Math Test, Please Help

oh damn. i copied the equation wrong.
there we go :)
44glctj.png


I also don't get this one: Please explain a little more
 
NVM, I get 17 now. Thank you B etor :D

Are you in Mrs. Rockwoods?
 
oh. too late, it's more colorful now.

mrs. rockwoods!? no, i have no idea who that is. lol

and ANY TIME! =]
 
oh. too late, it's more colorful now.

mrs. rockwoods!? no, i have no idea who that is. lol

and ANY TIME! =]

I get it, thanks :)

The Math Teacher at my boarding school

How about next week ;)
 
oh. i definitely don't go to your school. haha.

sure thing.

do you have any messanger services? it might be faster/more efficient that way so i could explain it better
 
lakoria.PNG


Mrs. Rockwood's Blitzkreig strikes again :(

I have to simplify
 
lakoria.PNG


Mrs. Rockwood's Blitzkreig strikes again :(

I have to simplify

sqrt(5) + sqrt(1/5)
= sqrt(5) + sqrt(1)/sqrt(5)
= sqrt(5)sqrt(5)/sqrt(5) + sqrt(1) / sqrt(5)
= [ sqrt(5)^2 + sqrt(1) ] / sqrt(5)
= ( 5 + 1 ) / sqrt(5)
= 6 / sqrt(5)

did i make a mistake anywhere?
 
sqrt(5) + sqrt(1/5)
= sqrt(5) + sqrt(1)/sqrt(5)
= sqrt(5)sqrt(5)/sqrt(5) + sqrt(1) / sqrt(5)
= [ sqrt(5)^2 + sqrt(1) ] / sqrt(5)
= ( 5 + 1 ) / sqrt(5)
= 6 / sqrt(5)

did i make a mistake anywhere?

No square roots on bottom :(
 
It's solid, except that a radical sign cannot be in a denominator.

6/sqrt(5)
= 6/sqrt(5) * sqrt(5)/sqrt(5)
= [6*sqrt(5)]/5

As far as I know, people used to use that because it's much easier to estimate the value of something with a radical in the numerator than the denominator. That's not much of an issue anymore now that we have calculators, though. Not that it's really that difficult to multiply by sqrt(5)/sqrt(5) or that we don't have the same rule...
 
As far as I know, people used to use that because it's much easier to estimate the value of something with a radical in the numerator than the denominator. That's not much of an issue anymore now that we have calculators, though. Not that it's really that difficult to multiply by sqrt(5)/sqrt(5) or that we don't have the same rule...

Sure, but if one could simply use a calculator, one would not be learning said lesson in the first place. A negative number can't be in a denominator, either, technically, but again, that doesn't really matter to my TI-83+.

Right..

It's a simple problem but I rather rushed it ;) and that's just being picky ;)

Sure, but if the guy has to see how it's done, might as well show as many steps as possible, no?

:)
 
Back
Top Bottom