Peacemonger PBEM

Hygro

soundcloud.com/hygro/
Joined
Dec 1, 2002
Messages
26,782
Location
California
Here's the Peacemonger PBEM® game.

After fasting March 5 for world peace, we decided to celebrate our achiements with this game.

Current roster should be (or no particular order):

1)Hygro -Arabia ---djmchygro@aol.com
2)Sultan Bhargash - India
3)CGannon64 -Ottoman Empire ---conorg@nyc.rr.com
4)Toasty -France
5)Sween32 -Celts ---joe@capecod.cc
6)Elden -Rome ---james@cusack.com.au


This game is in 1.14f, even though we all are compatible with 1.21f ;)

Accelerated Production
Small World Size
Standererd Continents/weather patterns, unless otherwise suggested.
Barbarian level: ?
 
I thought toasty was going to play also. He is banned at the moment, but I will pm him about getting his country choice and email address to get it going.

The main questions to settle first-

Can we be as steadfast about playing this one through as we were about the fast?

Will we create special considerations, like the no-war-between-humans clause?

Will we put AI civs in that we can beat up mercilessly like the war hounds we secretly are?
 
So Sween, you ARE playing :)

I was thinking of going mongols as a joke, but if we wage war wit AIs then maybe it wouldn't be so pointless...

I'm often avaliable, especially right now as the fast left my already poor health in a weaker condition, which should get better in a few days.
 
toasty was banned? what happened? :(

i'm all for a no-war-clause.
 
Cool, another one. If you need someone else.... ;)

This is'll fun to to watch. And Sultan, your first PBEM for PTW? Yet you talk of attacking the AI and the thread is Peacemonger. :p

And A B's fan! Going to the game today! (AHL)
 
No I was in the TinyHellions, Two Headed Giants, and Addicted to PBEMs PBEMs but all three fizzled out of lack of participation interest.

About Toasty: he was banned, 7 days. The report on it is on page two of the France and Germany bashing thread in OT. I don't really think it is a fair call. It is often one side of the argument that has to learn to be civil while the other side never gets the lesson.

If we go no war, no AI it will certainly make for interesting strategic choices/changes... and quick turns...
 
So if we are playing a small map, but we already have 6 players, and if we include AIs, then the map needs to be modded or somply larger then small or tiny.

Wildfire, just for your knowledge, this game was spawned out of our celebrating the fact that we all fasted on March 5. Though a spiritual event now, it's sort of become a social event now ;)
 
Toasty says:

Yes, I was going to play .

I will play as France, and can be reached at :I edited this out but have it now:

Tell them I'm against the no-war thing. I'd like to play against a human for once .
 
So toasty is against no war.

And before any more claims go across, I'm grabbing dibs on India!
 
I want war as an option we don't want to take... like, RAZING CITES AND NUKING YEAH BABY!... excuse me, but I what I mean is, we should turn off domination and conquest, but allow war, but frown upon it.

It's kinda hard to explain right but I'll think you understand what I mean.
 
That's a good idea about turning off domination and conquest-- so you can't win from a war but you can wage them...

"As a last resort" as that French ambassador likes to say.
 
I've edited that first post, like a million times.

hmm.. maybe I should be french
 
Toasty already called the French in the post I pasted above.
 
Oh ok
 
Ok, so what about map size and world types and all that stuff? Barbarian levels... you know!
 
small size for quick and constant contact and finishability.

default weather, landmass, etc.

barbarian level, whatever you say.

But I do think we should have the setting at regent level or below, just to eliminate slower tech times.
 
Accelerated production?

With 1.14, how does one set the difficulty to something other than chieftain?
 
Back
Top Bottom