nuclear weopons

[Harbringer]

Thy need to have different types of nuclear weopons such as medium range ballistics missiles and short range ballistics missiles and Tridents and Atlases and stuff like that, not just ICBM's and M1 Tactical liberators.

 

[Gogf]

I agree, but different missiles should have different amounts of potency. And the first nuclear weapons should be dropped from planes. It would also be nice if you would have to perfect the technology before using it (or risk it not working), and so there is a reason to test it in your own territory/ocean.

 

[GenMarshall]

They should consider having a nuclear artillery. There is such thing as a nuclear artillery and its called "Atomic Annie"

More information about Atomic Annie and other Nuclear Artillery can be found here.

 

[dh_epic]

I think more important than modelling the dozens of different kinds of nuclear weapons would be the political effects of living in the age of nuclear weapons.

I don't care about "bigger, better, stronger, faster" units. It doesn't really add much to the game.

 

[Colonel]

Simply add this, Bombers to drop A-Bombs, have a couple different types of Missles, Tactical, MRBMS, and ICBM, and the ability to put them in a silo like thing on your terriotory and ally territory.