On the addition of Dinosaurs.

Why? From their point of view Dinosaurs were created on Day Six. (Genesis 1:24, 25).

Creationists don't (necessarily) deny the existance of Dinosaurs. They just believe all creatures, living and extinct, were created by God as perfect, complete beings.
Most also belive dinosaurs existed alongside humans and earth is at most tens of thousands of years old.
 
Most also belive dinosaurs existed alongside humans and earth is at most tens of thousands of years old.

Ha! Those Fools.

Earth started on 4000BC, Turn one.

Spain appeared as DLC later.

It is known.
 
Wild animals from Civ 4 would be nice, though.
 
But monkeys are still giving birth to monkey why don't they give birth to a human today?
 
But monkeys are still giving birth to monkey why don't they give birth to a human today?

That's something that evolutionists have never been able to answer.

How can monkeys exist today if we evolved from them?
 
Wait, this is speculation right, where did it say there's two types of Museums?

No think of it like like Hotwings. You could get your Hotwings with Onion Rings or with Fries. If you get it with fries maybe it'd be a Hotwings of Natural History & if you get it with fries it'd be a Hotwings of French Modern Art.

All we have so far are screenshots of museums with and without Dino bones out front. But they wouldn't be something you build with hammers. So it stands to reason they'd be a new dig site feature.
 
That's something that evolutionists have never been able to answer.

How can monkeys exist today if we evolved from them?

Because we didn't. We share a common ancestor that is extinct today.
 
Because we didn't. We share a common ancestor that is extinct today.

Humans did not evolve from monekys. We are the ancestors of pre-historic humans that lived as long as 2,5 milions years ago.
 
Well why do bacteria still exist if we evolved from them?

Did we?

It just seems kind of farfetched either way. Random mutations among individuals somehow manage to apply themselves across an entire species over several generations.

Maybe if the mutated individuals were the only survivors? I guess?
 
Humans did not evolve from monekys. We are the ancestors of pre-historic humans that lived as long as 2,5 milions years ago.

I'm pointing out that modern monkeys and humans evolved separately from the same common ancestor in Africa millions of years ago. So we're genetically similar but neither evolved from the other.
 
I'm pointing out that modern monkeys and humans evolved separately from the same common ancestor in Africa millions of years ago. So we're genetically similar but neither evolved from the other.

Any evidence or trace of that? Somewhere? And who was that our common ancestor? There are more mammals in the world. Did they evolve from the same ancestor?

Man.... Firaxis needs to dump some new info / teasers on us soon! We are scraping for any little detail!

But they do; they dump us with some dinosaurs' like teasers :D
 
For those who are making fun of Creationism, I do hope the game has actual live Dino DNA in the game.

You know, the stuff, that is considered impossible to have survived 1 million years under ideal conditions, let alone 65 million years. Lol.
 
that's something that evolutionists have never been able to answer.

How can monkeys exist today if we evolved from them?

How can Englishmen exist today if Americans evolved from them?

England does not exist. It is all a lie. All hail Hydra.
 
Ha! Those Fools.

Earth started on 4000BC, Turn one.

Spain appeared as DLC later.

It is known.

Ooh! I didn't think of doing this comparison before: If the time since Civ V was released was stretched out to the time between 2016 AD and 4000 BC, then Spain would have been released at around 3750 BC. :lol:
 
Ooh! I didn't think of doing this comparison before: If the time since Civ V was released was stretched out to the time between 2016 AD and 4000 BC, then Spain would have been released at around 3750 BC. :lol:

:lol: You finally gave me a number I can understand.
 
Maybe it's something you can find on the map that gives a tourism boost? Expeditions in Civ 6?
 
This is a joke right?

As amusing as the salt would be over such a mechanic, I don't envision any major publisher actually daring to do it.

It just seems kind of farfetched either way. Random mutations among individuals somehow manage to apply themselves across an entire species over several generations.

Maybe if the mutated individuals were the only survivors? I guess?

How something "seems" is an extremely poor measure. What matters is evidence.

Mutations are arbitrary, and a lot of them fail/make the reproductive fitness of the mutated organism inferior. Over extremely long periods of time better ones will outcompete inferior ones, but there are tons of noise factors/luck/etc.

There is no rule saying more competitive organisms need be the only survivors.

Where does the evidence point? We can observe mutations directly, both beneficial and not-so-beneficial. That doesn't mean the evolutionary model is necessarily accurate, but it models reality as we can observe it closer than other models so far.

More on topic: In gameplay terms a museum with dinosaurs in it is plausible regardless, because actual museums have such exhibits. The accuracy of the appearance of such creatures is, of course, questionable.
 
Back
Top Bottom