TopGun69 said:
Just a thought... why not give Australia an Aboriginal Leader, instead of (yet another) white leaderhead? If Australia was represented by the Aboriginals, I would endorse it into Civ...
I've passionately discussed this elsewhere before... and don't really want to spam up this thread, but a couple of reasons.
1) Aboriginal Australia's population has remained diverse throughout history. Hundreds of languages, no cohesive government, different art forms etc, mean that there is no aboriginal civ as such. A cohesive identity was only imposed by white settlement.
2) The lack of cohesive identity means lack of national leader. There have been significant and celebrated aboriginal leaders, certainly, but none which qualify in the 'Civ' sense.
3) Australia only became a nation with common identity under white settlement, and only at the beginning of the 1900s. At this point, Australia became one of the geographically largest countries in the world, and one of its most democratic.
4) Menzies, as the longest serving PM in Australian history, is certainly well qualified for the honour of being Australia's Civ head.
5) While there are aboriginal place names, there were no aboriginal 'cities' as such - just broad areas of settlement.
I understand why people would want an Aboriginal leaderhead, but historically and culturally it makes no sense.