Yesterday we got the result of the trial of Charlie Hebdo, a French magazine where 3 of the Danish cartoons on Mohammed were published.
Instead of rioting, the French muslims made an official complaint that these drawing where insulting on a religion or race basis.
The tribunal decided the magazine was not guilty, as the drawings were with texts showing they were directed to fundamentalists using islam as an excuse for terrorism, and not toward muslims in general.
The tribunal recognized that some of the drawings could be seen as shocking if taken alone, but put in the context they were not.
One of the muslim organization declared they were satisfy with the judgement, another one wants an appeal.
Instead of rioting, the French muslims made an official complaint that these drawing where insulting on a religion or race basis.
The tribunal decided the magazine was not guilty, as the drawings were with texts showing they were directed to fundamentalists using islam as an excuse for terrorism, and not toward muslims in general.
The tribunal recognized that some of the drawings could be seen as shocking if taken alone, but put in the context they were not.
One of the muslim organization declared they were satisfy with the judgement, another one wants an appeal.