Mechanos question/help

[AgentTBC]

I feel like I being a jerk nitpicking this but I can't help it: Is 349 years really "almost 500"?

Sorry.

 

[Ahwaric]

And I feel it has to stop. Please guys, it is going nowhere, it is obvious that no side will convice the other, plus this thread is for matters that are not even related to your discussion.

Thus said, I think we should not generalize on such topics. There are many things that you can say on any army. Like telling that Polish army liked horses too much to be succesfull, our cavalry charged on tanks and we liked to fight wars that had no chance to be won from the start. So yes, it did but it served it quite well for a long time, and no, we never charged the german tanks. We used anti-armor cannons pulled by horses. And well, we won a few wars, long ago. And 10% of our uprisings turned things better, not worse.

So yes, Napoleon was an Italian. But his army was French (Columbus was too, but his discoveries were for Spain). And Napoleon was not the only successfull French general.

 

[Crezth]

No, indeed, but my point was and always has been that the French army's stereotype of "incompetence" isn't, as my honorable opponent asserted, unfounded. I believe I made my point. However, with respect to the thread creator I will stop.

 

[BenjaminEmbarec]

Oh no, don't stop on my account.

But it really is off topic I suppose. Whether I agree with one side or the other notwithstanding.. <.< >.>