Ai Shizuka
King
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2008
- Messages
- 856
Hi, as said here, I moved to Noble level.
The first game was quite bad. I picked Kubilai Khan on a huge Great Plains map, to try a warmongering approach. Rushed Charlemagne and Ragnar with Keshiks. Then barbarians started to be a huge annoyance: with no chokepoints to defend (great plains), they forced me to guard pretty much every city at 360°.
So I decided to go for Bismark and his Great Wall. But his empire was in the north-western corner of the map, a horrible wasteland of hills and mountains, and every single one of his cities was on hills.
Result: a painfully slow war, wich dragged until '700.
At that point, Pacal and Willem had a huge tech advantage on me. Both of them was friendly or pleased. Not that I had any real chance to attack them with decent results anyway. The only possible target was a backward Tokugawa, but he was completely boxed in a corner by Darius, wich refused to talk for the last thousand years. War on Darius was not an option.
So, it was just a matter of time for Pacal or Willem to launch their spaceships. No chance for diplo or cultural victories. So I retired and got my first Dan Quayle. Oh well.
First lesson learned: screw Great Plains. Don't know if it's always like that, but it was horribly imbalanced. The eastern empires was on nice lands full of grasslands, forests and a nice amount of hills.
I was in the middle barrens: 90% of my land was plains with hordes of cows and not much more (some 15 cows connected BC). No forests to chop, no hills, nothing.
And the poor western empires (Toku and Bismark) was nested into the mountains.
Second lesson: move to smaller map formats. I think huge is a bit unfriendly to any noobish warmongering approach.
Now, on what I consider my first real Noble game.
Mansa Musa, Pangaea, large map, epic speed, temperate, medium sea level.
Axe rushed Ramesses and got a nice double holy city with Stonehenge.
Then moved on Suryavarman with axes and swords and got 3 new cities (including Confu holy city).
Recovered a bit and moved on Justinian with maces and cata/trebs. Easy but quite long war. When I came to Sitting Bull's land it was my rifles (upgraded to infantry during the war) and cavalry vs. longbows. Easy war with 1 lone cavalry dead on my side.
My neighbor is Hannibal, wich has been very friendly from the beginning. My empire is divided in two parts by a couple of his cities. His empire is quite big and he's right behind me in pretty much every category.
Diplo situation: Stalin and Charlemagne are very close friends and have a defensive pact. They both hate me with a passion but never declared war. Toku is my very friendly vassal. He's last in score, but was second in the recent "most advanced" hit parade, has a nice empire and I think it can hold his own in a possible war vs Stalin+Charles.
Now it's 1911 (and the attached save is at this year) and I'm not sure on what to do. I have a strong lead in score and tech, so space victory is an easy option.
Charles has the AP, but he has the votes of Stalin only, while Toku and Hannibal always abstain. I have the UN, and I think I can control it.
Score victory is 100% sure, but I don't want it.
Cultural is out of reach for everyone.
I would really like to keep waring, but I'm not sure. And here I'd appreciate any tips/advice from the experts.
Hannibal is not going to get involved in the war.
Both Stalin and Charles have rifles and cannons. I think I can wipe Charles pretty quickly: I have a nice amount of infantry with CR bonus in my stack ready on his border and can produced more units quickly.
But I'm not really sure about Toku. He would be on his own vs Stalin until I'm done with Charles.
So what do you think I should do?
Declare on Charles+Stalin.
Turtle and go for space.
Declare on Hannibal?
The first game was quite bad. I picked Kubilai Khan on a huge Great Plains map, to try a warmongering approach. Rushed Charlemagne and Ragnar with Keshiks. Then barbarians started to be a huge annoyance: with no chokepoints to defend (great plains), they forced me to guard pretty much every city at 360°.
So I decided to go for Bismark and his Great Wall. But his empire was in the north-western corner of the map, a horrible wasteland of hills and mountains, and every single one of his cities was on hills.
Result: a painfully slow war, wich dragged until '700.
At that point, Pacal and Willem had a huge tech advantage on me. Both of them was friendly or pleased. Not that I had any real chance to attack them with decent results anyway. The only possible target was a backward Tokugawa, but he was completely boxed in a corner by Darius, wich refused to talk for the last thousand years. War on Darius was not an option.
So, it was just a matter of time for Pacal or Willem to launch their spaceships. No chance for diplo or cultural victories. So I retired and got my first Dan Quayle. Oh well.
First lesson learned: screw Great Plains. Don't know if it's always like that, but it was horribly imbalanced. The eastern empires was on nice lands full of grasslands, forests and a nice amount of hills.
I was in the middle barrens: 90% of my land was plains with hordes of cows and not much more (some 15 cows connected BC). No forests to chop, no hills, nothing.
And the poor western empires (Toku and Bismark) was nested into the mountains.
Second lesson: move to smaller map formats. I think huge is a bit unfriendly to any noobish warmongering approach.
Now, on what I consider my first real Noble game.
Mansa Musa, Pangaea, large map, epic speed, temperate, medium sea level.
Axe rushed Ramesses and got a nice double holy city with Stonehenge.
Then moved on Suryavarman with axes and swords and got 3 new cities (including Confu holy city).
Recovered a bit and moved on Justinian with maces and cata/trebs. Easy but quite long war. When I came to Sitting Bull's land it was my rifles (upgraded to infantry during the war) and cavalry vs. longbows. Easy war with 1 lone cavalry dead on my side.
My neighbor is Hannibal, wich has been very friendly from the beginning. My empire is divided in two parts by a couple of his cities. His empire is quite big and he's right behind me in pretty much every category.
Diplo situation: Stalin and Charlemagne are very close friends and have a defensive pact. They both hate me with a passion but never declared war. Toku is my very friendly vassal. He's last in score, but was second in the recent "most advanced" hit parade, has a nice empire and I think it can hold his own in a possible war vs Stalin+Charles.
Now it's 1911 (and the attached save is at this year) and I'm not sure on what to do. I have a strong lead in score and tech, so space victory is an easy option.
Charles has the AP, but he has the votes of Stalin only, while Toku and Hannibal always abstain. I have the UN, and I think I can control it.
Score victory is 100% sure, but I don't want it.
Cultural is out of reach for everyone.
I would really like to keep waring, but I'm not sure. And here I'd appreciate any tips/advice from the experts.
Hannibal is not going to get involved in the war.
Both Stalin and Charles have rifles and cannons. I think I can wipe Charles pretty quickly: I have a nice amount of infantry with CR bonus in my stack ready on his border and can produced more units quickly.
But I'm not really sure about Toku. He would be on his own vs Stalin until I'm done with Charles.
So what do you think I should do?
Declare on Charles+Stalin.
Turtle and go for space.
Declare on Hannibal?