Pushing for the Greco-Roman religion

I wish you where right Leftisthominid. However, when I went to Thailand, I learned many so-called 'Buddhists' knew nothing of meditation, and from what I observed they where worshipping Buddha as a god.

Though there are even 'atheistic' Christians and Muslims that I know of. They aren't really athiest per se, they just don't believe in god the same way as religious types do (the ones who believe everything the priest, Bible, Buddha, etc.), or at least the more dogmatic types. 'Religious' and 'spiritual' aren't nesseserily the same thing :D .
 
I thought this discussion is about GR Polytheism? back to the question, i think it has a long name anyway.
 
Traditional Buddhism is agnostic. Insofar as Buddha teaches not to worry about the nature of (the) god(s), because you should get out of the burning building that is this world first. Of course, Buddhism is so wide-spread today precisely because it proved to be extremely adaptive and inclusionist, in large part because it never had a set god or group of gods that were worshipped.

Really, I think Zoroastrianism is a much better pick than...well, Greek myth. Not even the Greeks and Romans took it terribly serious after a certain point. At least Zoroastrianism is still a fairly healthy minor religion today, and was the favored religion of the Persian empires(Achaemenid, Arsacid, and Sassanid), and thus saw much play throughout that region of the world. Furthermore, it was used to justify the reigns of Persian kings, who claimed that their power came from Ahura Mazda and that it was their duty to fight "the Lie"(which, mechanically, meant anyone who had land they fancied). This true evidence of the STATE using religion, whereas the Greeks nor the Romans quite authorized themselves in that manner. It also had a professional priesthood(the Magi) and in this way seems different from the "base", disorganized paganism in Civ4 to a higher degree than Greco-Roman belief.
 
I assume not having a religion can be interpreted as classical paganism. As these early faiths were not as well defined or universal as later organized religions, it's logical (albeit, somewhat of a stretch) to presume they would not have offered the benefits a religion like christianity or hinduism would with the religion civics - so if it's really bothering you, just tell yourself it's already in the game.
 
Traditional Buddhism is agnostic. Insofar as Buddha teaches not to worry about the nature of (the) god(s), because you should get out of the burning building that is this world first. Of course, Buddhism is so wide-spread today precisely because it proved to be extremely adaptive and inclusionist, in large part because it never had a set god or group of gods that were worshipped.

Really, I think Zoroastrianism is a much better pick than...well, Greek myth. Not even the Greeks and Romans took it terribly serious after a certain point. At least Zoroastrianism is still a fairly healthy minor religion today, and was the favored religion of the Persian empires(Achaemenid, Arsacid, and Sassanid), and thus saw much play throughout that region of the world. Furthermore, it was used to justify the reigns of Persian kings, who claimed that their power came from Ahura Mazda and that it was their duty to fight "the Lie"(which, mechanically, meant anyone who had land they fancied). This true evidence of the STATE using religion, whereas the Greeks nor the Romans quite authorized themselves in that manner. It also had a professional priesthood(the Magi) and in this way seems different from the "base", disorganized paganism in Civ4 to a higher degree than Greco-Roman belief.

That took a long time though, and also there are small populations that still believe it in. Google "I Still Worship Zeus". Also, the only reason people stopped believing in the gods was because the gods were banned.

I assume not having a religion can be interpreted as classical paganism. As these early faiths were not as well defined or universal as later organized religions, it's logical (albeit, somewhat of a stretch) to presume they would not have offered the benefits a religion like christianity or hinduism would with the religion civics - so if it's really bothering you, just tell yourself it's already in the game.

The religions of ancient Europe were no less than the current world religions. Hinduism is about as undefined as these religions were
 
Why Greek polytheism is not in game? Because it is no more a widespread religion nowadays.

Yes, I don't have time to read through the entire thread but this sums it up. Anyone who believes in the GR pantheon nowadays is pretty much a pagan (thus we have the paganism civic).
 
Yes, I don't have time to read through the entire thread but this sums it up. Anyone who believes in the GR pantheon nowadays is pretty much a pagan (thus we have the paganism civic).
The pagan civic just instruments a state of having no organization to ones religion.

In civ one could be a Christian and a pagan at the same time. The word pagan is misused in civ. The Roman religion was a costly religion that involved high upkeep and management; the pagan civic required little upkeep
 
Couple Things:
1) Hinduism=Polytheism should be first, since the religion existed prior to 5000 BC, and before Sumer came round
2) This could be followed by Buddhism/Meditation OR another religion like Meso. Polytheism/(insert tech name here)
3) Greco-Roman Religion and Ossirian Pantheism (is that the right term for the Egyptian religion?) could come next, with Polytheism or another tech (Priesthood?)
4) Monotheism/Judaism
5)Theology/Christianity and Divine Right/Islam should come around the same time in terms of tech and era
6)Confucianism and Taoism came around between Egypt and Judah.

