Pentagon 9-11 Video

[GoldEagle]

I know this has already been seen...but where's the plane? Am I the only one who can't find it? All I see is some skinny white thing (for some reason, it looks like a cruise missile to me) that is way too low to be a plane... (watch the first 15 seconds of the video first)

 

[.Shane.]

Oh, god, no, not another one of these!

search is your friend.

 

[GoldEagle]

Oh, god, no, not another one of these!

search is your friend.

I did. All I found was a 5-post thread that said it was going to be released, and that hour-and-a-half video (very good, by the way) that was posted a few days ago.

 

[FriendlyFire]

Pentagon denies or confims it was from them.
A lot of people think is a "photoshoped" video. Which mean certain parts were editied / censored / changed

 

[Xanikk999]

Doesnt matter if the video doesnt show it. I live near the pentagon and i saw the plane with my own eyes. (And so did many other people i know!)

There was no missle. I thought this conspiracy was already debunked?

 

[Chieftess]

I think the 'Pentagon Video' is sort of 'forgotten history'. I remember it being showed early on (back in '01 or '02) when they were showing a clip from the Pentagon Security Camera. I think CNN showed it, and mentioned that you could only see 2 frames.

 

[Turner]

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm

 

[JtheJackal]

I think the 'Pentagon Video' is sort of 'forgotten history'. I remember it being showed early on (back in '01 or '02) when they were showing a clip from the Pentagon Security Camera. I think CNN showed it, and mentioned that you could only see 2 frames.

They recently released the full version. Its not 24 frames per second like regular video so the full plane was never caught on video. You can only see the cockpit of the plane (I think its the pic he pointing at, its really hard to see) and what looks like the tail after the explosion

Edit: looking closer, I don't think thats the frame that has the cockpit of the plane on it.

 

[MjM]

More Conspiracy Theories on this?

 

[PrinceOfLeigh]

More Conspiracy Theories on this?

There shouldn't be, I thought that a new video recently released by the US under some Right to Information Law clearly shows the plane? It was on UK news not long ago but I can't find a link.

Besides I've seen posts from people who saw the bloody plane which is enough for me.

I think this conspiracy should be let lie.

 

[Red Stranger]

All I see is some skinny white thing (for some reason, it looks like a cruise missile to me) that is way too low to be a plane... (watch the first 15 seconds of the video first)

Are you kidding me? That clearly is a plane.

 

[7ronin]

All I see is some skinny white thing (for some reason, it looks like a cruise missile to me) that is way too low to be a plane...

Why do you think it's too low? It's certainly not too low if you're trying to crash into a building. Between the Pentagon and the Potomanc river is nothing but freeway and grass with no tall standing obstructions or buildings in the way. It's a nice wide swath for a gentle glidepath. We also have the eyewitness testimony of hundreds of people who saw the plane crash into the Pentagon.

 

[Yeeek]

Def too small to be a beoing. Of course the quality of the image is so bad you can't tell if it has been 'shoped.

 

[Bugfatty300]

Def too small to be a beoing. Of course the quality of the image is so bad you can't tell if it has been 'shoped.

Precisely Dr. Yeek. That is DEFINETLY too small to be a jet liner. In hindsight of your expert analysis, I must conclude that those hundreds (probably thousands) of eyewitnesses who think they saw a boeing were simply mistaken.

Typical misconception.

Do you know how big the Pentagon is?

 

[Turner]

According to wiki, the height of The Pentagon is 77'3.5", or about 24 meters. The tail height of a Boeing 757 is 44'6", or about 13.5 meters. That is, of course, with the gear up.

Consider also the fact that Flight 11 bounced on the ground before hitting the Pentagon....

 

[Yeeek]

Someone post a picture, i look at it, i don't see a boeing here. The question was do you see a plane? I don't.

Want to go ahead and compare the height of the pentagon and draw plans of a boeing?

Don't need to be emo about it, if you can prove me it is indeed a plane go ahead, thats fine with me. I'm not denying the fact that there was eyewitness that saw a plane. Aren't we discussing the picture itself?

 

[Turner]

Wiki article on Flight 77. Scroll down to the third paragraph entitled 'Crash'. Also look at the link I provided previously at snopes.com.

 

[Bugfatty300]

Someone post a picture, i look at it, i don't see a boeing here. The question was do you see a plane? I don't.

Why didn't you just say that then?

I refering to your comment that the "object" is "definetly" too small to be a boeing. It seems like you didn't factor in how friggen huge the Pentagon is and how puny a boening is when compared to it.

That misconception is the once and only source behind the cruise missile "theory" and sounds like you were falling for it hook line and sinker.

Thankfully, Turner and I came along and educated you

 

[Xenocrates]

There are two theories going round at he present:

There does exist some film evidence that a Boeing hit the pentagon and that the powers that be are keeping it until later to keep the war on terror in people's minds (news management) and to lure some conspiracy theorists into making fools of themselves. By discrediting one theory they know that mud will stick to all. This forum evidences that!

The second theory is that no good footage of the boeing exists, either because the wrong plane or wrong type of plane can be seen or because of some fluke that no camera happened to shoot while the plane was in shot.

I don't know which is true, but either way the case is still not closed.

Can anyone think of another possibility?

 

[Stegyre]

There are two theories going round at he present:

There does exist some film evidence that a Boeing hit the pentagon and that the powers that be are keeping it until later to keep the war on terror in people's minds (news management) and to lure some conspiracy theorists into making fools of themselves. By discrediting one theory they know that mud will stick to all. This forum evidences that!

The second theory is that no good footage of the boeing exists, either because the wrong plane or wrong type of plane can be seen or because of some fluke that no camera happened to shoot while the plane was in shot.

I don't know which is true, but either way the case is still not closed.

Can anyone think of another possibility?

Sure! It's called "the conspiracies are hogwash" theory. It has a lot of support, more support than any competing theory, from what I've been able to see.