No More Nukes?

Get rid of all nukes forever?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 37 69.8%
  • It depends. (On what?)

    Votes: 3 5.7%
  • No.

    Votes: 13 24.5%

  • Total voters
    53
Originally posted by Simon Darkshade
Keep them!
Love them!
Appreciate them!
>gets so worked up he leaps out of seat<
Mein Fuhrer! I CAN WALK!!!!!! :D

How you gave up caring and learned to love the bomb!
:lol:
 
We have other weapons that might hurt the other countries mor eand kill less peole we have some sort of plane(or bomb, if it's a bomb this completely wrecks my argumnet) that is a thousand times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.
 
Originally posted by Warlord56
We have other weapons that might hurt the other countries mor eand kill less peole we have some sort of plane(or bomb, if it's a bomb this completely wrecks my argumnet) that is a thousand times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.

That's the hydrogen bomb all right. 100% Nuclear weapon.
 
1900-1950. Number of victims in the world as result of wars.
1950-2002. Number of victims in the world as result of wars.
THANK the nuke.

Dont all of you see a pattern here?

The deadlier our weapons get, the more we are sorry about it, the less deadly wars start, the more we predict total vaporization of human kind.


The deadliest biological weapon is nature.
The most fearsome weapon of all is nature.
Nuke is the only thing that keeps this world stable, folks.
Look at the results of WW1, look at the results of WW2, and just THINK what would happen in WW2 if it wasnt for the nuke, and what would happen in WW3, and we all sorta know when it would occur.
If you leave the nukes out, its just a matter of time before a country finishes its most deadly conventional missile, and its biggest heaviest fastest tank and go test it on someone with some stupid reason to start a war, and the results of that are MUCH more terrible than the results of a world with nukes that restrain such wars from happening.
Even if a terrorist get his hands on a nuke and blows it in the heart of manhattan, the results of total amount of victims are considerably less than the results of a 3rd world war starting today, with todays conventional weapons. just think about it.
 
Iceblaze,

The detonation of a nuke on US soil would be the precipitaion of WW3...Same goes for Europe...

All it takes is one....:(
 
I don't deny that nukes were probably a reason we haven't had another world war.

But let's keep this in perspective, here. I know how horrible the world wars were.

Still, can any of us actually say that we would prefer to see the world destroyed and the extinction of the human species to another world war, however horrible????

The fact is, if the nukes exist, that possibility does exist. Is it even close to being worth it????
 
I believe an interesting question would be, what would happen if a nuke exploded in Washington or Moscow.

Is the US and Russian system safe enough to handle a terrorist attack with a nuke without overreacting: Launch a counterstrike.

What if the terrorist fired a few missiles at the same time from some location in Russia into Europe?

Would a combined action like that foul the system and have the other side react into a full retaliation?

Get rid of all Nukes!
 
In Modern Studies I'm currently doing the superpowers and basically looking at the cold war. Now my teacher was talking about the effect of a nuclear weapon on Britain if say it was fired at London. Now with London down, the country would collapse, no TV, Radio, Government, nothing! So one bomb can destroy a whole country.
Now as for the threat of nuclear terrorism, that's a different matter. I believe maybe some of these terrorists have access to nuclear weapons. I was watching this programme on the Russian Mafia and it talked about how some arms dealers claimed to have access to a nuclear warhead.
If that is true then it's all a matter of getting the nuke and delivering it, which terrorists can not do because they do not have the technology.

Dexter


As for the poll I voted "no" because they have been instrumental in stopping wars but maybe I think I should have voted it depends.
 
Originally posted by knowltok2
This is a hypothetical, and in it, there would be no possibility of any more nuclear weapons.
Given this unlikely premise, definately yes.
 
Actually, nuclear weapons went far too close in the Cold War to destroying the ENTIRE EARTH.

Khrushchez had plans for an armagedden bomb to be built, that should COMMUNISM EVER FAIL, the ENTIRE WORLD would be DESTROYED!

Luckily Khrushchez scrapped that idea and it has since never been tried again. But what if someone suddenly had the idea and power to do it, should say the U.S.A. would be destroyed or Islam defeated etc.
Nuclear prevention can probably be attempted without having nuclear weapons. My history teacher had the idea that if you put an empty box in a high-security centre, and claim that it has the power to destroy the whole world, and that if any nation sent spies etc to try to find out about it, the weapon will immediately destroy itself and the whole world. How many people would dare to look?

M.A.D., Mutually Assured Destruction, the Detente(spel?), the belief that nuclear weapons save the world and prevent major wars. Rubbish! We have had many minor conflicts since the second world war, and was a single nuclear bomb dropped? If the nations of the world had such weapons as to destroy the world three times over, why have none ever been deployed? Eventually tyrants and dictators will not be afraid of such devices, and the world will be plunged into that which it was, almost continual war. Yes, destroy all nuclear missiles, conventional wars are bad enough. And while your at it, destroy B's and C's as well.
Then destroy bombs, guns crossbows, tanks etc There will probably still be wars after all the weapons havd disappeared, for a human can be a weapon, if properly trained. So to destroy the ultimate weapon, you would have to destroy the whole human race and what does that lead us on to? Atomic weapons!
Let us leave all this weapon technology at tanks. And pray for peace.
 
I'll vote yes... as long as we get to keep them in Civ games :)
 
Nukes will never go away, unless and until the human race develops a deadlier weapon. once the genie is out of the bottle, there is no going back. we can reduce the numbers, but the major powers will never give up all of them. nobody trusts anybody enough to do that. AND the tech is still available to any nation the wants to build one.
 
Back
Top Bottom