Now, paganism is an unelightened term for "non-Judian religions" (I.e, not Islam, Judaism, or Christianity). Thus, the term is kinda (not overly) derogatory, used as an insult. Saying Hinduism or nature-based religions, or Buddhism, Taoism, or Confucianism (all atheistic religions) are "pagan" is strange. All are highly organized, though have no central authority (except for the Dalai Lama of Buddhism). Next, Theocracy is a government led by the religious authority (so should be a Government civic). This is characteristic of the Judian Religions, Hinduism (to an extent), and Egyptian/Greco-Roman polytheism. Pacifism is characteristic of the atheistic religions and Hinduism. Free Religion is fine. Am I missing any? I don't think so.
 
What is this "greco-roman religion"? The Pantheon existed much before the Romans appeared, therefore it is greek. Zeus and the rest of the gang were supposed to live on Mount Olympus. Homer surely wrote about them. Am I missing something here?

By the way, it is estimated that the Pantheon followers in Greece are about 10'000 at present, mainly on the smaller islands.
 
It's known as Greco-Roman since the Romans adopted a lot of their religious customs, gods, and figures from Greek polytheism, and spread it more.
 
It's known as Greco-Roman since the Romans adopted a lot of their religious customs, gods, and figures from Greek polytheism, and spread it more.

OK. This is still a bit shocking to me (I didn't know it was called that), as the romans are also the ones who killed this religion to establish christianity.
 
Sorry,

I haven't read through a lot of this thread, (so I apologize if I repeat points) but I do think that people should recognize that there were a lot of difference in the PRACTICE of Roman and Greek religion. Secondly, religious practices change a lot through toime, and they did in the Roman world.

The most anccient Roman religion was animistic. The first ancient real exclusive Roman religion was in place well before there was Greek influence, and the hall marks of their differnces remain through time. The head of the Roman Religion was the Pontifex Maximus, meaning literally head bridge-builder. The pontifex maximus was the head of the pontiffs, and the most important others were the Flamen, with three major ones and 12 minor ones. The three major ones attended to Jupiter, Quirinus, and Mars. Note that although Jupiter is roughly equivalent to the Greek Zeus, as a sky god leader of the pantheon, Mars is far different from his equivalent Ares and Quirinus just doesn't even really have a Greek equivalent. The 12 minors also worked with gods that didn't have important Greek equivalents.

They used Haruspex for augury, which was always a major form in Roman religion. Inc ontrast, Greek religion tended to use major temples and places (like the Oracle at Delphi, the Great Oracle in the game, or the oracle at Dodona) as sites for augury.

The Romans placed a lot of emphasis on household gods like the Lares, and the Greeks don't have many similarities.

Note that earlier Roman religion was probably more influenced by the Etruscans than the Greeks.

As time passed, Greek elements entered the religion. Where Roman religion was overrun by the Greeks was inthe area of mythology. However, despite what a lot of you seemed to learn or think, MYTHOLOGY IS NOT RELIGION!!! The Romans adapted their stories and mythology and tied it to Greek ones, but the religions were still quite a bit different through time.

The Romans were, by ther nature, inclusive people. They adopted many religions that took form. Mithraism became important in the empire, especially among the military. And, of course, later Christianity took root, but at the time of Constantine, probably about 5% - 10% were Christians. The Romans always had toruble with the Jews because fo the nature of Judaism was hard to 'incorporate' into a general polyhteistic inclusive scheme.

By the time of the empire, the old religion was so complicated that even the Roman ntellectuals complained they didn't understand it.

So, I have to admit, I don't understand what Greco Roman religion is. I understand Greco Roman mythology, and know it quite well, but Greek religion and Roman religion, I think, are probably about as simialr as Judaism and Christianity. There are other parallels. A lot of 'mythology' (Old Testament) of the religions are similar, their views of the prophets, etc. But the practice fo the two religions are very dissimilar. So it was for the Greeks and the Romans.

Best wishes,

Breunor
 
Why Greek polytheism is not in game? Because it is no more a widespread religion nowadays.

Yes this is the best point. Greek polytheism was never a "world religion" in the sense that it spreads beyond its own borders. Plus hardly anyone worship Greek gods nowadays. Notice that all the religions in the game have a large following.

Also there would be too many religions in the game - seven is enough.
 
Well most average people wouldn't know of Hinduism's once large populations outside of South Asia.

A real polytheistic religion is needed in this game. Hinduism is panentheistic.
 
