Obama makes Olbermann's "Worst Person" list

[dwaxe]

WTH? Did you guys even watch the video?

 

[Phlegmak]

You really don't have any idea of the point I was making, do you? It's not just about hatred. It is about organized hate-based propaganda being perpetuated by a supposed news source.

Meaningful similarities:

1) Hate-based propaganda
2) Website that pretends to be news

Sorry, I don't know any other websites like that.

Of course, every left-wing-wackjob will now jump to the defense of puffingfront. Shall I make a list of the soon-to-respond? How can this not be obvious to everyone else.

Ah, yes, I'm a left-wing-wackjob now. Great.

So, please provide an example of this hate based propaganda. You can provide just one example if you want. And I mean from Huffington Post.

And using your own silly term, you're an equatist.

EDIT: I watched the first half of the video. Regarding Obama, it's silly.

 

[I'm Cleo!]

You keep using this word, "hate." I do not think it means what you think it means.

Cleo

 

[Miles Teg]

I call em like I see em. Hate-based websites. Garbage passing as information.

Posting a huffington article is (intellectually) the same thing as posting a stormfront article.

I seem to remember posting something like this before, but I don't remember reading a reply-not sure if you lost interest in the topic or I did. Anyways,

What kind of hyped up Human Event's smoking conservative are you that you're so arrogantly filled up with your own noxious self superiority that you think Huffington Post is the equivalent of Stormfront?

Let's ignore the fact that you compared liberals to Neo-Nazis, Godwining a thread is it's own proof of stupidity. What cesspit of the human id do you burrow into for ideas that really makes you think that Stormfornt, with all of it's paranoid ranting and completely fictional figures, in anyway compares to Huffington, which is about as biased as the WSJ editorial board? They're both horribly biased sources of new, but they're hardly the fountain of hateful propaganda that is Stormfront.

I don't know how it possibly came into your head that making outrageous comparisons is 'telling it like is', but until you learn some manners and some basic common sense, I recommend you go sit in the corner and shut up when the adults are talking.

And no, to answer your budding counterattack, I'm not a habitual Huffington reader. If I want a liberal news site, I read The New Republic. Because I prefer moderate liberals bashing conservatives.

 

[IglooDame]

Okay, who here has actually browsed stormfront.org?

 

[Ecofarm]

I went there once to see. It was not pretty.

 

[History_Buff]

Okay, who here has actually browsed stormfront.org?

I just went there now after I saw that, and I have to say that's a bunch of depressing individuals.

Eco, if you do believe that Stormfront is just as bad as Huffington (I didn't actually read the post where you allegedly equated them), that's messed up. If your political views are evenly spaced between Stormfront and Huffington, well, that's a little terrifying. Bloody terrorist

 

[Phlegmak]

Okay, who here has actually browsed stormfront.org?

I have, long ago.

 

[Bigfoot3814]

Anybody who keeps a 'list of the worst people' probably ought to be on the list themselves.

 

[Sims2789]

Something tells me that this is an amazingly self (democrat)-serving criticism.

I don't read puffington articles, just like I don't read stormfront articles. They're pretty much the same thing.

Not O'Reilly. He's a stand up guy.

And not Colmes, c'mon... that guy might be the lamest token on cable news. He can't even piss off the republicans. At least tokens on CNN are infuriating to liberals. He actually makes liberals look nice and tolerant; what kinda crap is that. I want a real token; someone we can throw tomatoes at.

I posted the Huffington article because it has the video in it. The video is also probably on Olbermann's website.

Okay, who here has actually browsed stormfront.org?

I went about six months ago, out of curiosity. A surprising number of the bigots are for abortion since they think it reduces black births.

 

[IglooDame]

I went about six months ago, out of curiosity. A surprising number of the bigots are for abortion since they think it reduces black births.

Now see there's a spectacularly good example of how a political position can be the result of completely contrary motives or philosophies.