On Stonehenge again...

[allhailIndia]

Originally posted by Perfection

Oh, and how is "Bite" "me" an answer?

If you don't like my views and you DARE to question me, you can go boil your head coz I'm right and you're wrong nyanya

 

[Garry Denke]

I'm still not getting where the wood and bone are symbolized and how they act as symbols?

Wood and bone? are symbols? Clang clang! a band.

 

[Garry Denke]

Originally posted by allhailIndia
If you don't like my views and you DARE to question me, you can go boil your head coz I'm right and you're wrong nyanya

"Bite"

"Me"

 

[Xen]

the main flaw in the entire theory of stonehenge -this time- representing the jaw/oral structure is that it isnt important- think about it, how often do you go about even knowing the interior anatomy of your- let alone anyones elses'- oral cavity- its not important to know nok (unless you a memeber of a orthadontic profession), and even less impoirtant the farther back you go- while genitalia are held in high reagrd throught time and history- its importance, that of giving birth to the next generation- is unquestioned and revered even in our time

combine this with the fact that it isnt likelly that the jaw is astetically pleasing, nor its structure well known, despite how easy it is, makes the case for it being its design flawed to say the least.

 

[Knight-Dragon]

This doesn't seem to lead anywhere... Sorry Garry, I'll have to close this... Bait for just that kind of posts...