Initially I thought I'd quote someone, but rather than just contribute to the noise level of this thread, here's a few words of choice before I go to bed:

1) Anyone who believes classical religion was akin to "natural religion", i.e some "primitive" polytheism, is dead wrong. Through philosophical speculation there was a considerable shift in Greco Roman religious thought throughout antiquity, where a major trend towards "monotheism" - as in one supreme underlying principle operating beyond several minor manifestations (individual gods) - is one of the most discernible and principal developments. That the religion of Homer was not identical to the religion of Emperor Julian or Diocletian is fairly well known, but more importantly, it wasn't even the same as the one embraced by Xenophanes or Plato.
This means that GR was at least as "organized" as some other religions of the game.

2) If Greco Roman religion is supposed to be covered by polytheism/paganism, then why is Hinduism in the game? And if so why isn't polytheism/paganism able to build its own temples and reap the same rewards as Hinduism or other religions? (Hinduism is merely a collective tag for a bundle of pagan beliefs and practices local to the Indian subcontinent.)

3) There are four eastern religions in the game (Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism) and only three for the rest of the world (Christianity, Judaism and Islam). Does anyone seriously think this makes sense? It's almost impossible to avoid having your knights ride around chanting "Ohmm!" all the time.

4) The notion that only proselyting religions should be considered and therefore GR is out, is absurd on at least two accounts. One: several of the "religions" included in the game are in fact NOT missionary faiths (for example, Hinduism and Judaism) and some aren't even religions at all, but rather philosophical traditions (for example, Confucianism). Two: Greco Roman religion did spread. It spread to everywhere that Greeks and Romans went, that is, by cultural influence.
Clearly, the game's objective is to portray religions with a major cultural impact, that is, constituting dominating spritual factors when encountering alternative traditions. For this, GR and Zoroastrianism definitely qualifies, actually rather more so than some others.

5) Yes, Civilization attempts in some ways to be "historically" themed, but really, it is fundamentally a kind of what-if historical orientation at that. And in terms of what-if scenarios, there is simply no reason other than historical coincidence (Emperor Constantine) that we are christians today rather than followers of say, the Mother Isis. In no way was Christianity more "advanced" than its competitors, in fact there is a lot which could be stated to the contrary.
Another way to put the same thing: If religions were to be geared towards what someone considers major religions today, why on earth are Romans or Incas in the game when it comes to peoples?


To cut the above short, I frankly see no reason why GR and Zoroastrianism were left out of the game, other than possibly design team ignorance. Those two should definitely have been in (and perhaps also some indigenous American religion).


In consequence, this is what I suggest:

1) GR could be included under the name of "Hellenism". That way it covers not only Greek and Roman origins, but includes everything that characterized classical civilization when it comes to sprituality (for example Egyptian or other "oriental" cults).

2) Zoroastrianism should be in, no question about it. Its cultural influence was immense and it's only a minority religion today becuase it was crushed under the dogmatist military machine of Islam.

3) Some "American" religion should be in to give the right flavour to indigenous western hemisphere peoples.

To account for these additions, Confucianism, Taoism and Judaism could be scrapped (in that order). To cover eastern religious forms in general, Buddhism is quite enough since it is ubiquitious, and Hinduism can come along for the ride in order to offer some variety. Judaism might have tremendous covert power in the world today, but it is after all not so much a religion as a definition of an ethnic group, and as far as its religious dimension is concerned, it is of course not only non-missionary, but even actively exclusivist most of the time.


That's all. Thanks.
 
I would love to see different religions do different things, I know I am a new comer to CivIV however religions seems trivial to me, they all provide the same thing. If they had +'s and -'s like the civics (like high upkeep but they provide an additional happiness, or your units get twice the experience but you can only have so many of them.) then it would have been better off, or at the least different religions had different buildings that improved something else. Like a Christian temple gives off extra commerce and Judaism buildings increase research. Or the most recent thing that came to my mind is to have civs not able to have a peaceful trade relationship with civs with the other religion, then you have incentives to convert or not depending on the pluses and minuses........just my opinion by the way.....I still have a long way to go.

Civ 4 is greatly improved compared to Civ3 and I still have a lot to learn.
 
Yes this is the best point. Greek polytheism was never a "world religion" in the sense that it spreads beyond its own borders. Plus hardly anyone worship Greek gods nowadays.

Actually, it is a lousy point. Hellenism spread to everywhere Greek and Roman armies marched, from the Indus Valley to Britain. There was an Iseum even as far away as York.


Plus hardly anyone worship Greek gods nowadays. Notice that all the religions in the game have a large following.

Is there a Roman, Greek, Persian or Inca civilization nowadays?
 
