Came across the following article in the NY Times, which is pretty interesting...
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/18/science/social/18INCA.html
Based on the latest research (on Spanish records and forgotten Machu Picchu excavated relics in a Yale basement), apparently Machu Picchu wasn't any final Incan bastion, or Incan lost city.
It was a private estate of the Incan emperor, or what the head of state was known as. Sort of like a Incan version of Camp David, on a more grandiose scale. A private retreat for the emperor and important nobles and visitors.
Read the articles for the full report.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/18/science/social/18INCA.html
Based on the latest research (on Spanish records and forgotten Machu Picchu excavated relics in a Yale basement), apparently Machu Picchu wasn't any final Incan bastion, or Incan lost city.
It was a private estate of the Incan emperor, or what the head of state was known as. Sort of like a Incan version of Camp David, on a more grandiose scale. A private retreat for the emperor and important nobles and visitors.
Read the articles for the full report.
