Taras Bulba
gone
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2007
- Messages
- 1,442
i've been playing Civ III for quite some time now, and i would like to become a better player, but i seem to be trapped in my old ways i picked up in Cheiften 
as i am now determined to move up to Warlord/Regent, i can never decide which is better:
play a game with lots of opponents
play a game with fewer opponents
lots of opponents, i always get crowded out for space, but fewer opponents i can never trade for techs, and fall behind in the tech race
PS-side question, when you're not building units, should i build very many buildings in my cities, or not? is just setting the city to wealth a bad thing in the early ages? just thought i'd ask while i ask this question

as i am now determined to move up to Warlord/Regent, i can never decide which is better:
play a game with lots of opponents
play a game with fewer opponents
lots of opponents, i always get crowded out for space, but fewer opponents i can never trade for techs, and fall behind in the tech race
PS-side question, when you're not building units, should i build very many buildings in my cities, or not? is just setting the city to wealth a bad thing in the early ages? just thought i'd ask while i ask this question