Stochastic
Prince
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2009
- Messages
- 411
Perhaps move warrior, post the image and then discuss settlement?
Here is my fog peaking analysis:
If I'm right, it doesn't look like we have that much of a shortage of Flood plains, what I'm more concerned about are mines for production. While we can certainly use all the food surplus to crank out settlers and workers, we will probably need a bunch of warriors too, so that 3
tile will be very helpful before we get mines out.
Because I would only consider moving the settler if it gained another visible resource and since the warrior won't be useful in showing close resources out of our BFC I'm leaning towards SIP. Therefore I don't think there is much difference between moving the warrior NW or SE. Maybe go NW and then follow the river for potential trade routes and defense?
Interesting point about avoiding AH for a bit happyturtle, I'm not going to think about tech paths until we can see all the land in our BFC, but it certainly would be nice to avoid that relatively expensive tech.
Here is my fog peaking analysis:
Spoiler :

If I'm right, it doesn't look like we have that much of a shortage of Flood plains, what I'm more concerned about are mines for production. While we can certainly use all the food surplus to crank out settlers and workers, we will probably need a bunch of warriors too, so that 3

Because I would only consider moving the settler if it gained another visible resource and since the warrior won't be useful in showing close resources out of our BFC I'm leaning towards SIP. Therefore I don't think there is much difference between moving the warrior NW or SE. Maybe go NW and then follow the river for potential trade routes and defense?
Interesting point about avoiding AH for a bit happyturtle, I'm not going to think about tech paths until we can see all the land in our BFC, but it certainly would be nice to avoid that relatively expensive tech.