Initially I thought I'd quote someone, but rather than just contribute to the noise level of this thread, here's a few words of choice before I go to bed:

1) Anyone who believes classical religion was akin to "natural religion", i.e some "primitive" polytheism, is dead wrong. Through philosophical speculation there was a considerable shift in Greco Roman religious thought throughout antiquity, where a major trend towards "monotheism" - as in one supreme underlying principle operating beyond several minor manifestations (individual gods) - is one of the most discernible and principal developments. That the religion of Homer was not identical to the religion of Emperor Julian or Diocletian is fairly well known, but more importantly, it wasn't even the same as the one embraced by Xenophanes or Plato.
This means that GR was at least as "organized" as some other religions of the game.

2) If Greco Roman religion is supposed to be covered by polytheism/paganism, then why is Hinduism in the game? And if so why isn't polytheism/paganism able to build its own temples and reap the same rewards as Hinduism or other religions? (Hinduism is merely a collective tag for a bundle of pagan beliefs and practices local to the Indian subcontinent.)

3) There are four eastern religions in the game (Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism) and only three for the rest of the world (Christianity, Judaism and Islam). Does anyone seriously think this makes sense? It's almost impossible to avoid having your knights ride around chanting "Ohmm!" all the time.

4) The notion that only proselyting religions should be considered and therefore GR is out, is absurd on at least two accounts. One: several of the "religions" included in the game are in fact NOT missionary faiths (for example, Hinduism and Judaism) and some aren't even religions at all, but rather philosophical traditions (for example, Confucianism). Two: Greco Roman religion did spread. It spread to everywhere that Greeks and Romans went, that is, by cultural influence.
Clearly, the game's objective is to portray religions with a major cultural impact, that is, constituting dominating spritual factors when encountering alternative traditions. For this, GR and Zoroastrianism definitely qualifies, actually rather more so than some others.

5) Yes, Civilization attempts in some ways to be "historically" themed, but really, it is fundamentally a kind of what-if historical orientation at that. And in terms of what-if scenarios, there is simply no reason other than historical coincidence (Emperor Constantine) that we are christians today rather than followers of say, the Mother Isis. In no way was Christianity more "advanced" than its competitors, in fact there is a lot which could be stated to the contrary.
Another way to put the same thing: If religions were to be geared towards what someone considers major religions today, why on earth are Romans or Incas in the game when it comes to peoples?


To cut the above short, I frankly see no reason why GR and Zoroastrianism were left out of the game, other than possibly design team ignorance. Those two should definitely have been in (and perhaps also some indigenous American religion).


In consequence, this is what I suggest:

1) GR could be included under the name of "Hellenism". That way it covers not only Greek and Roman origins, but includes everything that characterized classical civilization when it comes to sprituality (for example Egyptian or other "oriental" cults).

2) Zoroastrianism should be in, no question about it. Its cultural influence was immense and it's only a minority religion today becuase it was crushed under the dogmatist military machine of Islam.

3) Some "American" religion should be in to give the right flavour to indigenous western hemisphere peoples.

To account for these additions, Confucianism, Taoism and Judaism could be scrapped (in that order). To cover eastern religious forms in general, Buddhism is quite enough since it is ubiquitious, and Hinduism can come along for the ride in order to offer some variety. Judaism might have tremendous covert power in the world today, but it is after all not so much a religion as a definition of an ethnic group, and as far as its religious dimension is concerned, it is of course not only non-missionary, but even actively exclusivist most of the time.


That's all. Thanks.

I love it. You complain that religions have an eastern bias, and then create a western bias:rolleyes: That is no better, especially since you are completely failing to represent a pair of belief systems that had at least as much influence on Chinese and Korean thought(and, to a lesser extent, Japanese) than any other religion in the world, neither of which has anything remotely similar in the game. IMO, this game could support additional religions, but the key thing is that religions are imbalanced, in that the early ones are almost always dominant. There is no mechanism to give Christianity and especially Islam a chance to become more than some podunk sect with a thousand adherents unless all the stars align perfectly...
 
I love it. You complain that religions have an eastern bias, and then create a western bias:rolleyes: That is no better...

Look at my suggestions again. Break it down you'll find the following:

1 Native American religion
2 European religions (Hellenism, Christianity)
2 Mideastern religions (Zoroastrianism, Islam)
2 Eastern religions (Hinduism, Buddhism)

Where's the western bias, dude?

...especially since you are completely failing to represent a pair of belief systems that had at least as much influence on Chinese and Korean thought(and, to a lesser extent, Japanese) than any other religion in the world, neither of which has anything remotely similar in the game.

I'd love to have it all, but I'm limited to what can be done with 7 slots, i.e partly from a modding perspective.

IMO, this game could support additional religions, but the key thing is that religions are imbalanced, in that the early ones are almost always dominant. There is no mechanism to give Christianity and especially Islam a chance to become more than some podunk sect with a thousand adherents unless all the stars align perfectly...

I absolutely agree. One could call it a design flaw. Strange thing, these early religions just happen to be all eastern in game. :crazyeye:
 
Back
Top Bottom