kill you.
Not at all.

This doesn't distress me overmuch, but I will have order here.
 
Omni, you better edit that before it gets ugly...
 
Yes, i have nothing better to do then ban posters all day. :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom